Latest
JONATHAN TURLEY: Virginia Democrats’ map scheme faces judgment at the high court
As Virginia heads to the state Supreme Court, Virginia Attorney General Jay Jones (D) will have to up his game a bit. For starters, he will have to actually defend the redistricting resolution as constitutional when prompted. In a recent interview with CNN, even the host of the friendly network expressed frustration that Jones could not seem to get himself to actually defend the dubious language of the ballot measure.
Many of us have expressed skepticism over the process and language of the resolution that passed this week, effectively wiping out all but one GOP district in the purple state.
Virginia was considered the gold standard among states rejecting gerrymandering with fairly divided districts in a state that is divided right down the middle. It then elected Governor Abigail Spanberger, who assured voters that she was adamantly against gerrymandering and then immediately called for the most radical gerrymandered map in the nation after she was elected.
The candidate who declared that “opposing gerrymandering should be a bipartisan priority” rushed a resolution to the voters that would have made Eldridge Gerry himself blush.
ERIC HOLDER ACCUSES GOP OF ‘STEALING SEATS’ WHILE DEFENDING ‘FAIR’ DEMOCRATIC REDISTRICTING PUSH
That map passed by slim margin as Democrats moved to wipe out the representation of half of their neighbors, leaving Republicans with just one of eleven districts.
The problem is that the Democrats were too clever by half in crafting a campaign that even the Washington Post declared as shockingly dishonest and misleading for voters.
The deceit began with the language of the resolution itself. While Virginia law requires clarity in such resolutions, the language was obtuse and vague, declaring that it would “temporarily adopt new congressional districts to restore fairness in the upcoming elections.” There was nothing “temporary” about the plan, which would continue for years. More importantly, it is unclear what is meant by “restore fairness” in a map that would wipe out virtually every GOP district.
In addition, the process used to rush the resolution to the ballot was abridged and unprecedented. This mess was too much for Tazewell Circuit Judge Jack Hurley who enjoined the map approved by voters. It is now awaiting an oral argument before the Virginia Supreme Court next week.
Jones was, of course, aware of all of this when he received the most predictable question from CNN host Brianna Keilar who quoted the misleading elements cited by Judge Hurley and asked “does he have a point that it’s misleading?”
Jones went into an account of how the “yes side prevailed” and called Hurley “an activist judge.” Keilar reasonably followed up, noting “I know that you’re calling him an activist judge, but he is citing the Virginia Constitution and legal experts that we’ve spoken to say what he’s saying is going to create some pretty big challenges for you in court that you will have to overcome.” She then repeated the question.
SOROS-LINKED DARK MONEY NETWORK FUELS VIRGINIA REDISTRICTING PUSH BACKED BY NATIONAL DEMOCRATS
Again, Jones had that deer in the headlights look and went into a babbling spin: “Well, look, I’m really proud of Virginia. I believe the right to vote is sacred, not just as Virginians, but as Americans. This is the birthplace of democracy.”
This exchange went up until, to her great credit, Keilar ended the interview with “I don’t hear you answering the substance of my question.”
The problem is that the campaign and the resolution, as the Washington Post noted, is flagrantly misleading and dishonest. Jones relies on the majority on the Supreme Court to shrug away the problems. Democrats are also hoping that justices who have to face the voters themselves are unlikely to negate a popular vote. Indeed, it does not appear that such a vote has ever been overturned in the state.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION
If the Court stands with the law and throws out the vote, Democrats could face the ultimate disaster. They just spent a fortune to narrowly pass the resolution. In so doing, they alienated half of the state, who took it rather personally that Democrats were trying to wipe out virtually all of their representation in the state after recently promising never to engage in such gerrymandering. They are not likely to forget this effort and virtually every Democrat in the state fought to pass this resolution. Some of these Democrats have to rely on Republican votes in the purple state to secure statewide office. They are unlikely to force this effort into some memory hole for the victims of the gerrymandering, particularly if the courts also declare that they were acting unlawfully.
Finally, the use of unlawful means to gerrymander a state only further destroys the credibility of the Democratic mantra of being defenders of the Constitution and democracy. The optics are only going to be magnified by an attorney general who was elected by Democratic voters after threatening to kill political opponents and their children. There was no vagueness in Jones’ prior approach to political opponents. His election was viewed as the ultimate triumph of political rage by the very same voters who just effectively negated the representation of half of the state.
In the end, it will be up to the Virginia Supreme Court to “to restore fairness in the upcoming elections.” There is no question that this resolution shredded state law and tradition.
The question is whether the justices themselves have the courage to demand more from the Commonwealth of Virginia.
Latest
Trump appeals for unity, rips ’60 Minutes,’ after a history of inflammatory rhetoric on both sides
I don’t want to hear any more about motives.
When someone engages in a mass shooting – or attempts to kill a president – they are by definition crazy.
In the case of the Washington Hilton gunman, his motive is spelled out in his so-called manifesto: He hates President Donald Trump.
Despite a background in engineering and teaching, he somehow became convinced that Trump was in cahoots with Jeffrey Epstein, calling the president a rapist and pedophile.
HOW TRUMP SURVIVES: BATTLING THE MEDIA, FORMER ALLIES AND ASSASSINATION ATTEMPTS
But again, who cares about motive? Anyone who would storm an event protected by the Secret Service – knowing he could easily wind up dead – is not sane.
We do this all the time, try to impose a rational framework on irrational attackers.
The shooter was charged in court yesterday with attempted assassination of the president.
Another thing we do regularly is blame an entire class of people for the actions of a single attacker.
After the Secret Service captured the California gunman – who I’m not naming, under my usual policy of not providing the attention they crave – many conservatives blamed “the left.”
Trump himself accused the Democrats of “dangerous” and “hateful” speech.
MS NOW anchor Antonia Hylton countered that the president should have said more about inflammatory rhetoric.
Just weeks ago, she said, he “posted about the possible extermination of an entire civilization online” and “has called his political foes ‘vermin, lunatics, scum, terrorists, the enemy within.’ He has certainly contributed — at a minimum — to the political rhetoric.”
This ideological finger-pointing is nothing new. One year ago, a gunman posing as a police officer killed Minnesota state Rep. Melissa Hortman, a Democrat and former speaker, and her husband in their home. The killer, a Trump supporter, also wounded a Democratic senator and his wife in their home. Trump said he was “not familiar” with the case.
One year ago, a man with a history of mental illness and a criminal record set fire to the mansion of Pennsylvania’s Democratic governor, Josh Shapiro, on the first night of Passover. He said he would have attacked Shapiro with a sledgehammer if he had encountered him. He had tried to convince his family to vote for Trump and slammed Shapiro for his position on the Palestinians. Trump didn’t contact Shapiro that day but did call the next day.
The gunman who badly wounded Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords, and killed six others in Arizona, was said by many in the press to have been inspired by a Sarah Palin political map that put political opponents in crosshairs. Turns out the killer never saw the map. The New York Times apologized and corrected the false accusation, and a Palin suit against the paper was unsuccessful.
This even goes back to the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which President Clinton blamed on the atmosphere caused by the rhetoric of Rush Limbaugh and other conservative broadcasters.
The security lapses at the Washington Hilton were unforgivable. It’s no accident that President Reagan was shot outside the same hotel in 1981, an attack I covered, in which Reagan lost far more blood than was originally disclosed.
All the gunman had to do to beat the system is take trains to Washington and check in as a guest. As at past White House Correspondent Association dinners, the checking even for tickets was inconsistent. Some journalists and other guests are there only for the pre-parties hosted by news organizations.
As Red Letter reporter Abi Baker explained:
“I didn’t have a dinner ticket, just an invite to a pre-party, so I flashed my phone at security, pulling up the email invitation. There was no barcode to scan, no list to check—just an email for a network news reception that could have been forwarded by anyone. At the party I was invited to, no one asked for ID, only my name. At others, just feet from the ballroom, I walked in without being stopped.”
Incredibly, the Secret Service didn’t even invoke the highest level of security for an event attended by the president, vice president, House speaker and top Cabinet officials. There were other events and receptions going on at the hotel at the same time, so the building couldn’t be secured. There may be other reasons to get rid of the press dinner, but it can never again be held at the Hilton, a sprawling structure that has now been the target of two attempted presidential assassinations.
KIMMEL CALLS MELANIA TRUMP AN ‘EXPECTANT WIDOW’ BEFORE WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS’ DINNER SHOOTING
Melania Trump, meanwhile, ripped Jimmy Kimmel for telling this joke:
During a parody skit about the press dinner, he said: “Our First Lady Melania is here. Look at her, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expected widow.”
Tasteless, to be sure. But this was days before Kimmel or anyone else imagined there would be gunfire at the dinner.
“Kimmel’s hateful and violent rhetoric is intended to divide our country,” the first lady said in a statement. “His monologue about my family isn’t comedy- his words are corrosive and deepens the political sickness within America,” she said in a statement. “People like Kimmel shouldn’t have the opportunity to enter our homes each evening to spread hate…
“A coward, Kimmel hides behind ABC because he knows the network will keep running cover to protect him. Enough is enough. It is time for ABC to take a stand. How many times will ABC’s leadership enable Kimmel’s atrocious behavior at the expense of our community.”
The president added his voice yesterday, saying that in light of his “despicable call to violence,” Kimmel should be “immediately fired by Disney and ABC.” In fairness, Kimmel wasn’t calling for violence, he was doing a comedy sketch, but his words were offensive.
MELANIA TRUMP CALLS FOR ABC TO FIRE JIMMY KIMMEL OVER ‘HATEFUL AND VIOLENT RHETORIC’
In December, as part of their long-running feud, Trump called Kimmel “a dead man walking!” and that CBS should “put him to sleep…it is the humanitarian thing to do!”
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said yesterday that Trump has been the target of “completely deranged” rhetoric since he first ran for president. She blamed a “left-wing culture of hatred.” By falsely accusing him of being a “fascist” and “threat to democracy,” she said, elected Democrats and some in the media have “helped to legitimize this violence and bring us to this dark moment.”
House Speaker Mike Johnson, while calling for a lowering of the temperature, said “you have some of the most prominent figures in the House and in the Senate on the Democrat side effectively calling for war. They use those kinds of metaphors. And it incites violence, because there are crazy people in society, and they get radicalized online.”
During an interview on “60 Minutes,” Norah O’Donnell read from the shooter’s document. Having somehow convinced himself that Trump was part of Jeffrey Epstein’s child abuse network, he wrote: “I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes.”
“I was waiting for you to read that,” Trump said, “because I knew you would – because you’re horrible people…I’m not a rapist. I didn’t rape anybody. Excuse me, I’m not a pedophile. You read that crap from some sick person… You should be ashamed of yourself, reading that – because I’m not any of those things.”
O’Donnell said she was just citing the shooter’s words.
TRUMP CALLS ’60 MINUTES’ HOST ‘DISGRACEFUL’ FOR READING WHCD SUSPECT’S ALLEGED MANIFESTO ON AIR
It’s important to recognize that Trump also has a history of violent rhetoric. He has accused journalists of “treason,” a crime punishable by death.
He has said “if I don’t get elected, it’s going to be a bloodbath,” though he was referring to the auto industry.
During the campaign, he said the Democrats were running a “Gestapo administration.”
In 2020, he reposted a video of a supporter saying, “The only good Democrat is a dead Democrat.”
Two days before the election, he said this about renegade Republican Liz Cheney:
“She’s a radical war hawk. Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK? Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face.”
And, of course, he pardoned and praised the Jan. 6 rioters.
A Utah prosecutor said the man charged last September with killing conservative activist Charlie Kirk, despite coming from a Republican family, had moved toward a leftist ideology, and had become “increasingly concerned about gay and trans rights.” (He had a transgender roommate.)
The shooter, in court last week, asked that the media be barred from covering the trial because it taints the jury pool.
But that brings us back to the useless question of motive. Who cares? There’s no question the recent spate of violence has come from shooters and suspects who at a minimum could be described as anti-Trump.
Some criticized the president for bringing up his planned White House ballroom, because it would be bulletproof and heavily secured. It’s hardly surprising that he would use the occasion to plug his pet project.
But a tragedy was averted that could have been so much worse was thankfully averted.
SUBSCRIBE TO HOWIE’S MEDIA BUZZMETER PODCAST, A RIFF ON THE DAY’S HOTTEST STORIES
FBI Director Kash Patel, who was at the Hilton media dinner, said at a briefing yesterday that Trump had delivered a “message of unity” after the gunfire on Saturday night. We could use more of that, from both sides.
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said “the political violence and rhetoric has got to stop.” He did not exclude “many in this room” for their negative coverage of the president.
Fortunately for all of us, the Secret Service did its job at the last security checkpoint that prevented the irrational gunman from opening fire in the room below.
Latest
LIV Golf Reportedly Postpones New Orleans Tournament After CEO Declared Season Would Continue ‘Full Throttle’
Latest
Jasmine Crockett’s social media posts about WHCD shooting show different tones
Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, posted on social media what appeared to be contradictory messages about the shooting over the weekend at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.
In the shooting that unfolded at the Washington Hilton in Washington, D.C., gunman Cole Tomas Allen of California rushed through a security checkpoint with guns and knives. One Secret Service agent was shot in the chest but was saved by his bulletproof vest.
The Justice Department charged Allen with attempting to assassinate the president, transporting a firearm and ammunition in interstate commerce with intent to commit a felony, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence.
DOJ CITES WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENTS DINNER SHOOTING IN PUSH TO DROP LAWSUIT AGAINST BALLROOM
President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and other administration officials were in attendance, as were members of Congress and the media. Trump and other attendees were rushed off the stage, and the suspect was taken into custody.
Crockett, who lost in the Democratic primary for U.S. Senate this year, has made multiple posts about the shooting since it happened, with some condemning political violence and others questioning whether assassination attempts against Trump were staged.
On her official X and Threads accounts, she said, “The political violence is unacceptable and must stop.”
“I am grateful that everyone attending tonight’s WHCD is safe,” the congresswoman added.
OHIO TEACHER FIRED AFTER VIDEO APPEARING TO LAMENT TRUMP SURVIVING WHCA DINNER SHOOTING
But on her Jasmine For US campaign Threads account, she posted, “Has there ever been a president have this many close ‘attempts’ on their life?”
“Maybe it’s lax gun laws, maybe it’s lack of mental health funding, or maybe it’s fake… who knows,” the post continued.
Fox News Digital has reached out to Crockett’s office for comment. A message was also left with the office of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., seeking comment.
In the immediate aftermath of the shooting, Trump began claiming that the incident showed the need for his proposed White House ballroom. Other administration officials and the president’s allies in Congress quickly began pushing for the ballroom as well.
But the dinner was hosted by the White House Correspondents’ Association and not the White House, and it had more than twice as many guests as the proposed ballroom could hold.
A judge had, on multiple occasions, halted construction of the $400 million White House ballroom, ruling that it lacked congressional approval, while offering an exception for “actions strictly necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House and its grounds.”
-
Latest2 weeks agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News2 weeks agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Latest2 weeks agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News3 weeks agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News2 weeks agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
News2 weeks agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Latest2 weeks agoUT Judge Drops Bombshell In Charlie Kirk Killer Case
-
Latest3 weeks agoMelania Gets Huge Surprise 24 Hours After Making Epstein Announcement
