Connect with us

Latest

FCC chairman questions NFL’s antitrust protection as league shifts to streaming services

Published

on

NFL fans will likely have to spend more to watch the league’s full slate of games each week in 2026. 

A YouTube TV “NFL Sunday Ticket” subscription can cost several hundred dollars, but does not provide access to every game. Fans must also subscribe to Amazon Prime, Peacock and Netflix to watch the full slate. All-in costs for these packages exceed $1,500, but that figure does not include fees or internet costs.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr has made it a priority to support American sports fans as the NFL, NBA, MLB and other leagues move key games from broadcast and cable television to costly streaming services. However, the NFL could lose its antitrust exemption if too many games are placed behind a paywall, Carr said this week.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

“Does the NFL still benefit from the antitrust exemption when they’re negotiating for carriage of games not on a sponsored telecast, but on a streaming service?” Carr said at an event in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, via Semafor. “That’s a very live, very ripe question.”

Carr cautioned there is “a point at which you sort of tip the scale, and they’ve just put too many games behind a paywall, and then that whole exemption collapses.”

NFL FANS CALL THE LEAGUE’S STREAMING STRATEGY A ‘MONEY GRAB’ AS COSTS SPIRAL OUT OF CONTROL

A 1961 law allows the NFL to negotiate leaguewide TV deals without violating U.S. antitrust rules, provided it meets certain conditions, including protecting customer access. The stakes are high if the NFL’s antitrust exemption goes away, particularly if individual franchises begin selling their TV rights separately.

Carr pointed to broader implications for media rights negotiations. “If the NFL teams were able to collectively negotiate,” he said, “should the broadcasters, perhaps, be able to collectively negotiate as well?”

Fox News Digital contacted the NFL for comment, but league officials did not immediately respond.

Last month, the FCC said it would seek public comment on the shift of live sports from broadcast channels to streaming platforms. The comment period runs through March 27, and replies are due April 13.

Carr acknowledged that the rising cost and sometimes inconvenient nature of sports streaming are frustrating fans, arguing the drawbacks ultimately outweigh the benefits.

Carr acknowledged the rising cost and sometimes inconvenient nature of sports streaming are frustrating fans, arguing the drawbacks ultimately outweigh the benefits.

“Americans are frustrated when they sit down and can’t find the game they want to watch. And that feeling grows only worse when they realize that they might need to sign up for another streaming service to watch the game,” Carr previously told Fox News Digital. 

“There has long been a strong and mutually beneficial relationship between sports leagues and broadcasters, and consumers will benefit if that continues,” Carr continued. “I want to see Americans continue to benefit from free over-the-air sports programming.”

Fox News’ Brian Flood contributed to this report.

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Continue Reading

Latest

Republican Shocks California With Stunning Election Night Comeback

Published

on

Republican Shocks California With Stunning Election Night Comeback

California voters headed to the polls Tuesday to begin the process of selecting a successor to Gov. Gavin Newsom, and one result immediately grabbed the attention of political observers across the country: Republican Steve Hilton’s surprisingly strong performance in the state’s gubernatorial primary.

Although millions of ballots remain outstanding and California’s lengthy vote-counting process means final results may not be known for days or even weeks, early returns indicate Hilton and former Biden administration official Xavier Becerra are on track to advance to a highly anticipated November showdown.

California’s June 2 primary operated under the state’s top-two election system, which places all candidates on a single ballot regardless of party affiliation. The two candidates receiving the most votes advance to the general election, creating a dynamic that often produces unpredictable outcomes.

Democrats entered the race with a significant numerical advantage but faced a challenge of their own making: a crowded field that threatened to divide support among multiple high-profile candidates. That concern appeared to materialize as results rolled in Tuesday night.

As of Wednesday morning, Hilton held the lead with approximately 28 percent of the vote, outperforming expectations and positioning himself as the early frontrunner. Becerra followed in second place with roughly 25 percent, while billionaire environmental activist Tom Steyer trailed in third at just under 20 percent despite investing heavily in his campaign.

The results left several well-known Democratic contenders on the outside looking in. Former Rep. Katie Porter, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, and former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa all failed to generate enough support to remain competitive, effectively ending their bids for the governor’s office.

Hilton’s strong showing is likely to energize Republicans who have struggled for statewide success in California for years. While Democrats still maintain a substantial registration advantage, the fragmented primary field created an opening that Hilton successfully capitalized on.

With ballots continuing to be counted, the exact margins remain subject to change. However, barring a dramatic shift in the outstanding vote, the race to replace Newsom appears increasingly likely to feature a head-to-head contest between Hilton and Becerra this fall.

The outcome sets the stage for what could become one of the nation’s most closely watched gubernatorial races, as voters in the country’s most populous state prepare to choose their next governor amid growing debates over the economy, public safety, homelessness, and the future direction of California.

Hilton’s strong performance quickly emerged as one of the night’s biggest surprises. The former Fox News host and onetime adviser to former British Prime Minister David Cameron entered the race as a political outsider, but his campaign gained momentum by tapping into voter frustration over California’s most persistent problems. Endorsed by President Donald Trump, Hilton focused heavily on issues such as homelessness, soaring housing costs, public safety concerns, burdensome regulations, and the state’s rising cost of living. Early results suggest that message struck a chord with voters increasingly dissatisfied with the status quo.

Becerra’s advancement to the projected runoff was significant in its own right. The former California attorney general and former Health and Human Services secretary under President Joe Biden mounted a late surge after months of uncertainty about whether any Democrat could emerge from the crowded field as the clear favorite. While he never fully united the party’s various factions, Becerra ultimately secured enough support to claim a spot in November’s general election. If successful, he would become California’s first Latino governor.

The results also highlighted growing divisions within California’s Democratic coalition. Establishment Democrats largely coalesced around Becerra, while many progressive voters gravitated toward billionaire activist Tom Steyer and other candidates. The fractured Democratic vote likely contributed to Hilton’s first-place finish and provided Republicans with a significant morale boost heading into the fall campaign.

National political observers are watching the race closely because of California’s outsized influence. Home to nearly 40 million residents and boasting a state economy worth more than $4 trillion, California often serves as a political bellwether and policy laboratory for the rest of the country. The state’s next governor will inherit a daunting list of challenges, including housing affordability, homelessness, wildfire preparedness, water management, and an increasingly unstable insurance market. Those concerns dominated voter conversations throughout the primary campaign and are expected to remain central issues in the general election.

Despite the early projections, election officials continue to count millions of ballots. California law allows valid mail ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted after polls close, meaning final vote totals could continue shifting over the coming days. Nevertheless, current returns strongly indicate that Hilton and Becerra are positioned to advance to a November showdown.

Beyond the governor’s race, Californians also voted in a number of congressional and statewide contests that could have national implications. Several competitive House districts are expected to become major battlegrounds as both parties fight for control of Congress.

For now, however, the spotlight remains firmly on Hilton. By outperforming expectations and finishing atop the primary field, he demonstrated that Republicans may possess more political strength in California than many analysts assumed. Democrats remain the favorites in a state that has voted reliably blue for decades, but Tuesday night’s results suggest the race to replace Gavin Newsom could be far more competitive than initially anticipated.

Continue Reading

Latest

NIH Researchers Allegedly Smuggled Monkeypox Into America, Lied About It

Published

on

‘I do this all the time’
Continue Reading

Latest

Supreme Court Rebukes Effort To Force Race-Based House Map On Deep Red State

Published

on

‘race-based discrimination’
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal