Latest
Cold case breakthrough solves teen killing after suspect lived free for decades: ‘Better be afraid’
Michigan authorities have identified the man responsible for the murder of 16-year-old Sheri Jo Elliott, putting an end to a four-decades-old cold case and marking the latest crime to be solved using advanced DNA technology.
Roni Collins, a 75-year-old resident of Grand Blanc, has been named as Elliott’s killer, according to the Michigan State Police.
On Nov. 16, 1983, Elliott left her home in Flint to walk to the bus stop and was never seen again.
She was reported missing several hours later when she failed to return home from school.
GENETIC GENEALOGY THAT CAUGHT NOTORIOUS KILLERS NOW USED IN NANCY GUTHRIE CASE
Authorities searched alongside Elliott’s family for several days in an agonizing effort to locate their missing loved one.
“It was terrible. But we went and passed missing signs to everybody you know in the neighborhood and in town and stores would put the missing in the windows,” Elliott’s aunt, Judy Sika, told FOX 66.
Four days after her disappearance, Elliott’s body was discovered in a ditch in nearby Saginaw County.
An autopsy revealed she had been sexually assaulted and shot multiple times, according to authorities.
FOLLOW THE FOX TRUE CRIME TEAM ON X
“You just don’t know what a terrible thing it is in your mind when they tell you they found her body,” Sika told FOX 66. “That was awful.”
However, a break in the case came after the MSP reopened the investigation in 2023 alongside the Western Michigan University Cold Case Program to take a fresh look at the evidence.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
“The students assisted in reorganizing and digitizing decades of investigative material, providing critical support to the renewed investigation,” MSP said in a statement.
The newly reexamined evidence led police to Collins, but not before he died by suicide in January of this year before authorities could obtain a voluntary DNA sample.
Using DNA collected from Collins’ autopsy, investigators “analyzed and conclusively matched evidence recovered from Elliott in 1983, identifying him as the individual responsible for the crime,” MSP said.
The case is only the latest to use forensic genetic genealogy to lead investigators to the individual responsible for a long-unsolved murder.
LISTEN TO THE NEW ‘CRIME & JUSTICE WITH DONNA ROTUNNO’ PODCAST
“They worked up logical family members, and that can be a thousand people that you have to vet and verify who could probably be related to this person,” Tom Myers, a retired FBI forensic agent, told Fox News Digital.
“Then you start to develop who’s the likely person,” Myers added. “It’ll usually come down to three or five people like that. Or sometimes, maybe it’s one person who stands out and then when you crosscut that with somebody who’s been a bad boy their entire life then that’s a good chance that that’s who your person is.”
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? FIND MORE ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
According to Myers, the reality of testing cold case evidence also comes with the possibility that samples may have been damaged or degraded over time. However, the implementation of genetic genealogy has made it easier for investigators to do more, with less.
“They now can get DNA from a single hair strand, versus a strand of hair with a follicle,” Myers said. “In the 1980s to 1990s, it was a nickel-sized stain down to a dime. Now, it’s three to five skin cells – you can’t even see it. That’s the DNA.”
In light of yet another cold case being solved by genetic genealogy testing, Myers insists the new technology will likely act as a deterrent for aspiring criminals who may rethink their crimes due to the increased possibility of being caught.
“Investigative genealogy is more comprehensive and, of course, a bigger thing,” Myers told Fox News Digital. “But if [investigators are] on top of their game, you better be afraid, because they’ll get it.”
Latest
CNN anchor calls on Congress to back Trump, officially ‘authorize’ Iran war
CNN’s Michael Smerconish urged Congress to formally authorize President Donald Trump’s ongoing war with Iran during his show Saturday, arguing lawmakers must stop delaying a clear vote as the statutory deadline under the War Powers Resolution approaches.
“The core question is simple: do you believe it’s essential that Iran not acquire a nuclear weapon?” Smerconish said at the top of the segment.
Congress faces an April 28 deadline when the War Powers Resolution requires both chambers to authorize or block the use of force.
Smerconish made his remarks more than 40 days after U.S. military action against Iran began following joint U.S.-Israeli strikes that escalated the conflict.
SENATE DEM ACCUSES TRUMP OF BEING ‘UNFIT FOR OFFICE,’ JOINS GROWING CALL TO IMPEACH, OUST PRESIDENT
“If that answer is yes, and I believe the answer is obviously yes, then authorize the military action necessary to achieve that specific objective,” the CNN host said.
Smerconish argued that a narrowly tailored authorization would clarify both legal authority and political accountability as the conflict continues.
“An authorization scoped to Iran’s nuclear program gives the president the legal authority that he needs, gives Congress the accountability it owes to the American people, and gives Iran no clock to run out,” he said.
He dismissed ongoing procedural maneuvering in Congress, calling on lawmakers, particularly Democrats, to take a definitive stance.
TRUMP’S IRAN THREAT RATTLES GOP AS SOME REPUBLICANS BREAK RANKS AMID 2-WEEK CEASEFIRE
“Stop using the War Powers deadline as cover for indecision,” Smerconish said.
He sharpened that critique by targeting what he described as performative legislative activity. “Democrats, daily procedural votes are not a strategy, they’re a press release,” he said.
Smerconish framed the debate as one that should transcend partisan calculations about Trump himself. “If you believe the war is wrong, then vote to end it,” he said. “If you believe Iran must not go nuclear, then say so and authorize it,” he added.
SCHUMER BLASTS TRUMP’S IRAN WAR AS FAILURE, MOVES TO REIN IN HIS WAR POWERS AMID CEASEFIRE
He warned against filtering national security decisions through political considerations. “Don’t evaluate the decision based on what’s best for Trump. Our only prism is what’s best for America,” Smerconish said.
Under the War Powers Resolution, presidents can deploy U.S. forces without formal congressional authorization for up to 60 days, after which continued military engagement typically requires approval from Congress.
That deadline is placing increased pressure on lawmakers to either authorize or restrict the ongoing operation.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE
U.S. Central Command said U.S. forces had begun a mine-clearance mission in the Strait of Hormuz, with Navy destroyers operating to “set conditions for clearing mines” there in a press release on April 11.
That followed an earlier statement from the White House saying Iran had agreed to a ceasefire and the “reopening the Strait of Hormuz” as the administration pursued a broader peace agreement, underscoring how central the waterway remains to the wider conflict.
Latest
Comer warns ‘something sinister’ may be behind deaths, disappearances of 11 nuclear, space-linked scientists
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., warned Sunday that “something sinister could be happening” after 11 scientists mainly tied to the U.S. nuclear and space research programs reportedly died or went missing under mysterious circumstances, raising urgent national security concerns.
Comer said on “Fox & Friends Weekend” that when he first heard about the disappearances, they sounded like “some kind of crazy conspiracy theory.” But the details of the case changed his mind and prompted him to alert multiple government agencies.
“We’ve put a notice out to the Department of War, to the FBI, to NASA, to the Department of Energy, that we want to know everything that they know about what happened with these scientists, because those four agencies were predominantly the agencies that those 11 individuals were affiliated with. And we want to try to piece this together.”
Comer plans to bring the leaders of these offices before Congress, but said he sent the letters first to allow them time to ensure their testimony would not compromise any potentially classified investigations.
He said he hoped anyone with information would bring it to the Oversight Committee, and that anyone affiliated with America’s nuclear program should be on alert, given the possible security risks to the nation.
“We know there are many countries around the world that would love to have our knowledge and nuclear capabilities. And these are the people that were at the forefront of it, and they’re either dead or missing.”
Missing or deceased figures include experimental propulsion researcher Amy Eskridge, 34; retired Air Force Maj. Gen. William “Neil” McCasland, 68; NASA scientist Monica Jacinto Reza, 60; contractor Steven Garcia, 48; astrophysicist Carl Grillmair, 47; Massachusetts Institute of Technology physicist Nuno Loureiro, 47; NASA engineer Frank Maiwald, 61; Los Alamos–linked employees Melissa Casias, 53, and Anthony Chavez, 79; NASA researcher Michael David Hicks, 59; and pharmaceutical scientist Jason Thomas, 45.
11TH SCIENTIST DEATH EMERGES IN STRING OF MISSING, DEAD OFFICIALS WITH ACCESS TO US SECRETS
In response to the renewed public attention, President Donald Trump has vowed to investigate the mysterious disappearances and deaths of these scientists.
“I hope it’s random, but we’re going to know in the next week and a half,” Trump told reporters Thursday. “I just left a meeting on that subject.”
Additionally, the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) previously told Fox News Digital it is looking into the cases.
“NNSA is aware of reports related to employees of our labs, plants, and sites and is looking into the matter.”
Latest
Woman’s cancer battle takes unbelievable turn when her dog gets same diagnosis
A woman who got a dog to support her through a breast cancer diagnosis was later shocked when the pet was diagnosed with the same disease years later.
Vickie Doogan, 52, from England, said her dog Dolly, a poochon, became her constant companion during recovery from her second cancer diagnosis, news agency SWNS reported.
Doogan was first diagnosed with breast cancer at age 39 after noticing a dull pain and a lump under her arm, which doctors later confirmed was invasive breast cancer that had spread.
COMMON FRUIT FOUND IN AMERICAN KITCHENS MAY SLOW DEADLY FORM OF BREAST CANCER, STUDY SAYS
She underwent chemotherapy, surgery and radiation and was eventually declared cancer-free following an intensive course of treatment.
At 44, she was diagnosed again and underwent another round of treatment before opting for a double mastectomy after learning she carried a BRCA2 gene mutation, which increases the risk of breast cancer.
She got Dolly in 2018 while recovering at home, saying the dog provided comfort and companionship during a difficult period in her life.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
“She’s like my shadow,” Doogan said. “She’s the most perfect little dog.”
In February 2026, Doogan took Dolly to the vet for what she believed was an upset stomach, where a lump was unexpectedly discovered under one of the dog’s nipples.
“The vet said she needed to have a mastectomy. I was so shocked,” Doogan said. “I didn’t even know dogs could have mastectomies.”
CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES
Dolly underwent surgery to remove the cancer, which was determined to be low-grade and did not require additional treatment, allowing her to recover relatively quickly.
“She bounced back just as well as I did,” Doogan said. “People said it’s like she’s mirroring how I dealt with it.”
Both Doogan and her dog are now cancer-free and focusing on moving forward after their shared experiences with the disease, SWNS noted.
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
Doogan said she hopes their story offers encouragement to others facing a diagnosis and shows that recovery is possible.
“When I was first diagnosed, I was absolutely floored,” she said. “Chemo was brutal, but thankfully I responded well.”
“Now I’m living my best life again,” she added. “I want people to know that although breast cancer is scary, you can still live a really full life.”
-
Latest5 days agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News1 week agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News5 days agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
Latest1 week agoMelania Gets Huge Surprise 24 Hours After Making Epstein Announcement
-
News6 days agoFar Left Democrat ‘Squad’ Member LOSES — She’s Out
-
Latest5 days agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News5 days agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
News3 days agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
