Latest
Jewish student says campus antisemitism and London arson attacks show Britain is failing its Jewish community
Being a Jewish student in Britain today means living a kind of double life. I go to lectures. I take exams. I navigate seminar rooms and library queues like any other student. But unlike most of my peers, I do all of this while calculating: am I in danger because my Star of David or Kippah (Skull cap) is visible? Will speaking up in this discussion make me a target? Is today the day they’ll be a demonstration outside?
Going to university is supposed to be a student’s main job. Right now, for many British Jewish students, it feels like a side gig — squeezed in around the exhausting, full-time business of simply being Jewish on campus.
My great-grandmother was Lily Ebert. She arrived at Auschwitz at just 20 years old. In a single day, her mother, her younger sister, her youngest brother and over one hundred members of her extended family were murdered — gassed and cremated, their ashes scattered with no grave, no place to mourn. That was July 1944.
She survived. She came to Britain to rebuild her life, and she did more than survive; she thrived. She built a large and loving family: ten grandchildren, thirty-eight great-grandchildren and even a great-great-grandchild in her final year. She believed Britain would be a safe haven. A place where her family could live openly and proudly as Jews. A country that has learned the lessons of history.
For decades, she traveled across the U.K. speaking in schools, and in her later years she used social media to warn young people that the Holocaust did not begin with violence. It began with words. With small actions. With a shifting atmosphere.
In her final months before she passed away in October 2024, my great-grandmother was horrified. Horrified to see the country she had trusted — after the greatest crime in history, beginning to fail at its most basic duty.
She was right to be horrified. And this week, her warnings feel more urgent than ever.
WESTERN LEADERS MUST CONFRONT ISLAMIST-INSPIRED ANTISEMITIC VIOLENCE BEFORE IT TARGETS EVERYONE
British counterterrorism police are now investigating a wave of arson attacks against Jewish sites across London — four in as many days — probing whether Iranian proxies are responsible. Two synagogues and a Jewish charity were torched. And an Iran-linked group threatening to fly drones carrying hazardous substances at the Israeli embassy.
This all coming only a few weeks after ambulances belonging to a Jewish charity were set alight in Golders Green — one of the most Jewish areas in the U.K. Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis has warned that “a sustained campaign of violence and intimidation against the Jewish community of the U.K. is gathering momentum.”
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has expressed surprise and called the attacks “abhorrent.” But how can he possibly claim surprise? If you tolerate chants of “Globalize the Intifada,” don’t be surprised when the Intifada is globalized.
And throwing money at the problem simply is not a solution. You cannot pay your way out of an Intifada. And we cannot continue to besiege ourselves with security – living behind ever thicker doors and higher fences with barbed wire.
SIGN UP FOR ANTISEMITISM EXPOSED NEWSLETTER
This violence doesn’t begin with arson. It begins with ideology — and until Britain starts tackling the ideology, no amount of policing or security will stop the flames.
That means banning Iran’s IRGC, who may well be behind this very campaign of attacks. And it means confronting the Muslim Brotherhood, who are radicalizing young people across this country — on campuses, in mosques, in community centers — and may well be recruiting the people lighting these fires.
And it starts closer to home too, on campuses like mine, where week after week, masked demonstrators flood university spaces, chanting slogans that go far beyond political protest into something far darker. Jewish students are singled out in lectures, booed, shouted down, accused of being “baby killers” simply for being Jewish. Many now tuck away their Star of David necklaces and think twice before speaking up in seminars. A Jewish professor had his lecture stormed by masked protesters who screamed abuse, branded him a “war criminal,” and — according to witnesses — threatened to behead him. His only crime was being Jewish and refusing to be intimidated.
And it is not just coming from the students. Too often, academics themselves are part of the problem. On my own campus, the medieval blood libel — the conspiracy that Jews use non-Jewish blood in their rituals — was repeated to students as fact, at one of supposedly the best universities in the U.K.
Beyond campus: an NHS doctor posts “gas the Jews” online and faces no meaningful consequences. Jewish artists are quietly dropped from programs. Jewish events are canceled without explanation. Protests where chants cross into open hatred are allowed to continue unchecked by police.
Individually, each moment can be explained away. Together, they reveal a slow and steady normalization of dangerous Jew-hatred.
In the past year alone, the U.K. recorded the highest number of violent antisemitic assaults per capita anywhere outside of Israel — roughly one for every 2,500 Jews. Jewish schools have warned students not to wear visible symbols on their commute. Jewish teenagers have been assaulted on public transport. Every Jewish institution now sits behind security barriers, guards and locked doors. We are a community under siege.
My great-grandmother spent her life warning that these things begin not with violence, but with silence. With small capitulations. With institutions that hedge, qualify and reach for the language of “context” and “balance” — as if balance is possible when a minority is being targeted.
Britain has a choice. It can honor the lessons it claims to have learned. Or it can allow that silence to continue — and discover, too late, where silence leads.
My great-grandmother, Lily Ebert, survived Auschwitz. She did not survive to see Britain become the country she fled.
Latest
Garret Anderson’s cause of death revealed as acute necrotizing pancreatitis: report
Former MLB outfielder Garret Anderson died of “acute necrotizing pancreatitis,” local reports citing the Orange County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office said.
The Los Angeles Angels announced the former star outfielder died late last week at the age of 53.
“Acute necrotizing pancreatitis” is a condition in which part of the pancreas dies, according to Cedars-Sinai. The California Post reported his death was ruled natural.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
A three-time All-Star, Anderson is in the conversation for the greatest Angel in franchise history, nearing the top of the leaderboard in many stats.
“Garret will forever hold a special place in the hearts of Angels fans for his professionalism, class, and loyalty throughout his career and beyond,” the team said in a social media post. “We extend our heartfelt condolences to the entire Anderson family.”
A call was made for “medical aid” to Anderson’s home in the early afternoon of April 16 after Anderson suffered a medical emergency. The Angels announced his death the next day.
MAMDANI TAKES ‘CURSE OF THE MAMBINO’ ON THE CHIN AS METS’ 11-GAME SKID SETS FRANCHISE RECORD
Anderson made his MLB debut with the California Angels in 1994 before becoming a true threat in the early 2000s. From 2002 to 2005, Anderson was named to all three of his All-Star Games, leading the majors with 56 doubles in 2002 and the American League in that same category with 49 the following season.
He is the franchise leader in hits, RBIs, doubles, and games played. His .296 average with the team is also the third-highest behind Vladimir Guerrero and Rod Carew, and he is second in runs with 1,024, behind only Mike Trout.
Perhaps the biggest hit of his career was his three-run double in Game 7 of that World Series, which made the score 4-1 Angels in the bottom of the third inning. That score would be the final.
Anderson was twice named a Silver Slugger and was inducted into the team’s Hall of Fame in 2016.
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Latest
ESPN reporter unloads on the nasty part of the NFL Draft
Happy NFL Draft Eve to all who celebrate! And, by the way, that’s all of you, because the NFL is king and even something as silly as a draft brings in more eyeballs than most other live sporting events.
Say what you want about Roger Goodell, but the guy knows how to market his product. Fair is fair.
ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!
Anyway, the NFL Draft is always one of the biggest nights on the calendar, believe it or not. I remember when it used to be a two-day event on Saturday and Sunday only.
Remember those days? When it would start at noon and run for eight straight hours? Amazing.
It got too big a few years ago, and, naturally, the first round got moved to the prime time slot on Thursday night. It’s on 14 different channels now, with 14 different broadcasts. Again, it’s a monster event.
And ESPN’s Peter Schrager, a veteran in the NFL reporter world, has a plea for anyone watching tomorrow night: Stay off your phones!
“Would you watch a reality show if, three minutes before the end of the show, they tell you who is being eliminated?”
Amen, Peter. Preach! No, I wouldn’t. Neither would you. The NFL Draft is one giant reality show. It’s why we watch everything like hawks. The facial expressions. The green room. The WAGs. All of it. It’s a content machine.
But Schrager — again, a veteran reporter — didn’t stop there. He later divulged just how easy it is for insiders to get access to the pick ahead of time. Apparently, it’s not as impressive as you’d think.
“The NFL requires that name to be sent to them, and the entire league gets that name three minutes before the pick is made,” he said. “Anyone who’s got a credential has one source in the league, and that one source, whether it be from the 32 teams, or the league office, or an agent, they have access to the picks 90 seconds before they’re announced.
NFL DRAFT EMOTIONAL REACTIONS: ROOKIES REALIZING THEIR DREAM CAME TRUE PULLS AT FANS’ HEARTSTRINGS
“There is no valor in spoiling an NFL draft pick.”
Bingo! If you happen to have some actual scoop — like the pick 10 minutes ahead of time — go for it. That’s fine. That’s fair. If you have sources that deep in the business, you deserve to break it.
But if you’re getting the same info everyone else is getting, and just tweeting out the same exact thing everyone else is tweeting … come on. What’s the point? To spoil it for everyone watching? Seems silly.
Sure, there’s also the argument that we (the viewer) could just put the phone down and watch. It’s rare nowadays, outside of Augusta for a week out of the year. But, we could also just put the phones down and not be spoiled, either. As far as I know, nobody is forcing you to scroll social media for three hours with the NFL Draft on in the background.
If they are, blink twice!
Regardless, it’s interesting to see how insiders get their info. Sure, there’s a Russini joke somewhere in there, but I ain’t making it!
Happy NFL Draft Day Eve.
Latest
Caroline Leavitt Out — Her Replacement Has Been Named
The most visible figure in the White House briefing room is expected to step back temporarily in the coming months. Karoline Leavitt, who became the youngest press secretary in U.S. history, is expecting her second child, a daughter, due in May.
Her anticipated leave has sparked speculation in Washington over who may handle briefing duties during her absence, with several possible successors emerging from within the press office.
Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly is widely seen as a leading internal candidate. She joined the White House in January after serving in senior communications roles at the Republican National Committee and in the House of Representatives.
Kelly also serves as a special assistant to Donald Trump, a role that places her close to senior decision-making within the administration. Her background also extends beyond politics. In 2019, Kelly was crowned Miss State Fair of Virginia, a title she used to encourage civic engagement among younger Americans.
“In today’s polarized political climate, it is our job to step up to the plate and work to ensure the government we receive is a good one,” she told the *Fairfax Times*.
“It is my goal as Miss State Fair of Virginia to show young people that, contrary to what they might believe, we do have a voice and it’s about time we used it,” Kelly, a graduate of Auburn University, added.
Assistant Press Secretary Taylor Rogers is also viewed as a possible option. A graduate of Clemson University, she joined the White House at the start of Trump’s second term after spending nearly two years at the Republican National Committee.
Rogers has reportedly worked closely with Press Secretary Leavitt, including appearances in the Oval Office, and maintains an active social media presence documenting her role in the administration.
Regional Press Secretary Liz Huston is another potential candidate. A graduate of Indiana University, she joined the administration from StateRAMP, where she worked as a program manager following an internship.
Leavitt has not publicly announced a formal timeline for stepping back from daily briefing duties, but she has shared personal updates.
According to the *Daily Mail*, Leavitt recently celebrated her baby shower and posted photos from the event, including one with her mother, Erin, and close friends.
“My beautiful friends threw me a beautiful baby shower, and I couldn’t be more grateful,” she wrote. “I feel blessed to have so many strong and loving women in my life and can’t believe we will welcome our little lady into the world in a few weeks.”
In December, Leavitt announced on Instagram that she and her husband, Nicholas Riccio, are expecting a girl. She described the news as “the greatest Christmas gift we could ever ask for.”
“My husband and I are thrilled to grow our family and can’t wait to watch our son become a big brother,” Leavitt wrote. The couple’s first child, a son named Niko, was born in July 2024.
Leavitt also thanked the administration’s leadership when announcing her pregnancy, crediting President Trump and Chief of Staff Susie Wiles with building “a pro-family environment in the White House.”
She ended the post with a note of excitement: “2026 is going to be a great year, and I’m so excited to be a girl mom.”
After the announcement, Trump’s daughter-in-law Lara Trump told Fox News that Leavitt had no plans to leave the administration. “Karoline Leavitt is a machine, she’s going nowhere,” Lara told host Lisa Boothe, adding that Leavitt quickly returned to the Trump campaign after the birth of her son last year.
-
Latest1 week agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News2 weeks agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News6 days agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Latest1 week agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News1 week agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
News1 week agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Latest2 weeks agoMelania Gets Huge Surprise 24 Hours After Making Epstein Announcement
-
News1 week agoFar Left Democrat ‘Squad’ Member LOSES — She’s Out
