Latest
Red wealth, dark money: How an American tycoon deploys Mao’s playbook against the West
Part 2 of a five-part Fox News Digital series investigating the House of Singham examines the “United Front,” a key element of Chinese communist leader Mao Zedong’s “People’s War” strategy.
As CodePink co-founders Jodie Evans and Medea Benjamin ended their activist group’s pilgrimage to communist Cuba yesterday, their sojourn reflected a strategy years in the making: a “united front” aligning far-left, socialist and communist revolutionaries across borders.
In late October 1944, Chinese Communist Party leader Mao Zedong delivered a speech, outlining a strategy to unite disparate groups under a shared ideological framework, telling followers: “For this struggle a broad united front is indispensable.”
More than two decades later, in 1966, Cuban leader Fidel Castro convened revolutionaries in Havana for the Tricontinental Conference, where he pledged “support to any revolutionary movement in any corner of the earth,”
And more recently, an American-born Marxist businessman named Neville Roy Singham sold his technology company, Thoughtworks, for an estimated $785 million in 2017, and a Fox News Digital investigation reveals that he set about building his own version of Mao’s united front.
The investigation, using large language models to analyze hundreds of pages of tax records, organizational messaging, online content and historical records, found Singham pumped at least $278 million into a layered network of 2,000 nonprofits, think tanks, activist groups and media organizations with shared messaging and ideology matching the communist ideals of Mao and Castro, operating across borders while appearing independent. What emerges isn’t a loose coalition but a tightly knit system.
At the time of the sale, Thoughtwork’s chief scientist, Martin Fowler, acknowledged the proceeds would fund Singham’s “activist work.” The sale created a war chest that would flow into the constellation of nonprofits that now comprise the “House of Singham.”
Policymakers and law enforcement officials have gotten a glimpse into pieces of Singham’s influence, from anti-Israel protests in the U.S. to a propaganda machine in India and the hijacking of a labor union in South Africa. But the broader picture is more expansive: a transnational network buried in layer upon layer of companies entangled with shared leaders, shared addresses and a shared mission to spread Marxism and promote China as a global counterweight to the U.S. in a new Cold War.
IRS records show that three entities transferred $278 million from 2017 through 2023 into six core U.S. nonprofits in Singham’s network, but those six nonprofits haven’t operated in isolation. They have functioned as hubs in a broader system, receiving and redistributing funding, and coordinating activity across a widening network of affiliated groups.
In 2017, when Singham married Evans, he relied on many of their wedding guests as lieutenants, consiglieres, strategists, propagandists and field marshals to mobilize thousands of foot soldiers to promote China’s interests. One recurring theme is promotion of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, a global infrastructure and trade effort designed to expand China’s economic and geopolitical influence.
Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Washington, D.C., told Fox News Digital, he wasn’t familiar with “the specifics of this particular case.”
Pengyu added that China “welcomes and hopes that more people in the United States will view China in an objective and fair light, and lend their voices to the sound and stable development of China–U.S. relations.”
Rep. Jason Smith, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, has described Singham as “an individual who lives in Shanghai, maintains business ties with companies and individuals linked to the CCP, works with and physically alongside a foreign propaganda company, and attends CCP forums on how to promote the party abroad.”
According to people familiar with the transactions, Singham used GS Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund For Wealth Management Inc., affiliated with Goldman Sachs Group Inc., to anonymously direct tax-deductible donations to a new tranche of nonprofits established after his marriage to Evans. Goldman Sachs spokesman Tony Fratto said that the company’s philanthropy arm “terminated” Singham’s donor-advised fund in February 2024.
FAR-LEFT ACTIVIST GROUP FACES BACKLASH OVER ‘TONE-DEAF’ PROTESTS AT CUBA LUXURY HOTEL
Fox News Digital also identified two fly-by-night companies – Likewise Conceptions LLC and Mutod LLC – that appear in the network’s financial architecture.
Likewise Conceptions listed an address outside Chicago, while Mutod used the address of a hotel in downtown Chicago. Two other organizations linked to Singham used a hotel and a cocktail lounge as addresses. Fox News Digital reviewed incorporation papers, state registrations, property records and other open-source materials but couldn’t identify meaningful public footprints for either entity. Singham and Evans didn’t respond to requests for comment.
Those entities functioned as conduits, moving large sums into nonprofits that would then redistribute funds across additional layers of the network.
Over months of reporting, Fox News Digital built organizational charts tracing the network’s structure. At least 18 guests from the “Jodie and Roy” wedding of “One Love” in Jamaica appear within a wider network of about 80 people serving in core leadership across about 15 central organizations.
The network contains members of Singham’s family, including his son Nathan Singham, his niece Alicia Singham Goodwin and his sister, Shanti Singham, who has academic ties to East China Normal University in Shanghai. The university, which is administered by the Chinese Community Party (CCP), co-sponsored the Global South Academic Conference where Singham appeared last fall, lambasting the U.S. as a “fascist” nation. East China Normal University didn’t respond to a request for comment.
The wider circle of wedding guests included actor Danny Glover, playwright Eve Ensler, now known as V, and “Democracy Now” TV host Amy Goodman.
Another guest, Ben Cohen, the co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, has more recently appeared, getting arrested with CodePink activists as he interrupted Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. during a Congressional hearing over Gaza and then called for the defunding of ICE earlier this year.
FBI agents arrested another wedding guest, Ibrahim AlHusseni, last year for alleged securities fraud and he later entered a guilty plea. Late last year, Evans allegedly helped pay his $3 million bail, according to court-related reporting. He is scheduled to be sentenced in July.
Within this period, the People’s Forum’s organizing work and BreakThrough News coverage became central to nationwide demonstrations, coordinated through the Party for Socialism and Liberation and the ANSWER Coalition.
FOX NEWS DIGITAL ANALYSIS: HOW MINNEAPOLIS AGITATOR NETWORKS USE INSURGENCY TACTICS TO HINDER ICE
One of the nonprofits Singham funded immediately in 2017 with his newfound wealth was Tricontinental Ltd., based in Massachusetts, led by his friend and wedding guest, Vijay Prashad. It was named for the 1966 Tricontinental Conference.
In a letter to one of the Singham organizations, Tricontinental, Smith warned that “interlocking ownership and management roles” across the entities suggest a strategy to embed CCP propaganda “under the guise of independent scholarship and commerce.” Tricontinental hasn’t made any public responses to the letter, but it posted a video from Brazil last month on Instagram, inviting followers to read the “Communist Manifesto” for “Red Book Day.”
Fox News Digital found that one nonprofit that Singham funded, the People’s Support Foundation, reported investments for years in the China-U.S. Industrial Cooperation Partnership Parallel LP, an investment vehicle tied to a partnership between Goldman Sachs and the China Investment Corporation, the state-sanctioned investment arm of the Chinese Communist Party.
In its 2019 tax filing, the People’s Support Foundation disclosed a $75,165 holding. By 2024, the holding had grown to $410,484, according to tax records.
The amounts were modest. But they placed a Singham-linked nonprofit inside a financial structure designed to blend U.S. private-equity management with Chinese state capital during a time of heightened national security scrutiny. While the records do not prove coordination or intent, they reveal overlapping interests at a sensitive geopolitical intersection.
In 2019, that partnership purchased Boyd Corporation, a California-based manufacturer.
Fratto said those investments were legal and “intended to increase foreign direct investment in the United States.” He added the investments “don’t confer any control over the companies by an individual investor.”
Less than three weeks after the Singham-Evans wedding, on Feb. 27, 2017, the People’s Forum was registered in New York state, according to state records.
Singham initially funneled $2.5 million into the People’s Forum. It had some familiar names on the board: Evans and Claudia De la Cruz, a wedding guest and a leader in two organizations that would become critical in sowing mayhem on the streets of the U.S., the People’s Forum and the Party for Socialism and Liberation.
Another key board member was Manolo De Los Santos, a self-avowed Marxist born in the Dominican Republic. Outside the People’s Forum headquarters in New York City recently, he refused to answer questions from a Fox News Digital investigative team.
De Los Santos has publicly posted photos of himself with Venezuelan leader Nicholas Maduro, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel and Fernando Gonzalez, one of the “Cuban 5,” Cuban intelligence officers arrested in 1998 in the U.S. for spying and later convicted.
Brian Becker, a longtime Marxist organizer, also became a key figure around the People’s Forum, turning it into a base for expanding protest infrastructure he’d already cultivated with the ANSWER Coalition and Party for Socialism and Liberation, organizing anti-American demonstrations as the son of an American Marxist leader from the 1960s. He also refused to answer questions from Fox News Digital, calling a journalist a “terrorist.”
Ismail Royer, a former extremist imprisoned for supporting the Lashkar-e-Taiba militant group in Pakistan, remembers Becker and his socialist crew taking over protests and telling Muslim groups to step aside.
“They told us, ‘Just show up. We’ll take care of everything,” Royer told Fox News Digital.
Over the following years, Singham doled out a total of $22.4 million to the People’s Forum, according to Fox News Digital’s analysis.
The organization operated not just as a physical space, but as a coordination hub in the emerging Mao-style united front, linking funding, messaging and protest activity. It was also moving money into protest infrastructure, including funding tied to large demonstrations.
In its first year, the People’s Forum said it spent $428,470 developing a space to “foster collaboration and exchange between diverse social movements,” to “build unity across historic lines of division at home and abroad” and “nurture the next generation of visionaries and organizers who believe that through collective action, a new world is possible.
In late 2021, the People’s Forum hosted a day-long conference on “China and the Left,” featuring Singham’s friend, Prashad, the Qiao Collective and Tings Chak, Prashad’s colleague at Tricontinental with close ties to academic institutions in China.
Sessions included “Poverty Alleviation in China,” China “as a Model for Third World Development” and “China as a Challenge to Capitalism.”
The day’s speakers blasted “The U.S. Hybrid War on China,” “Anti-Asian Violence” in the U.S. and an American bias they dubbed “yellow peril.”
In 2023, the People’s Forum gave the ANSWER Coalition’s fiscal sponsor, Progress Unity Fund, $26,400 it raised at the anti-Israel “National March on Washington” on Nov. 4, 2023, less than a month after the Oct. 7 attack. It wasn’t a lot of money, but the payment reveals the way these organizations work in lock-step with each other.
The next year, Progress Unity Fund reported a $267,756 payment to the ANSWER Coalition for “mobilizing hundreds of thousands of people in a [sic] mass actions in Washington, D.C. and around the country,” according to its tax filing.
It gave $35,000 to BreakThrough BT Media Inc., which broadcast the anti-U.S. protests to the world.
Not long ago, according to property records, the People’s Forum purchased a multi-million dollar building on 14th Street on Manhattan’s Lower East Side.
Fox News Digital found that Singham allegedly used two mystery companies to pour money into another new nonprofit, the People’s Support Foundation Ltd., again with Evans on the board, along with former Thoughtworks executives.
IRS filings show that in 2017, Mutod LLC, just established on Sept. 11, 2017, in Delaware, transferred $160.2 million into the People’s Support Foundation. In IRS filings, Mutod used the address of a hotel on E. Wacker Drive, suite no. 256.
Meanwhile, Likewise Conceptions LLC, which shared an address with a FedEx store on Liberty Road in Crystal Lake, Il., north of Chicago, poured $3.5 million into the People’s Support Foundation. And Mutod LLC put another $3.8 million into the organization in 2018.
The People’s Support Foundation then became a funding source for another tier of entities with generic names, including the People’s Welfare Association and the United Community Fund.
Both were registered as 501(c)(4) political nonprofits. Both used UPS Stores as mailing addresses. Both included familiar names from the House of Singham on their boards.
They repeated a recurring pattern in the network: new nonprofit layers appear with generic names, limited public footprints and overlapping leadership, as money continues to move outward.
The United Community Fund listed its tax code as “Q01: International, Foreign Affairs, and National Security Alliances and Advocacy.”
The United Community Fund had some strong anti-American voices on its board: Layan Fuleihan, a fiery Palestinian American leader at the People’s Forum who has led virulent anti-Israel protests; and Chak, a trusted figure in the Singham inner circle and Tricontinental official with ties to Chinese universities.
The money flowing from the People’s Support Foundation into the United Community Fund followed a familiar pattern: one layer funding another, with overlapping personnel and funding.
A question hangs over the structure Fox News Digital traced: why does the House of Singham rely on multiple nonprofit layers, recurring addresses and recycled leadership to move money and organize activity?
As the network expanded across nonprofits, media platforms and activist groups, it promoted the old ideas of Mao and the “United Front.” In February, at the launch of a new book, “Tricontinental, Havana 1966,” filled with speeches and documents from the conference, Prashad and De Los Santos regaled an audience at the People’s Forum with stories of the global communist “revolutionaries” at the conference led by “our commander Fidel,” as Prashad described Castro. De Los Santos noted the participants “weren’t armchair leftists,” who were “shifting from one hotel to the other doing international left tourism.”
“We believe strongly that communism is the actual movement of history,” Prashad said.
Earlier this month, the State Department identified the People’s Forum and CodePink as vectors of threat because of their alignment with the People’s Republic of China. The State Department said the groups “denigrate the United States, whitewash the violence of Marxist regimes, and run cover for narco-terrorists like {former Venezuelan dictator Nicolas] Maduro while enjoying an influx of cash from a donor network with connections to the Chinese Communist Party.”
Meanwhile, the House Ways and Means Committee and House Oversight Committee are investigating the Singham network for potential violations of nonprofit law. Justice, State and Treasury Department officials are also investigating Singham and the organizations he has funded, according to people familiar with the investigations.
Last September, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer, R-Ky.), and the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets Chairwoman Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., asked Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to conduct a “comprehensive evaluation to determine whether federal sanctions, civil remedies or criminal penalties—including asset freezes or seizures—should be applied to far-left entities organized and funded by Mr. Singham.”
The Trump administration has precedent to act. The Justice Department prosecuted a nonprofit in USA v. Babakov, ECF for serving “as a front for a global foreign influence campaign to advance Russia’s foreign policy objectives.” That case didn’t have any connection to Singham or his network.
Smith said at a recent hearing, “This is something every American should care about.” The investigations are ongoing, and no one in the Singham network has been charged with any crimes nor has any action been taken against any organizations or individuals in the Singham network. No one from the Singham network has been found liable for any legal violations.
The White House recently created a new National Security Council position, called the “Director of Cognitive Advantage,” held by Shawn Chenoweth, to address what officials describe as information warfare, a critical element of a nation’s “soft power.”
In public remarks, Chenoweth has described the job as putting the “I,” for “information,” back into a national power framework known as DIME: diplomatic, information, military and economic power.
The Singham network sits at that intersection, and as Evans’ and Benjamin’s CodePink delegation departed Cuba, the convoy reflected the outward expression of a structure built over years, following Mao’s strategy of connecting international travel, coordinated messaging and on-the-ground activism in a “United Front.”
“Viva Cuba!” Benjamin shouted from the airport, as her fellow radicals flashed “V” for victory signs.
Nikolas Lanam, Brooke Curto and Kyle Schmidbauer contributed to this report.
Up next in Part 3: How the House of Singham funds and distributes pro-China, anti-America “Propaganda Work” through media ventures, content networks and transnational messaging platforms.
Latest
SCOTUS Issues Unanimous Ruling In Controversial Case
The Supreme Court of the United States has issued a major unanimous ruling that could significantly reshape the trucking, freight, and logistics industries nationwide, holding that freight brokers can be sued under state negligence laws for hiring unsafe trucking companies.
The 9-0 decision in *Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC* is being viewed as one of the most consequential transportation rulings in years and is expected to have far-reaching effects on freight operations, insurance costs, litigation exposure, and safety oversight across the trucking industry.
The case stemmed from a devastating 2017 crash on Interstate 70 in Illinois involving a semi-truck arranged by C.H. Robinson, one of the largest freight brokers in the country.
Plaintiff Shawn Montgomery suffered catastrophic injuries, including the loss of part of his leg, after a truck driver crashed into his parked tractor-trailer. Montgomery argued that C.H. Robinson should bear responsibility because the broker allegedly hired a carrier with a known history of safety issues and failed to properly vet the company before putting the truck on the road.
At the center of the legal battle was the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, commonly referred to as the FAAAA. Freight brokers argued the law broadly preempts state-level lawsuits involving broker “prices, routes, or services,” effectively shielding brokers from negligence claims tied to trucking accidents.
Lower courts in the Seventh Circuit agreed with C.H. Robinson and ruled that Montgomery’s claims were barred under federal law.
But the Supreme Court unanimously reversed that decision in an opinion authored by Amy Coney Barrett.
The Court concluded that the FAAAA contains what is known as a “safety exception,” allowing states to continue enforcing laws connected to motor vehicle safety. Barrett wrote that negligent hiring claims against freight brokers directly “concern” motor vehicles because brokers play a critical role in choosing the trucking companies operating on public roads.
In practical terms, the decision means freight brokers can no longer automatically invoke federal preemption to avoid lawsuits involving crashes caused by carriers they selected. Plaintiffs may now pursue claims arguing brokers negligently hired trucking companies with unsafe drivers, poor inspection histories, or repeated safety violations.
The trucking and logistics industries are already warning that the ruling could dramatically increase legal exposure and operational costs. Industry groups argued during the case that opening brokers to negligence lawsuits could trigger a surge in litigation, raise insurance premiums, and force brokers to spend far more time and resources investigating carriers before assigning loads.
Some industry leaders fear the ruling could ultimately slow freight movement nationwide and increase shipping costs that may eventually be passed along to consumers through higher prices on goods and services.
Brett Kavanaugh acknowledged those concerns in a concurring opinion, describing the case as “close” and recognizing that the ruling could create substantial economic ripple effects throughout the freight sector. Nevertheless, Kavanaugh agreed that public safety considerations outweighed the transportation industry’s arguments for broad immunity.
The ruling is expected to force many freight brokers to overhaul their internal vetting and compliance systems. Transportation attorneys say brokers will likely begin conducting more aggressive background reviews on carriers, closely monitoring Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration safety scores, and keeping extensive documentation explaining why certain carriers were selected for shipments.
The Supreme Court’s decision also resolves a longstanding split among federal appeals courts. Prior to the ruling, the Ninth and Sixth Circuits allowed these negligence claims to proceed, while the Seventh Circuit blocked them under federal preemption rules. The Court’s unanimous ruling now creates a nationwide legal standard.
Legal analysts say the decision could trigger a major increase in lawsuits following catastrophic trucking accidents. Instead of targeting only truck drivers and trucking companies, plaintiffs’ attorneys are now expected to aggressively pursue freight brokers as additional defendants, particularly when accidents involve carriers with troubling safety records or repeated regulatory violations.
For the freight industry, the ruling marks a major shift in legal liability — one that could permanently alter how brokers select carriers, manage risk, and conduct business moving forward.
Latest
Feds Swarm Red State After Alarming Underwater Bomb Found
An alarming discovery at a major Alabama water source triggered a massive law enforcement and homeland security response this week after divers uncovered what officials described as a grenade-type improvised explosive device at the base of a dam supplying drinking water to thousands of residents.
The device was discovered Wednesday during routine maintenance work at the Converse Reservoir in Alabama, according to local authorities. Divers working near the dam reportedly spotted the suspicious object underwater and immediately alerted officials, setting off a rapid emergency response involving local law enforcement, bomb technicians, and federal authorities.
Officials said the object was identified as a “grenade-type IED [improvised explosive device],” raising immediate concerns because the reservoir and surrounding infrastructure play a critical role in supplying drinking water to communities in the area.
Authorities quickly secured the scene as bomb experts carefully retrieved the device from the water. The explosive was later transported away from the dam and safely detonated in a controlled operation near Mobile. No injuries were reported.
Investigators have not yet determined how the device ended up submerged at the base of the dam, but bomb technicians told 1819 News that the explosive appeared to have been intentionally constructed and deliberately placed. That possibility has raised serious questions about whether the dam and reservoir may have been specifically targeted.
“Our top priority is keeping your drinking water safe,” said Bud McCrory, whose agency oversees the reservoir.
“This is an unprecedented threat, and we are fortunate that this device was discovered before it could cause serious damage to our water supply or harm to individuals,” McCrory continued.
The Mobile Area Water and Sewer System, commonly known as MAWSS, had hired the divers performing maintenance work at the dam when the device was found. Officials emphasized that the discovery may have prevented a potentially catastrophic situation involving both public safety and critical infrastructure.
The Converse Reservoir dam and nearby Big Creek Lake are federally classified as critical infrastructure sites due to their importance to the region’s water system. Because of that designation, the case has now been referred to the Department of Homeland Security for further investigation alongside local and state authorities.
“We are grateful for the professionalism and competency of our law enforcement partners – as well as the quick thinking of our contractors and divers – in identifying this device and safely destroying it,” McCrory said.
Officials say security around the reservoir and dam will now be reviewed and strengthened in cooperation with law enforcement agencies. Surveillance systems are already in place at the site, but the discovery has intensified concerns about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure facilities across the country.
Monica Allen said the incident struck a personal nerve for many workers because employees are frequently present at the dam.
“Our staff is on that dam, if not daily, every other day,” Allen said.
She also pointed out that residential homes are located near the area, adding another layer of concern about what could have happened had the explosive detonated unexpectedly.
“And there are homes in that area, so you just don’t know. We live in a different kind of world now,” Allen added.
At this point, authorities have not identified any suspects or publicly discussed possible motives. Investigators are expected to review surveillance footage, maintenance records, and access points surrounding the reservoir as they work to determine who may have placed the device and why.
The shocking discovery comes amid growing national concerns about threats to critical infrastructure, including water systems, power grids, transportation hubs, and communication networks. Federal officials have repeatedly warned in recent years that both domestic and foreign actors could seek to target vulnerable infrastructure sites in ways capable of disrupting essential public services.
For now, officials stress that the water supply remains safe and operational, but the discovery of an explosive device at the bottom of a major drinking water reservoir has left many residents deeply unsettled.
Latest
Obama Just Did The Unthinkable — Leaves Americans Speechless
President Donald Trump and former President Barack Obama are once again clashing publicly, this time over the outcome of a major election in Hungary that saw longtime conservative Prime Minister Viktor Orbán defeated by left-wing challenger Péter Magyar.
The race drew international attention because Orbán has long been viewed as one of Trump’s closest ideological allies in Europe. Trump and many conservatives have praised Orbán for his hardline stances on immigration, national sovereignty, border enforcement, traditional values, and opposition to globalist institutions.
In a last-minute effort to help boost support for Orbán ahead of the election, Trump dispatched Vice President JD Vance to Hungary to publicly back the conservative government. Despite the high-profile support, Magyar ultimately secured a decisive victory.
Obama quickly celebrated the outcome online, framing the election as a broader rejection of populist conservative movements.
“The victory of the opposition in Hungary yesterday, like the Polish election in 2023, is a victory for democracy, not just in Europe but around the world. Most of all, it’s a testament to the resilience and determination of the Hungarian people – and a reminder to all of us to keep striving for fairness, equality and the rule of law,” Obama wrote on X.
The comments immediately reignited tensions between Obama-world and the MAGA movement, with many conservatives pointing out that Orbán himself had won repeated democratic elections during his 16 years leading Hungary. Trump allies argued that labeling the defeat of a democratically elected conservative government as a “victory for democracy” exposed what they see as a double standard from global elites and establishment political figures.
The latest dispute adds to a growing public feud between Trump and Obama as Trump’s second administration moves aggressively to reverse many Obama-era policies both domestically and internationally. Obama has become increasingly vocal in opposing Trump and conservative policies, abandoning the traditional practice of former presidents largely avoiding direct political combat with successors.
In recent months, Obama has openly supported Democratic redistricting efforts in states like Virginia and California, even after criticizing similar efforts by Republicans in states such as Texas and Missouri. Critics accused Obama of hypocrisy and selectively supporting election changes only when they benefit Democrats.
Obama also recently drew criticism after using remarks tied to the death of civil rights activist Jesse Jackson to attack Trump and Republicans more broadly. The speech reportedly drew pushback even from Jesse Jackson Jr., the late activist’s son.
At the same time, Trump has repeatedly intensified his attacks on Obama over foreign policy, especially regarding Iran. Earlier this month, Trump and Pete Hegseth criticized Obama’s Iran nuclear deal and accused the former administration of empowering Tehran financially and militarily.
The criticism comes as the United States and Israel continue Operation Epic Fury, a military effort targeting Iran’s military infrastructure after Trump claimed the Iranian regime resumed covert nuclear weapons development.
Speaking Friday during the FII PRIORITY Summit, Trump blasted Obama over the controversial $1.7 billion payment made to Iran during implementation of the nuclear deal.
“That Barack Hussein Obama, did you ever hear of him? Barack Hussein Obama, he had the Iran nuclear deal. He went to Iran, he paid them,” Trump said. “Remember, he sent two Boeing 757 jetliners. They took the seats out and they piled it with cash, like 1.7 billion of cash.”
“That’s when I realized the president is very powerful. The presidency is a very powerful thing when you can do that. I haven’t done that yet. I haven’t found a reason to do that yet, but that’s big,” Trump added.
Obama officials at the time defended the payment, arguing it settled a decades-old legal dispute tied to a failed arms agreement dating back to the 1979 Iranian Revolution, when the Shah was overthrown and American hostages were held for more than 440 days.
Trump, however, has consistently argued the deal emboldened the Iranian regime and funded hostile activity across the Middle East.
“You know, there wasn’t a bank in DC, Virginia, or Maryland that had any money after that disaster,” Trump said.
“But they sent the cash to Iran, but more importantly, they signed an agreement, the Iran nuclear deal, which, if I didn’t terminate it in my first term, I terminated it almost immediately. If I didn’t terminate it, they would have had a nuclear weapon long ago, and they would have used it on the Middle East, Israel,” the president stated.
The renewed clashes between Trump and Obama underscore the widening ideological divide not only in American politics but increasingly across the global stage, where battles over nationalism, sovereignty, immigration, and foreign policy continue reshaping alliances and political movements worldwide.
-
Latest1 month agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News4 weeks agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Latest1 month agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News1 month agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News1 month agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
News1 month agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Latest1 month agoTrump Pulls Off Miracle Of A Lifetime — It’s Permanently Open
-
Latest4 weeks agoUT Judge Drops Bombshell In Charlie Kirk Killer Case
