Connect with us

Latest

President Trump’s negotiating team praised by nuclear experts for walking away from Pakistan talks

Published

on

With a second round of talks likely to place between the U.S. and Iran’s regime this week over its illicit nuclear weapons programs, leading experts on Tehran’s program say the Trump administration was right to walk away.

After nearly a day of talks, Vice President JD Vance’s team pulled the plug on the negotiations taking place in Pakistan, something welcomed by experts in the field.

 “The U.S. team was wise to walk away once it became clear the Iranians would not agree to Washington’s core nuclear demands. Tehran maintaining enriched uranium stocks and uranium enrichment capabilities provides it with a pathway to nuclear weapons, plain and simple,” Andrea Stricker, deputy director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies’ nonproliferation program, told Fox News Digital.

A core dispute between the U.S. and Iran is over Tehran’s desire to enrich uranium — the material used to build nuclear weapons.

WITKOFF WARNS IRAN IS ‘A WEEK AWAY’ FROM ‘BOMB-MAKING MATERIAL’ AS TRUMP WEIGHS ACTION

In 2018, President Trump withdrew from President Obama’s nuclear weapons deal with Iran because his administration argued that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the formal name of the deal, permitted Iran to build an atomic bomb.

When asked what a good nuclear agreement would look like, Stricker said, “A good deal requires the regime to not only turn over its nuclear fuel, dismantle key facilities, and commit to a permanent ban on enrichment, but to cooperate with an IAEA investigation that fully and completely accounts for and dismantles Iran’s nuclear weapons-relevant facilities, equipment, documentation, centrifuges and related production capabilities.”

Stricker acknowledged that the process could take several years, but noted that “the IAEA is well-equipped for this mission and has experience dismantling nuclear weapons programs in Iraq, Libya and South Africa. Anything less and Iran will likely cheat on its commitments and reconstitute a breakout pathway.”

TRUMP REVEALS IRAN MADE ‘SIGNIFICANT PROPOSAL’ AFTER ULTIMATUM, BUT ‘NOT GOOD ENOUGH’

Sen. Lindsey Graham said Monday he opposes a reported proposal by the U.S. for a 20-year ban on Iran’s uranium enrichment under a potential deal.

“I appreciate President Donald Trump’s resolve to end the Iranian conflict peacefully and through diplomacy. However, we have to remember who we’re dealing with in Iran: terrorists, liars, and cheaters,” Graham posted on X.

“If this reporting is accurate, the idea that we would agree to a moratorium on enrichment rather than a ban on enrichment would be a mistake in my view,” he said.

“Would we agree to a moratorium for al-Qaeda to enrich? No.”

A regional official from the Mideast confirmed to Fox News Digital that a 20-year moratorium on enriched uranium was made by the U.S. and rejected by the Islamic Republic.

David Albright, a physicist who is the founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington, D.C., praised the U.S. decision to end the talks in Pakistan. Writing on X account, which is closely followed by Iran watchers, he stated: “The U.S. was Right to Walk Away in Islamabad.”

Albright told Fox News Digital the move by the U.S. negotiators “makes it clear that this is not negotiating for negotiating’s sake. And leaving threw Iran on the defensive, signaling it as the losing state in the war. Moreover, the Iranians would not have shifted their positions in any significant way. They usually have no flexibility. But Iran wanted to have negotiations continue in order to try to tie the hands of the U.S. and Israel, while trying to portray themselves as victors. Now, Iran has to decide whether to accept the U.S. offer or risk war resuming.”

He added that a good nuclear deal for the U.S. would mean “no enrichment and no stocks of HEU [Highly Enriched Uranium] and LEU [Low Enriched Uranium]; Iran cooperating with the inspectors and verifiably ending its nuclear weapons program and providing a complete nuclear declaration, something it has never done.”

Albright continued that “If Iran signals willingness to accept the U.S. position, meeting again makes sense. 

“Iran has absolutely no need to enrich. Its only civil need is for a small amount of 20% percent enriched for its small research reactor, the Tehran Research Reactor, and it has enough 20% enriched uranium in fuel or nearly made into fuel stored in Iran and in Russia under JCPOA [Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action] arrangements for 20 years.”

He concluded, “To be flip, and paraphrase Abbie Hoffman, I have the right to yell theater in a crowded fire, but I don’t. Iran’s emphasis on its right to enrich is as irrelevant and beside the point.”

Continue Reading

Latest

Curt Cignetti was so focused this offseason, he turned down all external requests: ‘I’m 95% football’

Published

on

The Indiana Hoosiers, out of nowhere, won the National Championship, finishing off an undefeated 2025-2026 season.

It’s not an understatement to say that it was one of the most surprising outcomes in modern college football history. A program that had little track record of success, more commonly viewed as one of the easy wins on a team’s schedule than a legitimate contender for major postseason accomplishments. It was a remarkable achievement. 

In fact, just before the regular season started, Texas Longhorns head coach Steve Sarkisian said he thought undefeated teams were a thing of the past. Then Indiana goes 16-0. 

TEXAS HEAD COACH STEVE SARKISIAN THINKS DOMINANT CFB TEAMS ARE A THING OF THE PAST

You’d think after a season like that, the Hoosiers program, and especially head coach Curt Cignetti, would take some time to enjoy it. Bask in the glow, take some time off, do a sort of “victory lap” through the media, talking about what it meant. 

Well, Indiana and Cignetti did the opposite. The exact opposite. Because he’s a football guy first, and football guys think about one thing: more football.

ESPN spoke to Cignetti on the Indiana campus, where he detailed how he approaches coaching and development.

“We’ve got a way of doing things,” he said. “How you do something is how you do everything. Consistency, performance is the key to the drill. So right now we’re teaching guys not only scheme, but standards, expectations, and how we want to play the game between the white lines, and I see us making progress.”

But perhaps the clearest indicator of how committed Cignetti is to keeping the focus on football came when ESPN reported that he told Indiana athletic director Scott Dolson and university president Pamela Whitten to “turn down all external requests and speaking engagements.” Why? So he could “continue to focus on football.”

“I’m 95% football,” Cignetti said. “We’ve said no to everything except for the Indy 500.”

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

“I’ve got to be able to do my job,” he said. “These things pull you out of the office, and they take up your time. I mean, I have a job to do. Believe it or not, I’m busy.”

That’s a football guy if we’ve ever seen one.

Obviously, all coaches are focused on their jobs. It’s an extremely demanding profession that requires dedication and extraordinary amounts of time for recruiting, game planning, and personnel evaluation. But it’s clear that Cignetti’s focus, potentially as a result of his time coaching with Nick Saban, has completely changed the Indiana program. Along with nailing the transfer portal, of course. 

Players can see that single-minded purpose and respond to it, and the Hoosiers played with the discipline and efficiency of a team that mirrors its coach. Even though Cignetti has to replace Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza and other key players, it’s hard to bet against Indiana being right back in contention. Because Cignetti is all football.

Continue Reading

Latest

Man who pleaded guilty to raping 12-year-old relative is illegal immigrant from Honduras, DHS says

Published

on

A Louisiana man who pleaded guilty to raping and impregnating his 12-year-old relative is an illegal immigrant from Honduras, federal officials confirmed to Fox News.

Jose Lopez-Montoya, 41, described by local media as a “Lake Charles man,” faces up to 99 years in prison after repeatedly abusing the minor.

The Department of Homeland Security told Fox News that Lopez-Montoya is a Honduran national who illegally entered the U.S. in 2011 under the Obama administration.

ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT ARRESTED FOR KIDNAPPING, ATTACKING TEEN NEAR TRUMP’S BACKYARD: POLICE

“Once again, the media is running cover for a criminal illegal alien. This sicko pled guilty to incest. He raped and impregnated his 12 year-old relative. ICE is working with our Louisiana partners to ensure this monster is never loose in American communities again,” the agency added.

 “This ‘Lake Charles Man’ is actually an illegal alien from Honduras who admitted to illegally entering the U.S. in 2011,” DHS added.

MEXICAN NATIONAL CONVICTED OF ILLEGALLY VOTING IN US AFTER FALSE CITIZENSHIP CLAIMS FACES REMOVAL: DHS

The victim later gave birth in July 2024, and Lopez-Montoya admitted the child was his, according to KPLC.

Authorities said the abuse occurred over a two-year period while Lopez-Montoya served as the girl’s guardian.

Lopez-Montoya was arrested on two counts of first-degree rape and is also subject to an immigration detainer.

He pleaded guilty this week to aggravated crimes against nature by incest and faces 25 to 99 years in prison, according to KPLC. His sentencing is scheduled for April 28.

Continue Reading

Latest

Carville and co-host lament that Trump sparked a redistricting war, making both parties look cynical

Published

on

Veteran Democratic strategist James Carville and his podcast co-host Al Hunt analyzed the results of the Virginia redistricting vote, agreeing that President Donald Trump started a redistricting war.

Democrats scored a major victory Tuesday when Virginia voters narrowly passed a congressional redistricting referendum that could give the party a significant boost in the battle for the U.S. House of Representatives majority in the 2026 midterm elections, the Associated Press reported.

The ballot measure gives the Democrat-controlled Virginia legislature — rather than the state’s current nonpartisan commission — temporary redistricting power through the 2030 election. It could result in a 10–1 advantage for Democrats in Virginia’s congressional delegation, up from their current 6–5 edge.

Hunt lamented on “Politics War Room” that the redistricting vote was a terrible thing, even if he personally would have supported it as a politically pragmatic necessity.

TRUMP HAILS TEXAS REDISTRICTING APPROVAL THAT COULD ADD FIVE GOP CONGRESSIONAL SEATS NATIONWIDE

“That is an awful outcome. Virginia is a blue state, but it’s not a 90% blue state,” he said. “Democrats, however, had no choice. This was all due to Donald Trump, who, desperate to avoid losing the House last year, demanded Republicans gerrymander in Texas and elsewhere and they were going to try to fix the elections. What he didn’t figure was that Democrats would respond just as ruthlessly, California and Virginia in particular.”

“I think the outcome in Virginia is terrible,” Hunt stressed. “I would have voted for it, even though I think it’s terrible. They did it by referendum. The voters decided rather than backroom deals like they did in Texas and in Missouri and elsewhere.”

He went on to argue that while this may be something to understandable for Republicans to take issue with, he advised, “Tell them to look next door at North Carolina, a purple, slightly red state [that] gerrymandered their congressional districts for what’s expected to be a 11-3 advantage.”

SPANBERGER FACES ‘BAIT-AND-SWITCH’ BACKLASH IN FINAL HOURS BEFORE REDISTRICTING REFERENDUM

“I’ll tell ya, 11–3 in North Carolina is every bit as bad as 10–1 in Virginia,” he said. “Trump, who only cares about himself, started this whole damn fiasco, and in the end, I think it may help Democrats more than it helps him.”

“Well, you got to blame the Supreme Court, too,” Carville said. “I mean, I hate to bring the bearer of bad news, but the great American institution called the Supreme Court said, ‘Well OK, there’s no equal protection. There’s no anything. The legislature can do what they want.’”

“The court has become so disreputable, so unpopular, and look at the polls. I’m not the only person that believes that it has to be saved from itself. That’s how bad it’s become,” Carville said. “But that they’re the people that let this stuff go with all this cockamamie 11-to-3 that, you know, I mean, as if the voters aren’t required to have equal protection during redistricting.”

DARK MONEY FLOODS VIRGINIA AHEAD OF REDISTRICTING VOTE THAT COULD HAND DEMOCRATS HOUSE EDGE

“I have no idea how you come up with that theory that that legal theory could work, but they say it does,” Carville said. “They’re corrupt. No code of ethics, no rules of conduct, no nothing.”

Hunt went on to suggest that politics now feels like a standoff where both sides are afraid to “unilaterally disarm” and instead opt for cynical power plays like gerrymandering.

“The problem with this is when you let politicians choose their voters rather than voters choose their politicians, you create politicians who have very little incentive to govern or compromise,” he said. “So it’s a terrible system, but this year it was all brought on by Donald Trump.”

“Yeah,” Carville agreed. “I think the Supreme Court did its part, but yeah, it wouldn’t have happened without Trump.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE COVERAGE OF MEDIA AND CULTURE

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and was referred to the following statement by RNC national press secretary Kiersten Pels:

“46% of Virginians voted Republican in the last federal election, yet Democrats are rigging the system to cling to power and silence voters they can’t win over. This map is an unconstitutional partisan power grab designed to disenfranchise millions of voters and tilt the playing field. Abigail Spanberger broke her promise to Virginians by advancing a gerrymandered map that serves her party’s interests after pledging she would not. The RNC will continue this fight in court to protect Virginia voters and ensure fair representation across the Commonwealth.”

Fox News Digital’s Paul Steinhauser, Jasmine Baehr, and Charles Creitz contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal