Latest
ChatGPT predicted the first round of the NFL Draft and here’s what it said
I’m not sure why I do these things to myself, but I decided to go head-to-head with ChatGPT in a mock draft competition. I recently released my final mock draft, and then I asked ChatGPT to predict the entire first round. Below, you will see where we are the same and where we are different.
Please don’t tell my bosses about this because if AI smokes me in the NFL Draft, they might realize that I’m not necessary. Pray for me, everyone.
OUTKICK MOCK DRAFT 3.0: COWBOYS MAKE BIG SPLASH, JETS SHORE UP SHAKY DEFENSE
One quick note before we begin: I projected a few trades, while ChatGPT mostly kept the current order intact (even though I didn’t explicitly tell it not to make trades), so some of our differences are about the shape of the board as much as the players themselves. Here we go!
GPT’s pick: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
Dan’s pick: Fernando Mendoza, QB, Indiana
GPT: Mendoza felt like the cleanest blend of quarterback need, consensus, and franchise-quarterback upside at No. 1.
Dan: No need for explanation, Mendoza is obviously going No. 1 overall.
GPT’s pick: Arvell Reese, LB/EDGE, Ohio State
Dan’s pick: David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech
GPT: I gave the Jets Reese because his versatility and defensive upside fit a team that needed juice all over that side of the ball.
Dan: I’m very confident that I am right and GPT is wrong here.
GPT’s pick: David Bailey, EDGE, Texas Tech
Dan’s pick: Arvell Reese, LB/EDGE, Ohio State
GPT: I put Bailey here because I thought Arizona would prioritize a pure edge profile over the more hybrid Reese.
Dan: Because I think I’m right about No. 2, I think I take a two-pick lead over GPT after the Cards pick Reese.
GPT’s pick: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame
Dan’s pick: Jeremiyah Love, RB, Notre Dame
GPT: Love looked like the kind of rare back who could change the identity of an offense right away.
Dan: There’s too much smoke around Love and the Titans to not think the fire comes on draft night.
GPT’s pick: Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State
Dan’s pick: Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami
GPT: I thought the Giants would use their first top-five pick on a tone-setting defender and circle back to the offensive line later.
Dan: I don’t hate GPT’s pick here and it could be right, but the Giants should be prioritizing protecting Jaxson Dart.
GPT’s pick: Spencer Fano, OT, Utah
Dan’s pick: Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State
GPT: I thought Cleveland would default to tackle because premium protection travels no matter who ends up at quarterback.
Dan: Again, I don’t hate the GPT pick here but I like the Tate selection for Cleveland more. However, the Browns typically shy away from taking receivers in the first round.
ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!
GPT’s pick: Washington Commanders – Carnell Tate, WR, Ohio State
Dan’s pick: Los Angeles Rams (trade up) – Makai Lemon, WR, USC
GPT: I kept Washington in place and gave it Tate because he felt like the safest receiver fit for a contender trying to keep feeding its offense.
Dan: The Rams feel like an obvious trade up candidate and the Commanders are a perfect trade down candidate, so I have Los Angeles sneaking into the Top 10 to grab a receiver.
GPT’s pick: New Orleans Saints – Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State
Dan’s pick: Dallas Cowboys (trade up) – Sonny Styles, LB, Ohio State
GPT: I had the Saints stay put and take Tyson because I thought they would prioritize adding a dynamic receiving threat.
Dan: GPT has Styles going No. 5 to the Giants, so the Cowboys couldn’t make this move in that scenario. We’re going to find out quickly who was more correct about this one.
GPT’s pick: Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami
Dan’s pick: Spencer Fano, OL, Utah
GPT: I thought Kansas City could wait on line help and grab an impact pass rusher before the edge board dried up.
Dan: Protecting Patrick Mahomes has to be priority No. 1 after the way last season went.
PROJECTED TOP 10 NFL DRAFT PROSPECT WAS DRIVER IN 2024 DEADLY CRASH
GPT’s pick: Francis Mauigoa, OT, Miami
Dan’s pick: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU
GPT: I had the Giants flip the order and address offensive line here after using No. 5 on defense.
Dan: Obviously, the Giants’ first selection is going to greatly affect this one. In my scenario, the team goes OL first, then defense.
GPT’s pick: Mansoor Delane, CB, LSU
Dan’s pick: Caleb Downs, S, Ohio State
GPT: I thought Miami would lean corner because Delane looked like the cleanest back-end starter left on the board.
Dan: I agree with GPT that corner is a major need for Miami, but this is a “best player available” selection based on how the board has gone so far.
GPT’s pick: Dallas Cowboys – Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon
Dan’s pick: New Orleans Saints (trade down) – Jordyn Tyson, WR, Arizona State
GPT: I kept Dallas at 12 and gave the Cowboys a safety because their secondary needed help almost as badly as the front seven.
Dan: Tyson might not last this long, but if he does, he’s a must take in this spot.
GPT’s pick: Los Angeles Rams – Makai Lemon, WR, USC
Dan’s pick: Washington Commanders (trade down) – Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee
GPT: I thought the Rams would stand pat and take Lemon as a polished receiver who could contribute right away.
Dan: It’s interesting that GPT and I both think the Rams take Lemon, just six picks apart.
GPT’s pick: Olaivavega Ioane, OL, Penn State
Dan’s pick: Rueben Bain Jr., EDGE, Miami
GPT: I thought Baltimore would lean into its usual best-lineman-available instincts and shore up the interior.
Dan: Again, this is very much a “best player available” situation.
GPT’s pick: Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami
Dan’s pick: Akheem Mesidor, EDGE, Miami
GPT: Mesidor felt like the right intersection of need, value, and immediate pass-rush help for Tampa Bay.
Dan: It’s been a while, but GPT and I have the same player to the same team at the same pick here.
GPT’s pick: Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana
Dan’s pick: Kayden McDonald, DT, Ohio State
GPT: After giving the Jets defense at No. 2, I thought their second first-rounder was better spent adding a receiver.
Dan: The Jets have to vastly improve one of the NFL’s worst defensive lines, even if that means using both first round picks on DL.
GPT’s pick: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama
Dan’s pick: Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia
GPT: I liked Proctor’s ceiling and power profile for a team that still wants to play bully-ball up front.
Dan: Same idea, different player.
GPT’s pick: Kayden McDonald, DT, Ohio State
Dan’s pick: Dillon Thieneman, S, Oregon
GPT: I thought Minnesota needed more interior defensive heft than another safety at this point in the board.
Dan: Another “best player available” spot where the Vikings probably want to trade down.
GPT’s pick: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon
Dan’s pick: Kenyon Sadiq, TE, Oregon
GPT: Sadiq made too much sense as a weapon who could stress defenses and help Bryce Young immediately.
Dan: Who needs machines if we’re just going to agree, am I right??
GPT’s pick: Chris Johnson, CB, San Diego State
Dan’s pick: Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn
GPT: I thought Dallas would use its second first-rounder on corner after spending its earlier pick on a front-seven defender.
Dan: After trading Micah Parsons, it makes sense to replace him with one of the picks acquired in the trade.
GPT’s pick: Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama
Dan’s pick: Omar Cooper Jr., WR, Indiana
GPT: I thought Pittsburgh would finally stop dancing around the quarterback issue and take Simpson before the slide continued.
Dan: I mocked Simpson to the Steelers earlier in the process, but I’m starting to get the feeling he’s heading to Arizona.
GPT’s pick: Peter Woods, DT, Clemson
Dan’s pick: Kadyn Proctor, OT, Alabama
GPT: I thought Jim Harbaugh would love Peter Woods as a tone-setting interior defender who could reshape the front.
Dan: Protecting Justin Herbert felt way too obvious to ignore if Proctor lasted this long.
GPT’s pick: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson
Dan’s pick: Blake Miller, OT, Clemson
GPT: Blake Miller felt like a very Eagles pick because they rarely pass on offensive-line value when it presents itself.
Dan: It’s funny to see that with all the major differences, we still have these random exact picks that line up perfectly later in the first round.
GPT’s pick: Cleveland Browns – Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee
Dan’s pick: Arizona Cardinals (trade up) – Ty Simpson, QB, Alabama
GPT: I thought Cleveland would stay put and address corner, while Arizona could wait or look for a quarterback later.
Dan: Remember when I said the Cardinals would get Simpson? Yeah, I think that’s here with a trade up to ensure they get a fifth-year option on the quarterback.
GPT’s pick: Zion Young, EDGE, Missouri
Dan’s pick: Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State
GPT: I thought Chicago would use this spot to juice the pass rush instead of continuing to stack linemen.
Dan: I can’t imagine the Bears won’t address their offensive line woes with their first round pick.
GPT’s pick: Keldric Faulk, EDGE, Auburn
Dan’s pick: Cashius Howell, EDGE, Texas A&M
GPT: I thought Faulk’s blend of size, power, and upside made him the cleaner Buffalo fit off the edge.
Dan: Same thoughts, different player.
GPT’s pick: Max Iheanachor, OT, Arizona State
Dan’s pick: Peter Woods, DT, Clemson
GPT: I thought San Francisco would look to the offensive line before addressing the defensive interior.
Dan: I originally mocked Iheanachor to the 49ers but after they locked up Trent Williams for two more years, I felt like addressing defensive line made more sense.
GPT’s pick: Christen Miller, DT, Georgia
Dan’s pick: Olaivavega Ioane, OL, Penn State
GPT: I thought Houston would finally devote a premium pick to the defensive interior instead of continuing to chase offensive-line fixes.
Dan: Houston has to solve its o-line problems.
GPT’s pick: Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson
Dan’s pick: Colton Hood, CB, Tennessee
GPT: I thought Kansas City would target a faster, stickier corner profile after addressing another need earlier in the round.
Dan: Same idea, different player.
GPT’s pick: KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M
Dan’s pick: KC Concepcion, WR, Texas A&M
GPT: Concepcion felt like the right kind of receiver for a Dolphins team trying to get younger and cheaper on offense.
Dan: This was the pick I was most surprised to see be the same.
GPT’s pick: Jermod McCoy, CB, Tennessee
Dan’s pick: Emmanuel McNeil-Warren, S, Toledo
GPT: I thought New England would buy the medicals and swing on McCoy’s corner talent late in the round.
Dan: Another “best player available” situation here for the Patriots.
GPT’s pick: Chase Bisontis, IOL, Texas A&M
Dan’s pick: Avieon Terrell, CB, Clemson
GPT: I thought Seattle would use the last first-rounder on the interior offensive line unless it traded back.
Dan: Seattle needs cornerback help, so that made the most sense to me.
Well, that’s it! So, who’s going to be more correct? Tune into the NFL Draft first round on Thursday night to find out!
Culture
Cracker Barrel Fans Outraged Again After NEW Major Change
Cracker Barrel built its reputation on comfort food, Southern tradition, and a menu customers could count on for decades.
That’s exactly why loyal diners are still fuming as the restaurant chain continues removing many of the classic dishes that helped make it a household name.
For years, customers have pleaded with the Tennessee-based chain to restore fan favorites that quietly disappeared from the menu, including black-eyed peas, fried haddock, red-eye gravy, fried chicken livers, and perhaps the most mourned item of all—the Sunrise Sampler.
For many longtime patrons, the Sunrise Sampler wasn’t just another breakfast. It was the breakfast.
The hearty platter came loaded with eggs, grits, fried apples, hash brown casserole, sausage, bacon, country ham, and biscuits with gravy—giving diners a taste of nearly everything Cracker Barrel had to offer without having to piece together a meal item by item.
“I noticed a while back that Cracker Barrel removed the GOAT of all breakfasts, the Sunrise Sampler, from the menu,” Josh Cooper, owner of Cooper’s Next Level BBQ in Tallahassee, Florida, told Fox News Digital. “You used to get a little bit of everything without breaking the bank.”
The meal hasn’t completely disappeared—but recreating it now comes with a catch.
Customers must order every component separately, turning what was once an affordable breakfast favorite into a considerably more expensive order.
“Now, in order to get that same teaser touch from the Sunrise Sampler, you have to order it all à la carte, which costs around $25 for the same great meal,” he said. “Blasphemy!”
Fox News Digital reached out to Cracker Barrel for comment.
The growing frustration over disappearing menu items comes after the company already faced a wave of backlash for attempting to modernize its image.
Last year, Cracker Barrel sparked outrage among longtime customers after unveiling a redesigned logo and updated restaurant interiors that many believed stripped away the rustic charm that had long defined the brand.
The changes were part of a sweeping $700 million overhaul across more than 660 locations, including menu revisions and a cleaner, less cluttered dining room design.
The company ultimately reversed course following widespread criticism, but many loyal customers say the damage had already been done.
The leadership shakeup continued last week when Cracker Barrel announced that CEO Julie Masino will step down on Aug. 10.
Former Bloomin’ Brands CEO David Deno is slated to take over.
For many customers, however, the issue extends far beyond a logo or a fresh coat of paint.
They believe corporate leadership has steadily chipped away at the very traditions that made Cracker Barrel stand apart from countless other restaurant chains.
Cooper said companies often underestimate the emotional attachment customers have to longtime menu favorites.
People are “asking for comfort and nostalgia.”
“The reality is that nostalgia matters. And when you remove popular items without controlling the narrative or managing customers’ expectations, you are bound to have upset patrons,” he said.
“Whether it’s due to rising food costs, kitchen timing or any other reason, it’s important to communicate with the people who put you on the map in the first place. Communication matters.”
Rachel Love, a self-described Cracker Barrel enthusiast from Tennessee, said one discontinued favorite remains at the top of her wish list.
“I absolutely loved the black-eyed peas, and I’m so glad they’re getting some attention,” Love told Fox News Digital. “They were one of my favorite sides and always felt like such a classic part of the Cracker Barrel experience.”
Love also hopes the restaurant revives its baked apple dumpling, describing it as “the perfect comfort dessert” for a brand built on old-fashioned hospitality.
To her, the debate is about much more than a handful of discontinued recipes.
“People aren’t just asking for old menu items — they’re asking for the comfort and nostalgia that came with them,” she said.
“Sometimes bringing back one classic dish means more to loyal customers than introducing several new ones.”
That may be the lesson Cracker Barrel continues to learn the hard way.
Customers aren’t asking the chain to reinvent itself.
They’re asking it to remember what made it successful.
They want the front porch.
They want the country store.
They want the breakfasts, the classic sides, and the timeless comfort food that turned Cracker Barrel into an American institution.
For many loyal diners, nostalgia isn’t a weakness.
It’s the brand.
Latest
Mamdani Kicked Out — He’s Livid After Latest Announcement
Backlash against New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani continues to mount, with the Democratic Socialist facing another public rebuke after reportedly being denied the opportunity to speak at the funeral of a U.S. Army soldier killed during an Iranian missile attack.
According to multiple reports, Mamdani attended Friday’s funeral for Army Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad in Queens but remained silent throughout the service after the soldier’s family reportedly chose not to have him address mourners.
Rampersad was one of three American service members killed in Jordan during an Iranian attack on July 17.
The funeral was held at a church in Ozone Park, where elected officials, community leaders, family members and fellow mourners gathered to honor the 28-year-old soldier’s sacrifice.
According to the New York Post, Mamdani appeared to review prepared remarks on an iPad while other dignitaries spoke, but his name was never called.
A source familiar with the funeral told The Post the decision came directly from Rampersad’s family, which reportedly wanted to keep politics out of the ceremony.
The family chose not to have Mayor Zohran Mamdani speak in an effort to avoid what the source described as “political distractions.”
After the funeral concluded, the mayor’s office released the remarks Mamdani had planned to deliver.
“It is often said that our fallen ‘gave their tomorrows for our today,’” Mamdani planned to say.
“Sergeant Rampersad had tomorrows waiting for her: birthdays, ordinary mornings, evenings spent with her loved ones,” his remarks continued.
“But she gave every one of them up so that we could have ours — so that we could stand here today, safe and protected,” he was to say.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, however, did address those gathered and offered an emotional tribute to the fallen soldier.
“I feel after reading and admiring this woman from a distance, I feel like she could be one of my daughters,” Hochul said.
Other speakers included Ozone Park Residents Block Association President Sam Esposito, state Sen. Joseph Addabbo Jr., and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards.
According to the Department of War, Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad, 28, of Ozone Park, New York, was killed in action during an enemy attack at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.
U.S. Central Command said Rampersad and two fellow service members were killed while American and coalition forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks.
The other fallen Americans were identified as 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas.
All three were deployed to Jordan in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, the international mission to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
Rampersad served with the 1st Battalion, 57th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52d Air Defense Artillery Brigade, 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command in Ansbach, Germany.
She worked as a 25U Signal Operations Support Specialist, according to the Department of War.
One person who attended the funeral told the newspaper the mayor appeared visibly upset after realizing he would not be invited to speak.
“He looked over at his staff, frustrated and seemed angry that he didn’t speak,” the source told the Post.
The attendee said Mamdani eventually understood that his name would not be called, glanced toward members of his staff, and put away the tablet that reportedly contained his prepared remarks.
Another source cited by the newspaper said the decision reflected the wishes of Rampersad’s family, describing them as politically conservative and supportive of President Donald Trump.
“The family is more conservative and wanted to limit any political distractions,” the source told the Post.
Neither Mamdani’s office nor members of the Rampersad family have publicly confirmed the account explaining why the mayor was not invited to speak.
Although he never addressed the congregation during the service, the mayor’s office later publicly released the remarks he had prepared, bringing attention to a moment that underscored the growing political controversy surrounding New York City’s new mayor.
Latest
GOP Just Passed It 232-288 — Pelosi And AOC Lose It On House Floor
The House of Representatives delivered a major victory this week for Americans with disabilities who want the opportunity to work instead of being trapped by a broken federal bureaucracy.
In a bipartisan vote, lawmakers approved legislation aimed at dismantling long-standing barriers within the Social Security Disability Insurance program that critics say have discouraged work and punished self-sufficiency for decades.
H.R. 8884, the **Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act**, sponsored by Rep. Austin Scott, R-Ga., passed the House by a vote of 232-188 and now heads to the Senate, where it has been referred to the Committee on Finance.
The legislation restores an important tool that the Social Security Administration lost when its demonstration authority expired in 2022.
Under the bill, the SSA would once again be authorized to test practical reforms under the Social Security Disability Insurance program through Dec. 31, 2030, with demonstration projects continuing through the end of 2031.
Rather than permanently rewriting federal law, the agency would be able to pilot innovative approaches designed to help beneficiaries who are able and willing return to the workforce.
The legislation includes significant safeguards. Participation would be entirely voluntary, and no participant could receive less total income as a result of joining one of the demonstration projects.
Supporters say those protections make the bill a common-sense effort to modernize a system that has too often discouraged Americans from pursuing employment.
House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., argued the current system is failing many of the very people it was designed to help.
“With over 60 percent of Social Security Disability Insurance recipients expressing an interest in returning to the workforce but less than one percent leaving the program because of a successful return to work each year, the Social Security Administration’s complex rules and regulations are clearly failing to deliver for too many Americans,” Smith said.
“Giving the SSA the authority to test innovative ways to better help disabled Americans pursue gainful employment is pure common sense, and this legislation goes a step further to ensure participation in any new system is both voluntary and will not reduce a beneficiary’s total income,” Smith added.
Smith pointed to what he described as a massive disconnect between Americans who want to work and those who are actually able to do so under the current system.
For years, disability recipients have warned that attempting to return to work can trigger a maze of complicated regulations, overpayment disputes, benefit cliffs, and uncertainty that ultimately makes taking a job financially risky.
Rather than encouraging independence, critics say the current structure often rewards staying on the sidelines.
Supporters argue H.R. 8884 takes a fundamentally different approach.
Instead of expanding government programs or imposing sweeping permanent reforms without evidence, the legislation gives the Social Security Administration the flexibility to test targeted solutions, evaluate the results, and determine what actually helps Americans reenter the workforce before making lasting policy changes.
Backers say the measure reflects a core conservative principle: government assistance should serve as a bridge to opportunity—not a permanent barrier to self-reliance.
The bill recognizes that having a disability does not automatically mean someone is unable to work and that federal policy should encourage those who are capable of seeking employment rather than penalizing them for trying.
The legislation also broadens the agency’s authority to include additional populations, including blind Americans, expanding the reach of future demonstration projects.
The proposal advanced through the House with bipartisan support after clearing the Ways and Means Committee, where lawmakers from both parties acknowledged that the current disability system leaves too many Americans behind.
Still, Republicans led the charge, arguing that practical reforms backed by measurable results are preferable to expanding entitlement programs or making permanent changes without first proving they work.
The bill now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers will decide whether to send it to President Donald Trump’s desk.
Supporters are urging swift action, arguing that restoring the SSA’s demonstration authority represents a fiscally responsible, low-cost reform that could help thousands of Americans regain the dignity, purpose, and financial independence that comes with meaningful work.
If enacted, the Social Security Administration would once again have the authority to launch carefully monitored pilot programs designed to improve employment outcomes, while reporting requirements would provide transparency and accountability as Congress evaluates which reforms deserve permanent consideration.
-
Economy4 months agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
Economy4 months agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Economy4 months agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
Economy4 months agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
Culture2 months agoMichelle Obama Drops Nasty Bomb About ‘Useless’ Daughter
-
Economy2 months agoPrayers Pour In After Fox Host Dies: ‘Senseless Murder’
-
Economy4 months agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
Latest2 months agoFox News Stuns With Announcement About 5 Fired Hosts
