Connect with us

Economy

Dem Tries To Reinstate Dreaded TSA Policy With A Nasty Twist

Published

on

Dem Tries To Reinstate Dreaded TSA Policy With A Nasty Twist

Reaction spread rapidly Wednesday after a report from The Free Press alleged that the Trump administration attempted to pressure the Vatican into backing its position in the escalating conflict with Iran.

According to the report, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby met with Cardinal Christophe Pierre, the Vatican’s ambassador to the United States representing Vatican leadership under Pope Leo. The administration was reportedly frustrated with remarks made earlier in the year during a State of the World address, in which the Pope urged nations to respect international borders—comments some interpreted as a subtle critique of U.S. policy.

The report claimed Colby warned Cardinal Pierre that the United States possessed overwhelming military power and suggested the Catholic Church should align itself accordingly. It also alleged that the conversation intensified, with a U.S. official referencing the historical Avignon Papacy—a period when popes were heavily influenced by the French crown.

While the Vatican Embassy confirmed that a meeting took place, it declined to comment on the substance or tone of the discussion. The Pentagon, however, pushed back strongly on the report, calling the account “highly exaggerated and distorted.” Vice President JD Vance, a Catholic convert, said he had not reviewed the report but noted he had previously met Cardinal Pierre and expressed interest in discussing the matter further.

As the story circulated, several Catholic media figures raised questions about its accuracy. JD Flynn, editor of The Pillar, said his team had been unable to independently verify key elements of the account.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

“That shouldn’t lead anyone to a conclusion of any kind,” Flynn wrote. “Except that your pals down at the pillar haven’t confirmed this report.”

Further doubt was cast by Brian Burch, the U.S. ambassador to the Holy See, who said he spoke directly with Cardinal Pierre about the meeting.

“As expected, he confirmed that recent media characterizations of his meeting with Undersecretary Colby are ‘fabrications’ that were ‘just invented,’” Burch wrote. “Given the intelligence and seriousness of Mr. Colby, I was likewise not surprised when His Eminence acknowledged there were no threats of any kind in the meeting.”

Burch added that Cardinal Pierre described the discussion as “frank and cordial” and said there was no reference to the Avignon Papacy.

Jonathan Liedl, managing editor of the National Catholic Register, also pointed to potential weaknesses in the reporting, particularly regarding sourcing.

“None of the sources upon which the story is based were apparently even at the meeting. They were ‘briefed’ on it. So we get little floating nuggets like ‘the Avignon papacy was invoked!’ without needed context,” he wrote in a thread on X.

“To confirm dramatic characterizations of the meeting and some alleged reference to Avignon, you certainly should [speak to someone who was there]. If you don’t, it runs the risk of looking like gossip,” he added.

Separately, First Lady Melania Trump brought renewed attention to the long-running controversy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein by issuing a rare public statement denying any connection to him or his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell.

“The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility, and respect,” Melania said. “I do not object to their ignorance, but rather, I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation. I’ve never been friends with Epstein. Donald and I were invited to the same parties as Epstein from time to time, since overlapping in social circles is common in New York City and Palm Beach. To be clear, I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice, [Ghislaine] Maxwell.”

She also denied that Epstein introduced her to President Donald Trump, saying the two met by chance at a party.

The statement reportedly caught some off guard. According to journalist Jacqueline Alemany, the president himself indicated he had not been briefed in advance.

“Just got off a quick call w President Trump who said he didnt ‘know anything about’ FLOTUS’ statement prior to her on camera appearance, but that he was in a meeting about the war & couldn’t speak further. ‘She didn’t know him,’ he added before hanging up, referring to Epstein,” Alemany wrote.

In a separate development, Sen. Tammy Duckworth criticized a recent Department of Homeland Security policy decision regarding airport security procedures. Duckworth raised concerns after reports suggested that screening technology may not fully detect threats concealed in footwear, calling the rollback of the long-standing shoe removal requirement a serious risk.

“Allowing a potentially catastrophic security deficiency to remain in place for seven months and counting betrays TSA’s mission,” she said. “At a minimum, TSA’s failure to swiftly implement corrective action warrants the immediate withdrawal of Secretary Noem’s reckless and dangerous policy that increases the risk of a terrorist smuggling a dangerous item onto a flight.”

The policy in question traces back to 2006, following a failed bombing attempt involving explosives hidden in a passenger’s shoes.

Continue Reading

Economy

FINALLY! Americans Get Some MUCH Needed Good News

Published

on

DHS About To Test Unprecedented New Weapon At Border – Leftists Irate!

Oil prices took a sharp turn Monday, tumbling to their lowest levels in 11 days as traders reacted to signs of possible diplomatic movement between the United States and Iran — while Saudi Arabia finds new ways to keep massive amounts of crude flowing despite mounting turmoil across the Middle East.

Brent crude for November plunged $2.69, or 2.6%, to $101.18 a barrel by 12:54 p.m. GMT after briefly touching its lowest level since September 10.

U.S. crude fell even harder.

West Texas Intermediate’s October contract, which expires Tuesday, dropped $2.69, or 2.7%, to $97.61 a barrel. The November WTI contract stood at $93.49.

The sudden retreat came despite continued fighting across the Middle East and another exchange of threats between Washington and Tehran over the weekend.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

But markets received a potentially significant signal Sunday.

President Donald Trump said he would be open to meeting Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, who is expected to travel to New York for this week’s United Nations General Assembly.

Iran has also reportedly conveyed conditions to mediators for potentially reopening negotiations, according to a report citing Iranian security chief Mohsen Rezaei.

Those signals raised the possibility of renewed talks between Washington and Tehran, reducing some of the immediate fears that further escalation could threaten global energy supplies.

But on the ground, the situation remains volatile.

Iran-backed Houthi forces in Yemen said they attacked Riyadh and a Saudi Aramco facility in the Red Sea city of Yanbu while continuing efforts to expand their control in Yemen.

China has also pressed Iran to help restrain the Houthis following an appeal from Saudi Arabia, according to sources familiar with the discussions.

Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia is making major adjustments to keep its oil moving.

Attacks disrupted the kingdom’s East-West pipeline and complicated shipments through Yanbu, but Saudi Aramco has responded by increasing exports through the Strait of Hormuz this month and next.

That shift appears to be having a significant impact on global supply concerns.

“Middle East oil flows remain surprisingly strong despite the disruption to Saudi Arabia’s East-West pipeline,” JPMorgan analysts said in a September 18 note.

The numbers behind the shift are dramatic.

“The most notable pivot has come from Saudi Arabia,” the analysts said, as satellite data indicated Saudi oil moving through the Strait of Hormuz averaged 2.9 million barrels per day over the previous six days.

In August, that figure had been just 700,000 barrels per day.

That massive increase has helped ease immediate fears that the escalating conflict could trigger a much more serious supply crunch.

Oil producers are also increasingly turning to ship-to-ship transfers near Oman to keep crude moving through the region.

Those workarounds have helped prevent a more severe disruption in global supplies, but they aren’t coming cheaply.

Shipping costs have surged as tankers navigate increasingly complicated and potentially dangerous routes.

There are supply concerns elsewhere as well.

Libya’s National Oil Corporation said production at the country’s Sharara oilfield had been partially reduced, although officials did not provide a reason for the reduction.

Monday’s selloff leaves Brent hovering just above the closely watched $100-per-barrel threshold after prices surged above $108 last week.

That puts global oil markets at a critical point.

On one side, continued fighting, attacks on energy infrastructure and disrupted shipping routes are keeping geopolitical risk elevated.

On the other, Saudi Arabia’s ability to reroute enormous quantities of crude — combined with the possibility of renewed diplomacy between Washington and Tehran — is easing fears of an immediate supply shock.

Now traders are turning their attention to New York.

This week’s United Nations meetings could provide the next major signal about whether Washington and Tehran are moving toward negotiations or whether tensions will escalate again.

At the same time, Saudi Arabia is racing to keep crude flowing through one of the world’s most strategically important — and increasingly volatile — energy corridors.

With Brent sitting barely above $100, either development could quickly send oil markets moving again.

Continue Reading

Economy

Warren Buffett Makes Shocking Announcement

Published

on

Warren Buffett Makes Shocking Announcement

An extraordinary era in American business is coming to an end.

Warren Buffett is officially stepping away from the chairman’s seat at Berkshire Hathaway, closing another chapter in a remarkable run that stretched for more than half a century and turned the legendary investor into one of the most influential figures in modern business.

Berkshire announced Friday that Buffett, 96, will become chairman emeritus effective immediately. He isn’t cutting ties with the company entirely, however, and will remain on Berkshire’s board of directors.

Taking his place as chairman will be his son, Howard Buffett.

Howard has served as a Berkshire director since 1993 and has spent decades leading the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. His elevation to chairman represents another major piece of a succession plan Berkshire has been preparing for years.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

For Warren Buffett, the announcement marks the latest — and one of the most significant — steps away from the company he spent decades building into a corporate powerhouse.

Buffett had served as Berkshire Hathaway’s chairman since 1970.

During that time, he oversaw an extraordinary transformation, taking what had once been a struggling textile business and building it into a massive conglomerate with operations spanning insurance, railroads, energy, manufacturing, retail and services.

His influence over the company’s day-to-day operations had already begun to diminish.

Buffett stepped down as Berkshire’s chief executive late last year, turning control of the company over to longtime lieutenant Greg Abel.

Now the chairman’s title is changing hands as well.

Friday’s announcement means Berkshire is entering a new era in which Abel runs the company’s operations while Howard Buffett oversees the board.

Warren Buffett, however, isn’t disappearing.

As chairman emeritus, he will remain a director and continue providing his judgment and perspective to the company’s leadership — preserving a connection between Berkshire’s future and the man who shaped its identity for generations.

Following the announcement, Abel paid tribute to the enormous impact Buffett has had on the company.

“Warren’s impact on Berkshire and its owners is without parallel in the history of American business,” Abel said in a statement. “The culture Warren built and the values he championed will remain at the heart of Berkshire, and Howard will be their guardian.”

That culture became almost as famous as Buffett himself.

Rather than chasing every new market trend, Buffett built his reputation around patience, long-term investing, disciplined acquisitions and a straightforward approach to evaluating businesses.

Under his leadership, Berkshire accumulated an enormous portfolio of operating companies while also becoming famous for taking major stock positions in some of America’s most recognizable corporations.

Along the way, Buffett became more than a corporate executive.

His annual shareholder letters, public appearances and Berkshire shareholder meetings turned the Omaha investor into one of the world’s most closely followed voices on investing, business and the American economy.

But the transition away from Buffett has been unfolding for some time.

Last year, Buffett announced that Abel would become Berkshire’s top executive. He later signaled that his own public presence would shrink, including fewer appearances at Berkshire’s annual meeting and an end to writing the company’s annual shareholder letter.

Howard Buffett’s move into the chairman’s position wasn’t unexpected either.

The younger Buffett had long been identified as an important part of Berkshire’s eventual succession structure, with his father previously describing the chairman’s role as a safeguard for the company’s distinctive culture and values once he was no longer overseeing daily operations.

That succession plan is now becoming reality.

Greg Abel is running Berkshire as CEO.

Howard Buffett is taking control of the board as chairman.

And Warren Buffett — after more than five decades at the center of one of the most remarkable corporate transformations in American history — is moving into an advisory role as chairman emeritus.

The legendary investor may still have a seat at the table.

But the company he built is officially moving into its post-Buffett leadership era.

Continue Reading

Economy

Pete Hegseth Just Confirmed Devastating Rumors

Published

on

Pete Hegseth Just Confirmed Devastating Rumors

A tragic accident at Edwards Air Force Base claimed the lives of eight Americans Monday when a U.S. Air Force B-52 Stratofortress bomber crashed shortly after takeoff during a routine test mission, according to military officials.

The aircraft went down at approximately 11:20 a.m. PDT while conducting a local test sortie connected to a radar modernization program. Witnesses reported seeing the bomber erupt in flames before a massive plume of black smoke rose into the sky above the Mojave Desert.

Emergency response teams rushed to the scene, but officials quickly determined that there were no survivors.

Speaking at a press conference, Col. James Hayes, deputy commander of the 412th Test Wing, confirmed the devastating loss.

“Today, Edwards Air Force Base experienced a horrible tragedy, and we lost eight great Americans,” Hayes said.

📣

FROM THE EDITORS  -  Keeping our readers safe extends beyond the headlines. We've secured an exclusive antivirus offer from TotalAV to help protect your devices and personal information.

“This crash is deemed to be unsurvivable, and right now, our thoughts and prayers are with the families of those who lost their loved ones,” Hayes added.

Hayes also provided additional details regarding the mission.

“It was a B-52 that was on initial takeoff supporting the radar modernization program, which is a test; it was a local test sortie,” he explained.

According to officials, the crew included military personnel, civilian government employees, and contractors working on the modernization effort. Two Boeing employees were reportedly among those aboard the aircraft.

The loss sent shockwaves through the military community and prompted an outpouring of condolences from government leaders and defense officials across the country.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded on social media shortly after news of the crash became public.

“May GOD shepherd the souls of these incredible Americans — and watch over their families,” Hegseth wrote.

“Our thoughts and prayers are with the families and unit members at this time. More information will be released as it becomes available,” Hegseth added.

Air Force Secretary Troy Meink also expressed his sorrow over the tragedy.

“We mourn this loss and honor the service of our Airmen, civilians, and contractors who work every day to advance our mission,” Meink said. “My thoughts are with the bomber and test communities during this difficult time.”

The B-52 Stratofortress remains one of the most recognizable aircraft in American military history. First entering service in the 1950s, the bomber has served through multiple conflicts and remains a key component of America’s strategic deterrent capabilities. Despite its age, the aircraft continues to undergo modernization efforts intended to keep it operational for decades to come.

House Speaker Mike Johnson noted the aircraft’s significance to many military communities across the nation.

“The roar of a B-52 is a familiar sound to all of us in Bossier City, Shreveport, and the surrounding region, and reminds us daily of the courage and sacrifice of those in uniform,” Johnson posted.

“As more details emerge, we mourn alongside our military community and pray for the families, friends, and fellow service members grieving this devastating loss,” Johnson added.

The crash also caused damage to portions of the runway at Edwards Air Force Base, forcing officials to temporarily suspend flight operations while investigators and recovery crews secured the area.

Military officials have launched a formal accident investigation. While no cause has yet been identified, aviation experts note that test flights often involve unique operational conditions and that investigators will carefully examine aircraft systems, maintenance records, flight data, weather conditions, and crew communications.

Officials cautioned that a full investigation could take several months before definitive conclusions are reached.

California Gov. Gavin Newsom also extended condolences to the families of those lost while thanking first responders who responded to the scene.

Boeing confirmed that two of its employees were aboard the aircraft and said the company is fully cooperating with investigators.

“It is with great sadness that we confirm two Boeing employees were among those on board. We are in contact with their families and are offering support,” Boeing said.

Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina joined other leaders in honoring the victims.

“Susan and I are heartbroken by the tragic loss of eight lives in the B-52 crash at Edwards Air Force Base. Our hearts are with the families and loved ones of those lost, as well as the entire Edwards Air Force Base community. We honor their service to our nation and mourn their loss.”

As investigators work to determine what caused the accident, the nation is mourning the loss of eight Americans who were serving their country in support of a mission aimed at maintaining the technological edge of the U.S. military. Their sacrifice now becomes part of the long and storied history of Edwards Air Force Base, a location that has played a central role in some of America’s most important aviation achievements.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal