Latest
Stephen Colbert and me: How late-night partisan comedy works – until it doesn’t
Stephen Colbert and I go way back.
I’ve interviewed him many times.
I’ve been on his show, he’s been on my show.
Whether or not you agree with his liberal crusading – and half the country can’t stand it – his final show raised questions about political retribution, a splintered media universe and the crumbling future of late night itself.
THE ART OF PERFECTION: HOW TRUMP SURVIVES EVEN HIS WORST BLUNDERS THROUGH SHEER REPETITION
Putting aside the cosmic conclusions for a moment, I first interviewed Colbert when Comedy Central was giving “The Daily Show” correspondent an eight-week tryout as host of his own show, and he didn’t know if it would last. He was congenial and about as quick-witted as any comedian I’ve seen, possibly matched by Jon Stewart.
While playing a blowhard conservative anchor on “The Colbert Report,” he once took a mild swipe at me. I had reported, factually, on Fox that some Republicans and right-wing media figures were taking shots at Hillary Clinton’s age, 69, and arguing she had a double liability as potentially the first female president.
AOC, RO KHANNA AND THE MEDIA’S RUSH TO FLOG A CONTEST THAT IS 18 MONTHS AWAY
Colbert transformed that into MY declaring that Hillary was too old. That was flat-out wrong, but I know how these things go.
So I made a great show of being offended and hit back with a sarcastic take: “It’s about time someone took on Stephen Colbert. This guy – a fake anchor if ever there was one – has been maligning hard-working journalists for too long. Journalists like me… Well, two can play this game, buddy.”
(Some of my critics took the shtick a tad too seriously.)
That didn’t stop Colbert from inviting me as a guest when my book “Reality Show” was out. He was friendly and I had a good time. I guess I shouldn’t have been shocked that most of my funny lines were edited out and most of his were kept in.
He was the big star.
Colbert, 62, raised in South Carolina, is a practicing Catholic and former altar boy who has a form of vertigo and, during one taping, was rushed to the hospital with a ruptured appendix.
Once leaving Comedy Central, he was signed by CBS’s “Late Show” and landed in third place.
But after hiring producer Chris Licht from “Morning Joe,” Colbert went fully partisan and fervently anti-Trump. He once called Trump “the Antichrist” (adding that he was joking). He shot up to No. 1.
That was a double-edged sword. Why deliberately alienate half his audience? It was like drinking a magic elixir that contained a slow-acting poison pill.
Meanwhile, Colbert’s interviews with the likes of Barack Obama and Joe Biden were, shall we say, rather gentle.
The ratings were good enough that CBS suits tried to sign Stephen to a long-term contract.
But last year, Colbert accused the network of accepting “a big fat bribe.” He was referring to CBS paying $16 million to settle a long-shot Trump lawsuit over a deceptively edited “60 Minutes” segment.
This happened to take place as Paramount was waiting for the administration’s approval for its attempted takeover of Warner Bros. Discovery – which, what a surprise, came through a week later.
That’s all it took. Paramount, owned by Trump’s pals Larry and David Ellison, announced the “Late Show” was being canceled. Without so much as consulting with the network’s biggest star or discussing ways to trim his 200-person staff.
Trump exclaimed that “I absolutely love” the move.
This was political retaliation, pure and simple. No one believes the “only for financial reasons” hogwash.
But CBS has turned the long goodbye into a national event, as Colbert has constantly slammed the network. What could the brass do when they’ve already fired him?
Celebrity guests in the final weeks have included Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, Jon Stewart, Steven Spielberg, Bruce Springsteen and founding host David Letterman, who helped him throw furniture off the roof to smash the CBS eye logo. (I thought that was a bit cheesy given Colbert’s goal of an amicable parting.)
Friendly rivals Jimmy Kimmel and Jimmy Fallon agreed to air reruns last night to shift the spotlight to the curtain call in the Ed Sullivan Theater.
The “Late Show” is being replaced by comedian Byron Allen, who’s vowing to steer clear of politics on his prerecorded show and is actually paying CBS many millions for the airtime.
And that brings us to the cold hard math.
Colbert’s show was losing tens of millions of dollars a year. That’s not sustainable. The 11:35 p.m. shows on CBS, ABC and NBC draw a fraction of the audience compared to the days of Johnny Carson, when you actually had to stay up late to watch his needle-both-sides comedy.
Colbert and Kimmel each drew over 2.5 million viewers and Fallon 1.3 million last quarter, which is not bad in this environment. But Jay Leno, at the peak of his career, was averaging 5 to 6 million.
Now the main impact of these nighttime shows comes from the brief clips that many watch the next morning.
Do I think late-night shows will be around in five years? Sadly, probably not. The digital age has brought round-the-clock competition for eyeballs, from social media to group chats, from podcasts to Substack. All available in seconds on your phone or watch.
That makes me nostalgic, but I also don’t listen to AM radio anymore or have a Walkman. Technology marches on.
One thing is sure: Stephen Colbert will have no trouble making ends meet.
Border & Security
Woke Judge Who Hid Illegal From ICE Learns Her Fate — Courtroom Erupts!
A federal judge dealt another setback to former Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan on Tuesday, upholding her conviction for helping an illegal immigrant evade federal immigration authorities and rejecting her request for reconsideration.
The ruling marks the latest development in a case that has become a flashpoint in the national debate over immigration enforcement and whether public officials can interfere with federal efforts to apprehend individuals living in the country illegally.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman declined to overturn Dugan’s conviction and also refused to establish a new sentencing date after previously postponing sentencing from June 3.
Dugan, a former Milwaukee County Circuit Court judge, was convicted in December on obstruction-related charges stemming from her actions involving Mexican national Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, an illegal immigrant whom federal authorities were attempting to arrest.
Her legal team argued that the conviction should be reconsidered based on a recent federal appeals court ruling in United States v. Hernandez. In that case, an immigrant detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement escaped custody, was later recaptured, and convicted of obstructing a pending immigration proceeding. The conviction was ultimately overturned on appeal.
Dugan’s attorneys argued that Flores-Ruiz was not involved in a pending proceeding at the time of the incident but was instead the subject of an arrest warrant.
In a statement following Tuesday’s decision, Dugan’s lawyers called Adelman’s ruling “wrong.”
However, the federal judge rejected the argument and found that the circumstances of Dugan’s case were significantly different.
“At oral argument, defendant noted that ICE goes out every day to try to arrest people on the street,” Adelman wrote in his ruling.
He further summarized the defense’s position by writing, “Given the estimated 10 million undocumented persons in the United States, does that mean there are 10 million pending proceedings?”
Adelman noted that Dugan “insists that there needs to be some formality, i.e., a proceeding before an agency involving parties trying to come to a determination, an adjudication.”
“The problem for the defense is that this case did not involve some random encounter on the street,” he continued.
“It was a targeted operation, conducted pursuant to agency procedures, including the issuance of an arrest warrant for a specific person, Eduardo Flores-Ruiz.”
The case drew national attention earlier this year after federal authorities accused Dugan of actively helping Flores-Ruiz avoid apprehension by federal agents.
According to prosecutors, Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, along with agents from the FBI, DEA, and Customs and Border Protection, arrived at the courthouse on April 18 intending to arrest Flores-Ruiz following a scheduled court appearance.
Flores-Ruiz was facing three misdemeanor battery charges and was accused of assaulting two individuals.
Federal authorities alleged that after learning agents were waiting to take Flores-Ruiz into custody, Dugan directed law enforcement personnel away from the area and then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his attorney through a restricted jury door, bypassing the public exit where federal agents were stationed.
Prosecutors argued that the actions were intended to help Flores-Ruiz avoid arrest.
The controversy quickly escalated, leading to Dugan’s arrest and subsequent removal from judicial duties.
In April, the Wisconsin Supreme Court issued an administrative order directing Dugan to be “temporarily relieved of her official duties” while the case proceeded.
The incident also drew sharp criticism from then-Attorney General Pam Bondi, who questioned how a sitting judge could allegedly interfere with a lawful federal arrest operation.
“We could not believe that a judge really did that,” Bondi said.
“You cannot obstruct a criminal case. And really, shame on her. It was a domestic violence case of all cases, and she’s protecting a criminal defendant over victims of crime,” Bondi added.
Bondi also highlighted the allegations against Flores-Ruiz, describing the violence that prosecutors say led to the criminal charges.
“[He] beat the guy, hit the guy 30 times, knocked him to the ground, choked him, beat up a woman so badly; they both had to go to the hospital,” she said.
With Adelman refusing to reconsider the conviction, Dugan now faces sentencing on the obstruction charge, which carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison. While first-time offenders rarely receive the maximum sentence, the case has become a prominent example of the Trump administration’s broader emphasis on enforcing immigration laws and holding public officials accountable when they interfere with federal law enforcement operations.
Supporters of stricter immigration enforcement argue that the ruling sends a clear message that no one—including judges—is above the law when it comes to obstructing federal authorities carrying out their duties. As sentencing approaches, the case is likely to remain at the center of the national debate over immigration, public accountability, and the rule of law.
Latest
Winner Announced In Hotly-Contested GOP Primary
President Donald Trump scored another major political victory Tuesday night as Rep. Barry Moore cruised to victory in Alabama’s Republican Senate runoff, further cementing the president’s unmatched influence within the Republican Party.
Moore, a three-term congressman and longtime Trump ally, defeated former Navy SEAL Jared Hudson in a closely watched race to replace outgoing Sen. Tommy Tuberville, who is leaving the Senate to pursue Alabama’s governorship this November.
The race was viewed nationally as another test of Trump’s political strength heading into the midterm election cycle. Despite media speculation and polling that suggested a potentially close contest, Moore ultimately delivered a decisive victory, defeating Hudson by 18 percentage points and reinforcing the power of a Trump endorsement in Republican politics.
Trump’s backed candidates have enjoyed an impressive track record throughout the 2026 election season, with voters repeatedly rallying behind candidates who embrace the president’s America First agenda.
Following his victory, Moore thanked supporters and highlighted the close working relationship he has built with President Trump over the years.
“When I call him, he takes my calls,” Moore told supporters after the race was called.
The congressman also urged Republicans not to take future elections for granted despite the party’s recent success.
“We’ve got the White House. We’ve got a delegation that’s pretty conservative, but it’s vitally important that we show up and vote,” Moore said.
Moore has long been one of Trump’s most loyal supporters in Congress. As a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, he was an early supporter of Trump’s first presidential campaign and has consistently backed the president’s policy priorities throughout both administrations.
Just days before the runoff election, Trump delivered a strong endorsement that many political observers believe helped propel Moore to victory.
“Barry Moore has my complete and total endorsement. He’s the best America First candidate you can imagine,” Trump said.
Hudson entered the race as a political outsider and attempted to capitalize on voter frustration with Washington. The former Navy SEAL forced Moore into a runoff after a strong showing in the initial primary election and campaigned heavily on his military service and lack of political experience.
Throughout the campaign, Hudson argued that Alabama needed a fresh voice in Washington and frequently contrasted his military background with Moore’s congressional tenure.
Leaning heavily on his service record, Hudson pledged to be “a warrior for President Trump’s ‘America First’ agenda.”
“If you want the same thing over and over again, elect a career politician. If you want different results, somebody who can take your issues to Washington and not bring the stupidity of Washington back here to you, send a warrior to Washington,” Hudson said during a candidate forum in May.
Despite Hudson’s energetic campaign, Moore successfully convinced Republican voters that proven conservative leadership and a demonstrated record of supporting Trump mattered more than outsider credentials alone.
Throughout the race, Moore pointed to his voting record and conservative ratings as evidence that he has consistently delivered for Alabama voters.
“Look at my record, the most conservative member in the Alabama delegation, an ally of the president,” Moore said. “The president has endorsed me because he’s seen me in the fire. I never bow down.”
For many Alabama Republicans, experience and results ultimately proved decisive.
“He’s the best qualified, I can tell you that — no question,” said Bob Marshall, 91, after casting his ballot for Moore in Pike Road outside Montgomery.
Hudson continued to highlight his military accomplishments throughout the campaign, often noting that while he lacked a legislative scorecard, he had accumulated an impressive combat record.
Hudson has quipped that he doesn’t have a legislative scorecard, but has racked up a high score “against the Taliban in over 60 combat operations.”
Some voters found that message compelling.
“I like the fact that he was willing to put his life on the line for our country,” said Julian Metheny, 70, who voted for Hudson in Shelby County.
With Tuesday’s victory, Moore advances to the general election as the clear favorite in a deeply Republican state. The result also adds to a growing list of Trump-endorsed candidates who have prevailed this year, underscoring the president’s continued dominance within the GOP and the enduring appeal of the America First movement among Republican voters.
Culture
Elon Musk Just Put A Deadline On Earth — ‘Mark My Words’
Elon Musk is warning that the future of artificial intelligence may not be on Earth at all.
During a recent podcast appearance, the billionaire entrepreneur and founder of SpaceX argued that the biggest obstacle facing the next generation of AI isn’t software, computing power, or engineering talent. Instead, Musk believes the limiting factor will be something far more basic: electricity.
As artificial intelligence systems become increasingly sophisticated, they require enormous amounts of energy to train and operate. Data centers powering advanced AI models already consume vast quantities of electricity, and demand continues to surge as companies race to develop more powerful systems.
According to Musk, that growth trajectory is rapidly approaching a point where existing power infrastructure simply won’t be able to keep pace.
Rather than viewing AI development as primarily a software challenge, Musk sees energy production as the critical bottleneck that could determine how far and how fast the technology advances in the coming years.
He pointed to America’s current power consumption as an example of the challenge ahead. The United States consumes roughly half a terawatt of electricity on average, and significantly increasing that capacity would require a massive expansion of power generation infrastructure.
Building enough new power plants to meet future AI demand would be expensive, time-consuming, and politically challenging. Environmental regulations, permitting requirements, and local opposition often slow major energy projects, creating additional hurdles for rapid expansion.
Musk believes these constraints will force technology companies to begin looking beyond Earth much sooner than many experts currently anticipate.
In fact, he predicts that within the next two to three years, it could become economically advantageous to operate large-scale AI systems in space rather than on the ground.
While the idea may sound like science fiction, Musk argues that the economics increasingly favor orbital computing facilities.
One of the biggest advantages is access to uninterrupted solar energy.
Solar panels on Earth lose efficiency due to weather, cloud cover, nighttime conditions, and atmospheric interference. Space-based solar arrays, by contrast, can receive nearly continuous sunlight while avoiding many of the energy losses associated with terrestrial systems.
As a result, orbital solar systems can generate substantially more power than comparable installations on the ground.
The implications for AI are enormous.
Modern AI systems require not only tremendous computing resources but also vast amounts of electricity to keep servers running around the clock. Data centers must also devote substantial energy to cooling systems that prevent processors from overheating.
Musk noted that one of the major benefits of operating in space is the ability to eliminate many of the energy storage challenges that exist on Earth.
When continuous solar power is available, the need for large battery systems is dramatically reduced. Eliminating battery infrastructure lowers costs, improves efficiency, and simplifies operations.
The comments come as AI companies continue investing billions of dollars into new data centers and computing infrastructure. Industry leaders have increasingly acknowledged that energy availability is becoming one of the most important factors influencing future AI development.
Major technology firms are already exploring partnerships with utilities, investing in nuclear energy projects, and securing long-term power agreements to meet anticipated demand.
Musk believes those efforts may ultimately prove insufficient if AI capabilities continue advancing at their current pace.
His prediction also aligns with SpaceX’s broader vision of expanding humanity’s presence beyond Earth. While discussions about colonizing Mars often capture headlines, Musk’s latest comments suggest that space-based computing and energy production could become a practical commercial reality much sooner.
If his forecast proves accurate, the next major leap in artificial intelligence may not come from a breakthrough algorithm or a new software model. Instead, it could come from moving the world’s most powerful computers beyond Earth’s atmosphere and into orbit, where virtually unlimited solar energy could fuel the next generation of technological innovation.
For Musk, the race to build smarter AI may ultimately become a race to find enough power to sustain it—and that race could soon lead straight into space.
-
Economy2 months agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
Economy2 months agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Economy2 months agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
Economy2 months agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
Economy2 months agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
Economy2 months agoTrump Pulls Off Miracle Of A Lifetime — It’s Permanently Open
-
Economy2 months agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Economy1 month agoBarack Obama Just Made Insane Announcement About His Marriage
