Connect with us

News

Tucker Carlson Makes Trump Immediately Regret Publicly Attacking Him

Published

on

Tucker Carlson Makes Trump Immediately Regret Publicly Attacking Him

Conservative commentator Tucker Carlson delivered a blistering rebuke of Donald Trump during a Monday night monologue, condemning a controversial Easter Sunday social media post from the president as both offensive and potentially dangerous.

Speaking on his podcast, Carlson expressed disbelief at the tone and timing of Trump’s message, which was posted on Truth Social during one of Christianity’s most sacred holidays. “How dare you speak that way on Easter morning to the country?” Carlson said. “Who do you think you are? You’re tweeting out the f-word on Easter morning.”

The post in question targeted Iran and appeared to threaten military action against key civilian infrastructure, escalating already heightened tensions. “Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!! Open the Fuckin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell – JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah,” the president wrote.

Carlson argued that the message went far beyond typical political rhetoric, raising serious moral and legal concerns. “Trump’s post ‘begins with a promise to use the U.S. military — our military — to destroy civilian infrastructure in another country, which is to say, to commit a war crime, a moral crime, against the people of the country whose welfare, by the way, was one of the reasons we supposedly went into this war in the first place,’” Carlson said.

He went on to frame the issue as part of a broader concern about the direction of U.S. foreign policy. Carlson, who has increasingly positioned himself as a critic of interventionist policies, suggested that rhetoric like Trump’s risks pulling the United States deeper into prolonged conflict—something many voters believed Trump opposed when he campaigned on an “America First” platform.

In addition to policy concerns, Carlson took particular issue with Trump’s reference to religion in the post. “So obviously you’re mocking the religion of Iran,” he said. “OK, if you seek a religious war, that’s a good idea. But by the way, no decent person mocks other people’s religions. You may have a problem with the theology — presumably you do if it’s not your religion — and you can explain what that is. But to mock other people’s faith is to mock the idea of faith itself.”

The backlash underscores a growing divide within Trump’s political base, particularly among conservatives who are increasingly split between foreign policy hawks and those advocating restraint abroad. While Trump returned to power promising to avoid “endless wars,” the ongoing confrontation with Iran—now entering its sixth week—has unsettled some longtime allies who fear a broader escalation in the Middle East.

Carlson’s criticism is especially notable given his past alignment with Trump on many domestic issues. However, in recent weeks, he has become more vocal in questioning the administration’s foreign policy posture, reflecting a broader shift among segments of the conservative movement that are wary of deeper military involvement overseas.

He was not alone in voicing concern. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, once one of Trump’s most outspoken defenders in Congress, also issued a sharp rebuke following the Easter post.

“Everyone in his administration that claims to be a Christian needs to fall on their knees and beg forgiveness from God and stop worshipping the President and intervene in Trump’s madness,” Greene said Sunday.

“This is not making America great again, this is evil,” she added.

Taken together, the reactions from Carlson and Greene point to a notable moment of internal friction within the broader conservative coalition. As tensions with Iran continue and rhetoric intensifies, debates over morality, strategy, and America’s role on the global stage are increasingly playing out not just between political parties—but within them.

Continue Reading

News

All Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question

Published

on

All Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question

During a Thursday appearance on Fox News Channel’s Jesse Watters Primetime, Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) delivered a blunt critique of how the American media portrays Iran, accusing major outlets of downplaying the regime’s behavior and, in his view, effectively “carrying water” for the country.

The conversation unfolded as host Jesse Watters pressed Fetterman on a broader political question, asking whether some Democrats believe former President Donald Trump poses a greater threat than Iran. The question highlighted an ongoing divide in American political discourse over national security priorities and foreign policy framing.

Fetterman declined to speculate on the views of his fellow Democrats, but he did not hold back in criticizing the media. He argued that coverage of Iran often lacks necessary context about the regime’s long-standing actions and policies. According to Fetterman, this omission creates a skewed narrative that fails to fully inform the public about the nature of the Iranian government.

He emphasized that discussions surrounding Iran frequently overlook its historical conduct, including its role in regional instability and adversarial stance toward the United States. “They’re describing the kinds of circumstances,” Fetterman said, suggesting that media reports sometimes focus narrowly on current events without acknowledging the broader pattern of behavior that defines Iran’s actions on the global stage.

Fetterman also stressed what he sees as a moral clarity issue. He argued that the United States should not hesitate to characterize Iran’s actions directly and honestly. In his view, America continues to represent a “force of good in the world,” and maintaining that role requires holding adversarial regimes accountable without equivocation.

The senator’s remarks reflect a growing frustration among some policymakers who believe media narratives can influence public perception in ways that complicate foreign policy discussions. By calling for more direct language and fuller context, Fetterman signaled that, regardless of party differences, he believes accurately framing Iran’s behavior is critical to maintaining a strong and consistent U.S. position on the world stage.

Continue Reading

Latest

Melania Gets Huge Surprise 24 Hours After Making Epstein Announcement

Published

on

Melania Gets Huge Surprise 24 Hours After Making Epstein Announcement

Reactions poured in Thursday after First Lady Melania Trump issued a rare on-camera statement forcefully rejecting allegations linking her to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaking earlier in the day, Melania Trump made clear that she had no personal relationship with Epstein or his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, and emphasized that neither individual played any role in her introduction to Donald Trump.

“The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today,” she said. “The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but rather, I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation.”

The first lady also underscored that her name has never appeared in court documents tied to Epstein, framing the allegations as entirely baseless and damaging to her reputation. Her remarks quickly drew responses from political figures across the spectrum, many taking to social media to weigh in.

Rep. Nancy Mace, a Republican who has been outspoken about releasing documents related to Epstein, publicly backed the first lady. Posting online, Mace expressed support for Melania Trump’s stance and highlighted her advocacy efforts.

“Melania Trump stands with Epstein victims.”

She also praised the first lady’s work on legislation aimed at protecting women from exploitation and abuse.

“Thank you to our First Lady for being a voice for victims across the country. From her work on the Take It Down Act to publicly standing for the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and calling for action and the truth,” she said.

“The truth will prevail. America is strong when strong women stand up for what is right.”

Rep. Thomas Massie also weighed in, pointing to ongoing efforts in Congress to bring greater transparency to the Epstein case. Massie referenced his work on legislation related to the release of Epstein-related documents and addressed the broader issue of accountability.

“First Lady asks Congress to bring Epstein survivors in for testimony. With all due respect, that’s @DAGToddBlanche’s job!,” he said.

“@RepRoKhanna & I already gave brave survivors a chance to tell their horrific stories on Capitol Hill. @PamBondi wouldn’t even acknowledge them. PROSECUTE!”

Former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene also aligned herself with Melania Trump’s remarks, voicing support for both the first lady and the victims involved in the case.

“I am grateful to the First Lady for her brave statement today about Epstein and his victims,” she said. “I agree with her that the victims should be heard. I also agree with Thomas Massie. The DOJ needs to PROSECUTE!!! And the role of Congress is to legislate, not prosecute.”

Democrats also responded following the first lady’s statement. Rep. Robert Garcia called for immediate congressional action, urging House leadership to hold a public hearing focused on survivors.

“We agree with First Lady Melania Trump’s call for a public hearing with the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein. We encourage Chairman Comer to respond to the First Lady’s request and schedule a public hearing immediately,” he said.

Garcia also described the moment as significant in bringing renewed attention to the broader investigation.

“The First Lady said two things,” Garcia said. “1) She pushed back on Acting AG Todd Blanche & her husband’s efforts to kill this investigation. 2) She joined our efforts to call for a public hearing where survivors who choose to do so have an opportunity to testify.”

Melania Trump’s forceful denial and the swift bipartisan reaction highlight the continued sensitivity surrounding the Epstein case, as well as the political pressure to address unanswered questions and ensure accountability moving forward.

Continue Reading

Latest

Warning Issued Over Big Boom In Unexpected Result From Ozempic Use

Published

on

Warning Issued Over Big Boom In Unexpected Result From Ozempic Use

The exploding popularity of GLP-1 receptor agonists like Ozempic and Wegovy is often hailed as a public health triumph, but one potential side effect may be flying under the radar.

The risk of divorce increases as weight drops, according to historical data from bariatric surgery patients.

Some experts believe that the same pattern could occur as more people “take the jab” and decide to call it quits on their marriages.

STUDY REVEALS HOW RAPIDLY WEIGHT COMES BACK AFTER QUITTING OBESITY MEDICATIONS

Per-Arne Svensson, a professor at the Institute of Health and Care Sciences in Sweden, studies the link between weight loss and relationship status. While these drugs have many metabolic benefits, he warns that the social fallout is very real.

“The effect likely unfolds in several stages,” Svensson told Fox News Digital. “First, a substantial amount of weight must be lost, which typically occurs within the first year. Subsequently, changes in relationship dynamics may begin to emerge, followed by the legal processes associated with divorce.”

This observation aligns with previous studies that found patients who underwent bariatric surgery were twice as likely to get a divorce compared to the general population.

STOPPING GLP-1 DRUGS LIKE OZEMPIC ERODES HEART HEALTH BENEFITS QUICKLY, NEW STUDY FINDS

In addition to helping with diabetes control and weight management, GLP-1s have also been found to help break unhealthy, reward-seeking habits like drinking and smoking.

However, Svensson said the cause of these splits isn’t necessarily a change in a patient’s temperament or brain chemistry. Instead, he points to the psychological and social shifts that accompany a new physique.

“Weight loss itself may increase a sense of autonomy or confidence, potentially empowering individuals to leave unhealthy relationships,” he told Fox News Digital.

Many patients report that their lifestyles change substantially after weight loss, “often involving greater social engagement and increased attention from others,” the doctor added.

GREATER WEIGHT LOSS PROMISED BY HIGHER-DOSE WEGOVY SHOT, NOW APPROVED BY FDA

If a partner is unable to adapt to this more outgoing version of their spouse, the friction can cause rifts.

A 2013 study supports this “relationship tension” theory, finding that when one partner loses significant weight while the other remains the same, it can lead to feelings of insecurity and criticism from the partner who didn’t change.

“Currently, surgery leads to greater average weight loss, and its impact on relationships is therefore likely to be more pronounced,” Svensson said.

“However, as newer, more effective medications are developed, we may soon see comparable levels of weight loss to those achieved with surgery.”

Svensson noted that weight loss doesn’t have to mean “date loss.”

“Among individuals who are single, the likelihood of forming a new relationship also increases substantially after weight loss,” he said.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“While it may be somewhat discouraging to acknowledge the role of appearance in partner selection, finding a new romantic partner is nevertheless one of the most significant events in a person’s life.”

To mitigate the risk of a split, Svensson suggests that couples take a collaborative approach to health.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

If one partner is pursuing wellness goals, involving the spouse in healthy lifestyle changes — such as diet and exercise — can create a shared journey rather than one that pulls the couple apart, according to the expert.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

“There may be clear advantages to partners undertaking weight-loss treatment together,” provided that both have a clinical need, Svensson added.

Fox News Digital reached out to GLP-1 manufacturers requesting comment.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal