Latest
My friend Charlie Kirk saw the danger of the SPLC long before its indictment
Last week, the Department of Justice unsealed 11 indictments against the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), charging the organization with wire fraud, conspiracy, and making false statements to a federally insured bank. At the heart of the alleged scheme was a shocking operation in which the SPLC paid “informants” embedded inside the very extremist groups it claimed to oppose, including the Nazi Party of America, the KKK and Aryan Nations. The indictments reveal these characters to be more than just moles, but rather the leaders, organizers and key influencers that make these groups work.
As a conservative, I’ve watched these revelations with a sense of righteous vindication. For years, those of us on the right have viewed the SPLC as a caricature of left-wing overreach and moral panic, but we also shouldn’t dismiss its poisonous influence in progressive circles. Saturday’s failed assassination attempt at the White House Correspondents Association Dinner only underscores the seriousness with which we must approach the radicalizing propaganda network of the far left, especially groups like the SPLC, which wield outsized influence. As history tells us, that influence can come with deadly consequences.
In 2010, the SPLC added the Family Research Council to its widely circulated “Hate Map.” Less than 22 months later, an armed gunman entered the organization’s Washington, D.C., headquarters intending to carry out a mass shooting. He was heroically stopped by a security guard and later admitted he had used the SPLC’s map to select his target.
To understand how the Hate Map came to play such a role, it’s worth revisiting how the SPLC rose to prominence. Founded in 1971, the organization built its reputation through litigation aimed at advancing desegregation, expanding minority voter representation in the South and dismantling organized Klan activities. Fortunately for the country, but unfortunately for the SPLC, by the 1990s, its preferred targets had largely receded from public life. Klan hoods, swastikas and burning crosses were relics of a bygone era.
This should have been celebrated by the SPLC, but instead, it represented an existential threat. Business was drying up. New targets were needed to satiate the worst fears of its generous donors still eager to cosplay as feted activists from the civil rights heyday.
So in 2000, the SPLC created the Hate Map, an interactive tool that allowed prospective donors to click through and see just how much “hate” was lurking in every corner of the country, probably in a neighborhood near you.
The map proved to be brilliant marketing. Filled with red — the color of hate and the Republican Party — the Hate Map was visual confirmation bias for the NPR donor class that wanted to believe the only true evil remaining in the world was white supremacy.
SPLC FACES BLOWBACK FROM ‘HATE MAP’ TARGETS AFTER DOJ FRAUD INDICTMENT
But the SPLC soon discovered it could raise even more money by broadening the definition of “hate.” According to the SPLC, these extremists existed only because a broader network of mainstream conservative and Christian organizations provided the requisite permission structure for them. Groups opposing abortion or defending traditional marriage were added to the list. Over time, the map included organizations like Alliance Defending Freedom, Moms for Liberty, PragerU and yes, Turning Point USA (TPUSA). The line between violent extremism and ordinary ideological disagreement was deliberately blurred.
But the SPLC still had a problem. There just weren’t enough real, outward signs of white supremacy to sustain the business model. So it decided to manufacture some. Beginning around 2014, the organization reportedly funneled millions of dollars through shell companies to pay extremist leaders, organizers and recruiters to subsidize the very stereotypes of 1960s-style white supremacy that had originally made the group famous.
The return on investment was extraordinary. In 2017, immediately after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville — an event we now know was organized with the help of an SPLC informant paid roughly $270,000 — the organization’s revenues nearly tripled, jumping from $51 million to over $133 million in one year. Major corporations like JPMorgan and MGM, along with high-profile donors such as Tim Cook of Apple and George and Amal Clooney, poured millions into its coffers. As of 2024, the organization reportedly maintains an endowment of well over $700 million.
DAVID MARCUS: LIBERALS’ GET-TRUMP ‘FINE PEOPLE’ HOAX WAS WAY WORSE THAN WE THOUGHT
I remember when my friend and colleague Charlie Kirk first learned that TPUSA had been added to the Hate Map in the spring of 2025. His initial reaction was characteristically defiant: “Of course. What took them so long?” We laughed at the absurdity. But later, when we were alone, he admitted he was worried about our students. He was used to the smears; they were not. Charlie knew it only took one lunatic to change everything.
On Sept. 10, 2025, his worst fears were tragically realized.
Exactly three months and 19 days after the SPLC fraudulently included Turning Point USA in its so-called Hate Map, a left-wing assassin killed Charlie, saying, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.”
WILLIAM BENNETT: WHAT CHARLIE KIRK’S MURDER TELLS US ABOUT THE AMERICAN MIND
I cannot prove the SPLC’s targeting of TPUSA directly caused Charlie’s assassination. But indirectly? Without question. The organization’s decades-long campaign helped turn “hate” into the ultimate catch-all slur wielded by powerful institutions to dismiss, dehumanize and ultimately justify violence against conservatives.
Real violent extremism exists in America, but the data increasingly shows it is far more common on the political left. Just days after Charlie’s assassination, a YouGov/The Economist poll found that nearly 30% of self-described progressives ages 18–39 believe violence is justified to achieve political goals, compared with only about 5% of conservatives in the same age group. The SPLC and its allies were so successful at selling the myth of pervasive right-wing “hate” that far too many on the left became convinced that conservatives deserved whatever violence came their way.
So what needs to happen now?
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
The entire SPLC edifice must be dismantled, all the way down to the studs. Its financial networks should be exposed and severed. Donors should consider revenues from the SPLC’s fraudulent scheme to be blood money and demand refunds. Responsible institutions must immediately disavow any association with the group. Those involved in the alleged fraud should face full prosecution.
In his final text message to White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, Charlie wrote about the urgent need to dismantle the networks and financial infrastructure that enable left-wing violence.
The DOJ indictments are the first real step toward achieving his vision.
Let’s hope they are just the first of many more steps, including criminal indictments of the leaders responsible. They must pay for what they’ve done if America stands any chance of overcoming the rise of left-wing political violence.
Culture
Cracker Barrel Fans Outraged Again After NEW Major Change
Cracker Barrel built its reputation on comfort food, Southern tradition, and a menu customers could count on for decades.
That’s exactly why loyal diners are still fuming as the restaurant chain continues removing many of the classic dishes that helped make it a household name.
For years, customers have pleaded with the Tennessee-based chain to restore fan favorites that quietly disappeared from the menu, including black-eyed peas, fried haddock, red-eye gravy, fried chicken livers, and perhaps the most mourned item of all—the Sunrise Sampler.
For many longtime patrons, the Sunrise Sampler wasn’t just another breakfast. It was the breakfast.
The hearty platter came loaded with eggs, grits, fried apples, hash brown casserole, sausage, bacon, country ham, and biscuits with gravy—giving diners a taste of nearly everything Cracker Barrel had to offer without having to piece together a meal item by item.
“I noticed a while back that Cracker Barrel removed the GOAT of all breakfasts, the Sunrise Sampler, from the menu,” Josh Cooper, owner of Cooper’s Next Level BBQ in Tallahassee, Florida, told Fox News Digital. “You used to get a little bit of everything without breaking the bank.”
The meal hasn’t completely disappeared—but recreating it now comes with a catch.
Customers must order every component separately, turning what was once an affordable breakfast favorite into a considerably more expensive order.
“Now, in order to get that same teaser touch from the Sunrise Sampler, you have to order it all à la carte, which costs around $25 for the same great meal,” he said. “Blasphemy!”
Fox News Digital reached out to Cracker Barrel for comment.
The growing frustration over disappearing menu items comes after the company already faced a wave of backlash for attempting to modernize its image.
Last year, Cracker Barrel sparked outrage among longtime customers after unveiling a redesigned logo and updated restaurant interiors that many believed stripped away the rustic charm that had long defined the brand.
The changes were part of a sweeping $700 million overhaul across more than 660 locations, including menu revisions and a cleaner, less cluttered dining room design.
The company ultimately reversed course following widespread criticism, but many loyal customers say the damage had already been done.
The leadership shakeup continued last week when Cracker Barrel announced that CEO Julie Masino will step down on Aug. 10.
Former Bloomin’ Brands CEO David Deno is slated to take over.
For many customers, however, the issue extends far beyond a logo or a fresh coat of paint.
They believe corporate leadership has steadily chipped away at the very traditions that made Cracker Barrel stand apart from countless other restaurant chains.
Cooper said companies often underestimate the emotional attachment customers have to longtime menu favorites.
People are “asking for comfort and nostalgia.”
“The reality is that nostalgia matters. And when you remove popular items without controlling the narrative or managing customers’ expectations, you are bound to have upset patrons,” he said.
“Whether it’s due to rising food costs, kitchen timing or any other reason, it’s important to communicate with the people who put you on the map in the first place. Communication matters.”
Rachel Love, a self-described Cracker Barrel enthusiast from Tennessee, said one discontinued favorite remains at the top of her wish list.
“I absolutely loved the black-eyed peas, and I’m so glad they’re getting some attention,” Love told Fox News Digital. “They were one of my favorite sides and always felt like such a classic part of the Cracker Barrel experience.”
Love also hopes the restaurant revives its baked apple dumpling, describing it as “the perfect comfort dessert” for a brand built on old-fashioned hospitality.
To her, the debate is about much more than a handful of discontinued recipes.
“People aren’t just asking for old menu items — they’re asking for the comfort and nostalgia that came with them,” she said.
“Sometimes bringing back one classic dish means more to loyal customers than introducing several new ones.”
That may be the lesson Cracker Barrel continues to learn the hard way.
Customers aren’t asking the chain to reinvent itself.
They’re asking it to remember what made it successful.
They want the front porch.
They want the country store.
They want the breakfasts, the classic sides, and the timeless comfort food that turned Cracker Barrel into an American institution.
For many loyal diners, nostalgia isn’t a weakness.
It’s the brand.
Latest
Mamdani Kicked Out — He’s Livid After Latest Announcement
Backlash against New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani continues to mount, with the Democratic Socialist facing another public rebuke after reportedly being denied the opportunity to speak at the funeral of a U.S. Army soldier killed during an Iranian missile attack.
According to multiple reports, Mamdani attended Friday’s funeral for Army Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad in Queens but remained silent throughout the service after the soldier’s family reportedly chose not to have him address mourners.
Rampersad was one of three American service members killed in Jordan during an Iranian attack on July 17.
The funeral was held at a church in Ozone Park, where elected officials, community leaders, family members and fellow mourners gathered to honor the 28-year-old soldier’s sacrifice.
According to the New York Post, Mamdani appeared to review prepared remarks on an iPad while other dignitaries spoke, but his name was never called.
A source familiar with the funeral told The Post the decision came directly from Rampersad’s family, which reportedly wanted to keep politics out of the ceremony.
The family chose not to have Mayor Zohran Mamdani speak in an effort to avoid what the source described as “political distractions.”
After the funeral concluded, the mayor’s office released the remarks Mamdani had planned to deliver.
“It is often said that our fallen ‘gave their tomorrows for our today,’” Mamdani planned to say.
“Sergeant Rampersad had tomorrows waiting for her: birthdays, ordinary mornings, evenings spent with her loved ones,” his remarks continued.
“But she gave every one of them up so that we could have ours — so that we could stand here today, safe and protected,” he was to say.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, however, did address those gathered and offered an emotional tribute to the fallen soldier.
“I feel after reading and admiring this woman from a distance, I feel like she could be one of my daughters,” Hochul said.
Other speakers included Ozone Park Residents Block Association President Sam Esposito, state Sen. Joseph Addabbo Jr., and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards.
According to the Department of War, Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad, 28, of Ozone Park, New York, was killed in action during an enemy attack at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.
U.S. Central Command said Rampersad and two fellow service members were killed while American and coalition forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks.
The other fallen Americans were identified as 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas.
All three were deployed to Jordan in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, the international mission to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
Rampersad served with the 1st Battalion, 57th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52d Air Defense Artillery Brigade, 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command in Ansbach, Germany.
She worked as a 25U Signal Operations Support Specialist, according to the Department of War.
One person who attended the funeral told the newspaper the mayor appeared visibly upset after realizing he would not be invited to speak.
“He looked over at his staff, frustrated and seemed angry that he didn’t speak,” the source told the Post.
The attendee said Mamdani eventually understood that his name would not be called, glanced toward members of his staff, and put away the tablet that reportedly contained his prepared remarks.
Another source cited by the newspaper said the decision reflected the wishes of Rampersad’s family, describing them as politically conservative and supportive of President Donald Trump.
“The family is more conservative and wanted to limit any political distractions,” the source told the Post.
Neither Mamdani’s office nor members of the Rampersad family have publicly confirmed the account explaining why the mayor was not invited to speak.
Although he never addressed the congregation during the service, the mayor’s office later publicly released the remarks he had prepared, bringing attention to a moment that underscored the growing political controversy surrounding New York City’s new mayor.
Latest
GOP Just Passed It 232-288 — Pelosi And AOC Lose It On House Floor
The House of Representatives delivered a major victory this week for Americans with disabilities who want the opportunity to work instead of being trapped by a broken federal bureaucracy.
In a bipartisan vote, lawmakers approved legislation aimed at dismantling long-standing barriers within the Social Security Disability Insurance program that critics say have discouraged work and punished self-sufficiency for decades.
H.R. 8884, the **Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act**, sponsored by Rep. Austin Scott, R-Ga., passed the House by a vote of 232-188 and now heads to the Senate, where it has been referred to the Committee on Finance.
The legislation restores an important tool that the Social Security Administration lost when its demonstration authority expired in 2022.
Under the bill, the SSA would once again be authorized to test practical reforms under the Social Security Disability Insurance program through Dec. 31, 2030, with demonstration projects continuing through the end of 2031.
Rather than permanently rewriting federal law, the agency would be able to pilot innovative approaches designed to help beneficiaries who are able and willing return to the workforce.
The legislation includes significant safeguards. Participation would be entirely voluntary, and no participant could receive less total income as a result of joining one of the demonstration projects.
Supporters say those protections make the bill a common-sense effort to modernize a system that has too often discouraged Americans from pursuing employment.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., argued the current system is failing many of the very people it was designed to help.
“With over 60 percent of Social Security Disability Insurance recipients expressing an interest in returning to the workforce but less than one percent leaving the program because of a successful return to work each year, the Social Security Administration’s complex rules and regulations are clearly failing to deliver for too many Americans,” Smith said.
“Giving the SSA the authority to test innovative ways to better help disabled Americans pursue gainful employment is pure common sense, and this legislation goes a step further to ensure participation in any new system is both voluntary and will not reduce a beneficiary’s total income,” Smith added.
Smith pointed to what he described as a massive disconnect between Americans who want to work and those who are actually able to do so under the current system.
For years, disability recipients have warned that attempting to return to work can trigger a maze of complicated regulations, overpayment disputes, benefit cliffs, and uncertainty that ultimately makes taking a job financially risky.
Rather than encouraging independence, critics say the current structure often rewards staying on the sidelines.
Supporters argue H.R. 8884 takes a fundamentally different approach.
Instead of expanding government programs or imposing sweeping permanent reforms without evidence, the legislation gives the Social Security Administration the flexibility to test targeted solutions, evaluate the results, and determine what actually helps Americans reenter the workforce before making lasting policy changes.
Backers say the measure reflects a core conservative principle: government assistance should serve as a bridge to opportunity—not a permanent barrier to self-reliance.
The bill recognizes that having a disability does not automatically mean someone is unable to work and that federal policy should encourage those who are capable of seeking employment rather than penalizing them for trying.
The legislation also broadens the agency’s authority to include additional populations, including blind Americans, expanding the reach of future demonstration projects.
The proposal advanced through the House with bipartisan support after clearing the Ways and Means Committee, where lawmakers from both parties acknowledged that the current disability system leaves too many Americans behind.
Still, Republicans led the charge, arguing that practical reforms backed by measurable results are preferable to expanding entitlement programs or making permanent changes without first proving they work.
The bill now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers will decide whether to send it to President Donald Trump’s desk.
Supporters are urging swift action, arguing that restoring the SSA’s demonstration authority represents a fiscally responsible, low-cost reform that could help thousands of Americans regain the dignity, purpose, and financial independence that comes with meaningful work.
If enacted, the Social Security Administration would once again have the authority to launch carefully monitored pilot programs designed to improve employment outcomes, while reporting requirements would provide transparency and accountability as Congress evaluates which reforms deserve permanent consideration.
-
Economy4 months agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
Economy4 months agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Economy4 months agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
Economy4 months agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
Culture2 months agoMichelle Obama Drops Nasty Bomb About ‘Useless’ Daughter
-
Economy2 months agoPrayers Pour In After Fox Host Dies: ‘Senseless Murder’
-
Latest2 months agoFox News Stuns With Announcement About 5 Fired Hosts
-
Economy4 months agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
