Connect with us

Latest

Martina Navratilova says Billie Jean King’s trans-athlete stance ‘doesn’t square’ with her own words

Published

on

Martina Navratilova wants Billie Jean King to explain herself.

King is one of the most important figures in the history of women’s sports, a tennis icon who helped build the modern women’s game and spent decades fighting for equal opportunity, equal pay and respect for female athletes.

But King has also publicly supported trans-identifying biological male athletes competing in girls’ and women’s sports.

In a 2025 interview with The Telegraph ahead of Wimbledon, King called the broader transgender-athlete debate in sports “a nightmare” and said people should listen to transgender people’s stories and make them feel included.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

That position has frustrated Navratilova, another tennis legend and longtime advocate of gay rights and women’s sports, because King has also publicly acknowledged the physical differences between men and women.

Asked how King could reconcile those two positions, Navratilova said the contradiction is obvious.

“I honestly don’t know because it doesn’t square,” Navratilova told OutKick.

Navratilova was responding to a clip of King discussing the obvious physical differences between men and women. In the clip, King said men are generally bigger and stronger, have different skeletal systems and bigger hearts, and that women never claimed they were physically the same as men.

That’s the entire reason women’s sports exist in the first place.

In 2020, King joined nearly 200 athletes in supporting a friend-of-the-court brief against an Idaho law that barred trans-identifying male athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports.

“There is no place in any sport for discrimination of any kind,” King said at the time. “I’m proud to support all transgender athletes who simply want the access and opportunity to compete in the sport they love.”

That’s the gap Navratilova is pressing.

“I think she thinks that they play fair and square, meaning males identify as women, take all the hormones and do everything, like Renée Richards did 50 years ago,” Navratilova said. “And that it’s just nice to include everybody.”

But Navratilova said the issue can’t be reduced to kindness or inclusion.

TENNIS STAR ARYNA SABALENKA SAYS FEMALE ATHLETES FACING TRANS COMPETITORS ‘JUST NOT FAIR TO WOMEN’

She offered a hypothetical scenario: a high school boys basketball team holds tryouts, 10 boys make the team, and five boys who don’t make the boys team then try out for the girls team. If they make it, which they almost certainly would, five girls lose their spots.

“That’s not equality,” Navratilova said. “That’s a total takeover.”

And it’s not just about who wins, she said. It’s about roster spots, podium spots, awards, prize money, privacy, safety and the entire purpose of female-only categories.

For Navratilova, the answer starts with keeping sex-based boundaries intact.

“The solution is obvious,” she told OutKick. “No male bodies in women’s sports and no male bodies in women’s sex-based spaces for many different reasons, not the least of which is women’s rights to safety, dignity and fairness and privacy.”

Navratilova said her private conversations with King have made King’s public position even more frustrating.

“Billie Jean has repeatedly told me over the last four or five years that she would love to talk to me about it, that she defers to me because I know a lot more about it than she does,” Navratilova said.

But Navratilova said the conversations she expected, never really happened.

“Without talking to me really and listening to what my points were, she just went her way and put out the statement by her and the Women’s Sports Foundation about inclusion and all this stuff,” Navratilova said.

That, Navratilova said, is what surprised her most.

“I don’t think she really has heard the other side of the debate, so to speak,” Navratilova said.

Navratilova said she wants King to answer the question directly.

“Please get Billie Jean on record,” Navratilova said. “I’d like to know how she explains it because she hasn’t been able to explain it to me.”

OutKick contacted King and the Women’s Sports Foundation seeking comment and offering King an interview. Neither responded.

And Navratilova is not alone.

Nancy Hogshead, a three-time Olympic gold medalist swimmer, civil rights lawyer and former Women’s Sports Foundation president, went even further.

Asked whether King’s comments on male advantages suggested she was starting to come around, Hogshead rejected that premise.

“Oh no, she’s always known that,” Hogshead told OutKick. “She’s a hypocrite, she’s a total hypocrite.”

Hogshead said she could understand confusion several years ago, before more research and high-profile cases brought the issue to the forefront.

Her own view, Hogshead said, was not always what it is now.

“I was in favor of it too,” Hogshead said. “I thought this was about inclusion and nondiscrimination. I thought it was fair.”

That has changed.

“I was wrong,” Hogshead said. “I was dead wrong.”

Hogshead pointed to sex-eligibility disputes involving Caster Semenya, the Lia Thomas case and research on male puberty and athletic performance as part of what caused her to rethink her position.

She said the same evidence should matter for King.

“She knows, but she hasn’t made the connection,” Hogshead said. “As she says, men are faster, stronger, bigger lungs structurally, but hasn’t made the connection of like, oh, so that’s unfair to the girls to have to compete with that.”

Hogshead said her frustration with King and the Women’s Sports Foundation predates the transgender-athlete debate.

“I wouldn’t say I left,” Hogshead said of her 2014 departure from WSF. “I would say I got fired because I would not sign a contract.”

Hogshead alleged the contract would have restricted her from speaking publicly about sexual abuse and harassment involving athletes.

Asked why she believed a women’s sports organization would want to limit her ability to speak on that issue, Hogshead pointed to what she described as King’s aversion to backlash.

“Because Billie Jean didn’t want to go into any room and face hostility or having somebody be against her,” Hogshead said.

Hogshead connected that episode to the current fight over transgender athletes in women’s sports.

“I think it’s more political for the same reason, for the exact same reason that she didn’t wanna be involved in the sexual abuse issue or she didn’t want the Women’s Sports Foundation to be involved,” Hogshead said. “It’s hard to be the tip of the spear.”

To Hogshead, both fights come back to the same issue: whether women’s sports leaders are willing to take unpopular stands when women and girls need defending.

OutKick separately asked the Women’s Sports Foundation whether Hogshead’s role ended because she refused to sign a contract restricting her from speaking publicly about sexual abuse in sports and whether King was involved in or aware of that contract decision. WSF did not respond before publication.

That leaves a central question unanswered.

If men have physical advantages over women, and King says they do, then why should biological males who identify as women be allowed into female categories?

Navratilova’s position is especially notable because she has personal history with Renée Richards, the transgender tennis player who sued to compete in the women’s draw at the 1977 U.S. Open.

Richards later coached Navratilova.

That history matters because Navratilova didn’t come to the issue as an opponent of inclusion.

“Because of Renée, I was completely all-in for inclusion,” Navratilova said. “Most of us welcomed Renée into the fold.”

CHRIS EVERT DEFENDS MARTINA NAVRATILOVA ON TRANS ATHLETES: ‘SCIENCE DOESN’T LIE’

But Navratilova said Richards competed at a very different moment and under very different circumstances.

Richards was 43 and not in peak playing shape when competing against women, Navratilova said. At the time, Richards was essentially a one-off case.

“It was only one because she won the right to compete in a court of law,” Navratilova said. “There were no others. Even if there were other transgender people, they would have to sue for the right to compete.”

That has changed.

In recent years, trans-identifying biological male athletes have competed in women’s and girls’ sports across the country, from high school track and field to college and junior college volleyball to cycling, swimming and other sports.

Navratilova said the change forced her to reconsider the issue in a way she did not have to when Richards was the only example. But, more importantly, Richards also has a new perspective on the issue.

“Renée herself now says she should not have been able to compete,” Navratilova said. “She realizes now she had an advantage.”

Richards made a similar argument in a 2024 position paper published by Sports Illustrated in 2025. “I believe that having gone through male puberty disqualifies transgender women from the female category in sports,” Richards wrote, adding that a “retained physical advantage persists” even after testosterone reduction

That’s why Navratilova says it’s no longer enough to rely on the language of inclusion without answering the competitive question.

“Boys are faster, stronger, quicker than girls,” Navratilova said. “And so, if it doesn’t matter who wins, why do they have to compete as a girl? If they feel like a girl, they can still compete with the boys if they don’t care where they end up. Why is it the girls that need to suck it up?”

Navratilova came out publicly as a lesbian in 1981 and became one of the most prominent openly gay athletes in the world.

That’s part of what makes the backlash against her so striking.

Navratilova has been called homophobic, transphobic, bigoted and worse for her position on women’s sports. She told OutKick the attacks are especially frustrating because many of the people attacking her don’t know what it was like for gay athletes when she came out.

Asked what she makes of being called homophobic, Navratilova dismissed the idea.

“It’s just stupid,” Navratilova said. “I came out before they were born, so they don’t know what it was like.”

Navratilova said the criticism from within the LGBTQ advocacy world has been painful because she still believes in equal rights.

“I respect everybody’s right to human rights, equal rights everywhere,” Navratilova said.

But she said equal rights do not include the right for male-bodied athletes to enter female sports or female-only spaces.

“You do not have a right to come into my space,” Navratilova said.

That doesn’t mean the verbal attacks haven’t stung.

“What does it make me feel like? Just sad,” Navratilova said. “Just really sad that they would just name-call rather than have a discussion and totally discount what I went through and twist it around.”

King’s legacy in women’s sports is undeniable.

She fought for women to have opportunities, respect, prize money and a professional tour of their own. She famously beat Bobby Riggs in the “Battle of the Sexes,” a moment that became larger than tennis and helped cement King as a symbol of women’s equality.

But that history is exactly why Navratilova and Hogshead say King’s current position deserves scrutiny.

Women’s sports were not created because women lacked talent, discipline or courage. They were created because biological sex matters in athletics.

King knows that. She has said so herself.

That’s why Navratilova wants an answer.

How does King square a lifetime spent fighting for women’s sports with a position that allows biological males to compete against females?

So far, King hasn’t answered that question for OutKick. And according to Navratilova, she hasn’t answered it for her, either.

Continue Reading

Economy

Warren Buffett Makes Shocking Announcement

Published

on

Warren Buffett Makes Shocking Announcement

An extraordinary era in American business is coming to an end.

Warren Buffett is officially stepping away from the chairman’s seat at Berkshire Hathaway, closing another chapter in a remarkable run that stretched for more than half a century and turned the legendary investor into one of the most influential figures in modern business.

Berkshire announced Friday that Buffett, 96, will become chairman emeritus effective immediately. He isn’t cutting ties with the company entirely, however, and will remain on Berkshire’s board of directors.

Taking his place as chairman will be his son, Howard Buffett.

Howard has served as a Berkshire director since 1993 and has spent decades leading the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. His elevation to chairman represents another major piece of a succession plan Berkshire has been preparing for years.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

For Warren Buffett, the announcement marks the latest — and one of the most significant — steps away from the company he spent decades building into a corporate powerhouse.

Buffett had served as Berkshire Hathaway’s chairman since 1970.

During that time, he oversaw an extraordinary transformation, taking what had once been a struggling textile business and building it into a massive conglomerate with operations spanning insurance, railroads, energy, manufacturing, retail and services.

His influence over the company’s day-to-day operations had already begun to diminish.

Buffett stepped down as Berkshire’s chief executive late last year, turning control of the company over to longtime lieutenant Greg Abel.

Now the chairman’s title is changing hands as well.

Friday’s announcement means Berkshire is entering a new era in which Abel runs the company’s operations while Howard Buffett oversees the board.

Warren Buffett, however, isn’t disappearing.

As chairman emeritus, he will remain a director and continue providing his judgment and perspective to the company’s leadership — preserving a connection between Berkshire’s future and the man who shaped its identity for generations.

Following the announcement, Abel paid tribute to the enormous impact Buffett has had on the company.

“Warren’s impact on Berkshire and its owners is without parallel in the history of American business,” Abel said in a statement. “The culture Warren built and the values he championed will remain at the heart of Berkshire, and Howard will be their guardian.”

That culture became almost as famous as Buffett himself.

Rather than chasing every new market trend, Buffett built his reputation around patience, long-term investing, disciplined acquisitions and a straightforward approach to evaluating businesses.

Under his leadership, Berkshire accumulated an enormous portfolio of operating companies while also becoming famous for taking major stock positions in some of America’s most recognizable corporations.

Along the way, Buffett became more than a corporate executive.

His annual shareholder letters, public appearances and Berkshire shareholder meetings turned the Omaha investor into one of the world’s most closely followed voices on investing, business and the American economy.

But the transition away from Buffett has been unfolding for some time.

Last year, Buffett announced that Abel would become Berkshire’s top executive. He later signaled that his own public presence would shrink, including fewer appearances at Berkshire’s annual meeting and an end to writing the company’s annual shareholder letter.

Howard Buffett’s move into the chairman’s position wasn’t unexpected either.

The younger Buffett had long been identified as an important part of Berkshire’s eventual succession structure, with his father previously describing the chairman’s role as a safeguard for the company’s distinctive culture and values once he was no longer overseeing daily operations.

That succession plan is now becoming reality.

Greg Abel is running Berkshire as CEO.

Howard Buffett is taking control of the board as chairman.

And Warren Buffett — after more than five decades at the center of one of the most remarkable corporate transformations in American history — is moving into an advisory role as chairman emeritus.

The legendary investor may still have a seat at the table.

But the company he built is officially moving into its post-Buffett leadership era.

Continue Reading

Culture

Dolly Parton Delivers Stunning Video Message Weeks After Her Death

Published

on

Dolly Parton Delivers Stunning Video Message Weeks After Her Death

Dolly Parton had one final message for the music world — and it was delivered after her death.

The country music legend appeared on screen Wednesday night during the 2026 Americana Honors & Awards, where she was posthumously honored with the Americana Lifetime Achievement Award.

Parton died Aug. 25 at the age of 80 following what was described as a “brief battle with cancer.”

But before her death, Parton had recorded a video accepting the prestigious honor. When it played before the audience Wednesday night, fans were given one more chance to hear from the woman whose unmistakable voice, personality and songwriting helped define generations of American music.

And in classic Dolly fashion, she opened simply.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

“Well, hey, it’s Dolly. I’m honored to be receiving a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Americana Music Association.”

Parton then looked back at where it all began — in Tennessee’s Smoky Mountains, surrounded by the roots music that would eventually help propel her from humble beginnings to worldwide fame.

“I mean, roots music, or what is now called Americana music, is what I grew up playing back in the Smoky Mountains,” Parton continued. “It’s that same music that drew me back to East Tennessee in 1997 to write and record my album, Hungry Again. And that project really opened the door to a series of bluegrass and acoustic albums that changed the course of my career in so many ways.”

Those projects brought Parton back to the acoustic sounds of her childhood while introducing her music to another generation of listeners.

Looking back, Parton recognized just how important that chapter had become.

“Now, new fans discovered these albums, new Americana music communities embraced them, and now looking back at it all, I see this era of my career as a musical renaissance of sorts,” Parton said. “I want to thank everyone at the AMA for recognizing me with this award. It’s a great honor truly, and just know that I will always love you.”

Those final words carried unmistakable weight.

“I will always love you” wasn’t merely a farewell. It was also a poignant reference to one of the most famous songs Parton ever wrote — turning the closing moments of her prerecorded acceptance into an especially emotional goodbye.

The tribute didn’t end there.

Longtime friend and fellow country music icon Emmylou Harris took the stage to remember Parton’s extraordinary journey from a young Tennessee singer with enormous ambitions to one of the most recognizable entertainers in the world.

Harris recalled the pivotal moment in 1967 when Parton joined Porter Wagoner’s television program, an opportunity that helped introduce her to a national audience.

But Harris made clear that Parton was never destined to remain in someone else’s shadow.

“In 1967, Dolly got a good start on her big dream when she landed a gig as the girl singer with Porter Wagoner. Their duets were a hit on the show and on the charts, but Dolly was nobody’s sidekick. She wanted more and she deserved more, and she set out to get it always, always on her own terms,” Harris, 79, said. “And we all know what happened when Dolly set her sights on something.”

What happened was a career that exploded far beyond the boundaries of country music.

Parton became a crossover pop success, a movie star and an internationally recognized entertainer while maintaining the East Tennessee identity that remained central to her public image and music.

Her songwriting alone established an enormous legacy. But Harris reminded the audience that Parton’s talents went far beyond the songs she wrote.

“She was one of our all-time greatest songwriters, but she shined just as brightly on stage,” Harris shared. “She lit up the TV screen and then she, she lit up the movie screen.”

Then there was the personality.

Parton’s ability to move an audience with a song and, moments later, make that same audience laugh became one of the trademarks of her decades in the spotlight.

“Her stunningly beautiful, pure mountain voice could make us cry and then crack us up with a well-aimed, sometimes body joke,” Harris said. “There was nothing Dolly couldn’t do, and so she did it.”

The evening’s tribute ultimately returned to the music.

Brandi Carlile and I’m with Her performed Parton’s “Coat of Many Colors,” one of the songs most closely associated with her upbringing and remarkable journey from the Smoky Mountains to international superstardom.

Parton was honored alongside other recipients at Wednesday’s ceremony, including Led Zeppelin frontman Robert Plant.

But it was Parton’s own prerecorded words that provided one of the night’s most poignant moments.

A final appearance. A final thank-you.

And an ending that could hardly have been more fitting:

“Just know that I will always love you.”

Continue Reading

Latest

Get Ready — Mike Pence Makes Stunning 2028 Announcement

Published

on

Get Ready — Mike Pence Makes Stunning 2028 Announcement

Former Vice President Mike Pence is making his plans for 2028 clear — and another run for the White House apparently isn’t part of them.

After years of political upheaval, a failed 2024 presidential campaign and a dramatic break with President Donald Trump, Pence said this week that he currently has no plans to seek the presidency — or any other elected office — in 2028.

The former vice president addressed his political future during an appearance at the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., where chairman David Rubenstein pressed him about whether voters could see his name on another presidential ballot.

“What I can tell you is that we have no plans,” Pence replied.

Rather than gearing up for another campaign, Pence said his attention is centered on his family and Advancing American Freedom, the conservative policy organization he founded after leaving the White House.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

Pence said he intends to use his public platform to continue advocating for the conservative principles that have defined much of his career, including lower taxes, limited government, reduced regulation, traditional values and opposition to abortion.

“The calling of my life right now is to be a champion for these principles,” Pence said.

The comments put considerable distance between Pence and the emerging 2028 presidential contest, even as Republicans begin looking ahead to the next battle for the White House.

Pence has been down that road before.

In 2023, he launched a Republican presidential campaign that put him directly against Trump, his former running mate and the president he served alongside for four years. But Pence struggled to gain traction and suspended his campaign in October 2023, months before Republican voters began casting primary ballots.

He later declined to endorse Trump in the 2024 election.

Trump ultimately secured the Republican nomination and returned to the White House.

But the political split between the two men goes back much further.

Pence served as Trump’s vice president from 2017 until 2021 after previously serving as Indiana governor and a member of Congress. Their once-close political alliance fractured following the 2020 presidential election and the events surrounding Jan. 6, 2021.

Trump urged Pence, who was presiding over the congressional certification of the Electoral College vote, to reject or delay certification of Joe Biden’s victory.

Pence refused, concluding that the Constitution gave him no authority to do so.

Years later, he remains unapologetic about that decision.

“It was the easiest decision I’ve ever made,” Pence said. “By God’s grace I did my duty that day.”

Since leaving office, Pence has remained active in Republican politics, but increasingly as a voice arguing for a more traditional strain of conservatism as parts of the GOP have embraced populist policies.

Through Advancing American Freedom and his public appearances, Pence has continued promoting free markets, limited government, a strong American role overseas and socially conservative policies.

Earlier this year, he argued that Republicans should determine what principles they want their party to stand for before becoming consumed with the question of who should carry the GOP banner in 2028.

Now Pence appears to be taking himself out of that conversation — at least for the time being.

Notably, he stopped short of declaring that he would never seek public office again. His wording was narrower: He has “no plans” to run in 2028.

For the foreseeable future, however, Pence says his focus is on advancing his political philosophy rather than launching another campaign.

And his willingness to publicly challenge Trump hasn’t disappeared.

Earlier this year, Pence broke with the president over the possibility that people involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot could receive taxpayer-funded compensation.

Speaking with Axios while discussing his book *What Conservatives Believe*, Pence described Jan. 6 as a “tragic day” and drew a firm line when it came to people who committed violence against law enforcement.

“I didn’t agree with the President when he pardoned people who engaged in violence against law enforcement officials,” Pence said.

Then he went further.

“And it would be my hope that anyone who engaged in violence against law enforcement or at the Capitol building would never be rewarded with taxpayers’ money.”

The comments underscored a political divide that has persisted years after Pence left the vice presidency.

For now, Pence appears prepared to remain part of the conservative debate — just not as a candidate in 2028.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal