Latest
More patients demand ‘unvaccinated’ blood, doctors warn of growing health risks
An increasing number of patients are requesting “unvaccinated” blood for transfusions, which can delay care and pose risks to patients’ health, experts warn.
There is no evidence that unvaccinated blood presents any safety benefit, according to a new study published in the journal Transfusion.
There is currently no process for checking whether donated blood comes from vaccinated or unvaccinated donors, experts say.
CANCER SURVIVAL APPEARS TO DOUBLE WITH COMMON VACCINE, RESEARCHERS SAY
Vanderbilt University in Tennessee, which conducted the research, received 15 requests for unvaccinated blood between Jan. 1, 2024, and Dec. 31, 2025. The median age of patients was 17 years old and more than half were children, the university reported.
Thirteen of the patients received blood donated specifically for them by family members, which is known as “direct donation.” This can be risky, because most direct donors are giving blood for the first time, and their donations are more likely to contain “potentially harmful pathogens,” the authors noted.
“Despite being framed as ‘safer,’ directed donations may paradoxically increase risk.”
COVID VACCINE UNDER NEW SCRUTINY AFTER STUDIES REVEAL POSSIBLE HEALTH RISKS
Among the studied patient group, two became much sicker after refusing a standard blood transfusion.
One patient developed anemia, a condition where the body lacks enough healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen. The other developed hemodynamic shock, a serious condition in which there is insufficient blood flow and oxygen to the body’s tissues, potentially leading to organ failure.
Requests for unvaccinated blood spiked after the approval of COVID-19 vaccines, posing a “recurring challenge for transfusion services and clinicians,” the researchers stated.
“These requests were associated with care delays, escalation and inefficiencies,” they indicated.
FAMILY PLEADS FOR HELP AS TEEN FACES LIFE-THREATENING BONE MARROW FAILURE
The researchers recommend that health systems create standardized policies to handle these types of requests.
“Regulatory and professional organizations have opposed these non-evidence-based policies, emphasizing that blood centers do not record or convey donor COVID-19 vaccination status and that evidence demonstrates transfusion from vaccinated donors poses no unique risk.”
The Vanderbilt study had some limitations, the researchers noted. It looked at a small number of cases and only included situations where special blood donations made it to the blood bank, so it doesn’t show how often people made this request overall.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES
It also didn’t include cases where concerns were resolved through conversations with doctors or ethics teams, the team noted.
As this was an observational study and not a controlled experiment, it only showed an association and could not prove that refusing standard blood directly caused any specific patient outcomes.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER
Several states have introduced proposals aimed at allowing patients to receive blood specifically from donors who have not received COVID-19 vaccines.
In Oklahoma, one such proposal called for the creation of a state-run blood bank dedicated to collecting and distributing blood from unvaccinated donors. Despite these efforts, none of the measures have been enacted into law.
Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, was not involved in the research, but said these types of requests are “part of an ongoing fear culture.”
“It is also very difficult to test for, because the antibodies may be positive from COVID itself as well as the vaccine, and it can be difficult to tell the difference,” he told Fox News Digital.
The notion that receiving blood from someone who had the vaccine would be harmful is not based on any scientific studies, the doctor reiterated.
“If people want to group up to get blood from other unvaccinated people, I respect that choice, though it will be expensive and will limit options,” Siegel added.
Diane Calmus, vice president of government affairs for America’s Blood Centers in Washington, D.C., said that requests for direct donations are “exceedingly rare” – representing about 0.06% of the U.S. blood supply.
“Requests for unvaccinated blood are something we’ve seen wax and wane since the introduction of the COVID vaccine,” Calmus, who also was not involved in the Vanderbilt study, told Fox News Digital. “The challenge is that there’s no way to tell whether someone’s blood has been vaccinated – there’s no test that exists.”
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
Any situation where someone requires a blood transfusion is most likely a “very scary time,” she noted.
“Family members want to be cautious, and this is why it’s so important that people talk to a transfusion medicine-trained doctor,” the expert advised. “These are physicians who have a specialty in blood transfusions … and who can answer those questions that any individual will have.”
Calmus pointed out that it takes some time to facilitate a direct donation, and that there is a specific process in place.
“Blood has to be prescribed. You can’t just show up at the blood center and say, ‘I would like my sister to donate for me,’” she said. “There needs to be a prescription. It needs to go through the hospital … they need to make sure it is the right blood for the right patient.”
Calmus emphasized that the U.S. blood supply is “meticulously tracked,” and that there have been no indications of a lack of safety. She also stressed the ongoing need for blood donors.
“We need people – vaccinated or not vaccinated – to show up and donate blood, because it is the blood on the shelves that saves lives.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Vanderbilt researchers for comment.
Latest
Lindsey Graham Finally Learns His Fate
South Carolina Republicans delivered a decisive victory Tuesday night to incumbent Senator Lindsey Graham, handing the longtime lawmaker a commanding win in one of the most closely watched Senate primaries of the 2026 election cycle.
The race attracted national attention as Republicans work to protect and potentially expand their Senate majority ahead of the midterm elections. With Democrats continuing to push progressive policies in Washington, GOP leaders have emphasized the importance of maintaining experienced conservative voices in the upper chamber.
Graham entered Election Day with several significant advantages, including the endorsement of President Donald Trump, strong support from South Carolina’s Republican establishment, and a lengthy record of statewide victories.
Not long after polls closed, major outlets projected Graham as the winner over businessman Mark Lynch, ending months of campaigning and reaffirming the senator’s strong standing among Republican voters in the Palmetto State.
Throughout the campaign, Graham emphasized his support for President Trump’s agenda and his commitment to fighting what he described as efforts by the political left to fundamentally reshape the country. He frequently highlighted battles over judicial appointments, election integrity, border security, and Democratic proposals involving structural changes to the federal government.
The senator’s alliance with President Trump proved particularly important in a state where the president remains enormously popular among Republican voters. Trump’s endorsement gave Graham a powerful boost and helped solidify support among conservatives who may have once questioned the senator’s relationship with the president during earlier stages of Trump’s political rise.
While Graham focused on his record and support for the Trump agenda, Lynch spent much of the final weeks of the campaign responding to a series of controversies involving his personal history, financial disclosures, and campaign operations.
According to reports, questions emerged regarding Lynch’s financial filings and the source of millions of dollars he contributed to his own campaign. The allegations generated increased scrutiny as Election Day approached and prompted calls for further review of campaign finance records.
Additional attention focused on Lynch’s past criminal history. Lynch has publicly acknowledged a 1984 felony cocaine trafficking conviction and has spoken openly about overcoming addiction and rebuilding his life. He has also claimed that he later received a presidential pardon.
However, recent reports raised questions regarding documentation of that pardon. According to published reports, searches of publicly available Justice Department records did not locate evidence supporting the claim, and Lynch reportedly acknowledged difficulties locating records through his legal team.
Further scrutiny surrounded a separate legal matter from the mid-1980s involving allegations connected to an accident. Lynch has disputed characterizations of the incident and maintained that some reporting on the matter has been misleading.
Graham’s campaign repeatedly highlighted those issues throughout the race while also questioning Lynch’s preparedness for federal office.
President Trump weighed in forcefully during the campaign and made clear where his loyalties stood.
The president endorsed Graham and sharply criticized Lynch, calling him a “LUNATIC” and warning that he would be a “DISASTER for the Republican Party.”
Despite receiving support from former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene shortly before the election, Lynch struggled to gain traction against the well-funded incumbent.
“I am done watching Lindsey Graham sell out America,” Greene wrote on X.
Graham campaign spokeswoman Abby Zilch argued that the race ultimately represented a choice between Republicans working alongside President Trump and factions she believed were undermining his agenda.
“Senator Graham believes that South Carolina is Trump country, not MTG/Massie country,” Zilch said.
She added that Graham is proud to have the support of Trump, Sen. Tim Scott, and what she described as legions of pro-Trump Republicans throughout the state.
The victory gives Republicans another reason for optimism heading toward November. South Carolina remains one of the nation’s most reliably Republican states, and Graham is widely expected to enter the general election as a heavy favorite.
For President Trump, the result also serves as another demonstration of his continued influence within Republican politics. Once again, voters in a major GOP primary overwhelmingly sided with the candidate carrying the president’s endorsement, reinforcing Trump’s role as the dominant figure in the Republican Party as the 2026 midterm elections approach.
Latest
Senate Passes It With 52-46 Vote — Chuck Schumer Explodes
The U.S. Senate has overwhelmingly approved bipartisan legislation designed to crack down on the illegal export of American semiconductor technology, delivering another major victory for efforts to protect U.S. national security and maintain America’s technological advantage over China.
The legislation, known as the Stop Stealing Our Chips Act, now heads to the House of Representatives, where supporters hope it will quickly gain approval before reaching President Donald Trump’s desk for signature.
South Dakota Republican Senator Mike Rounds, the lead sponsor of the bill, praised the Senate’s passage of the legislation and emphasized the growing threat posed by China’s efforts to acquire advanced American technology.
“I look forward to working with our colleagues in the House to get this important legislation through Congress and to President Trump’s desk to be signed into law,” said South Dakota Republican Sen. Mike Rounds, who lead the bill.
Rounds originally introduced the legislation in April 2025 alongside Democratic Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, demonstrating rare bipartisan agreement on one of Washington’s most pressing national security concerns.
If enacted, the measure would amend the Export Control Reform Act and establish a new whistleblower reward program within the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), which operates under the U.S. Department of Commerce.
The goal is straightforward: identify and stop illegal schemes used to smuggle American-made semiconductor technology into China.
Semiconductors are the foundation of modern technology, powering everything from smartphones and advanced computing systems to military weapons platforms and artificial intelligence applications. As competition between the United States and China intensifies, controlling access to cutting-edge chip technology has become a central component of American national security strategy.
“I am pleased that the Stop Stealing our Chips Act has passed the Senate,” Sen. Rounds said.
“The United States has taken extensive measures to prevent American-made semiconductors from falling into the wrong hands, particularly China; however, China continues to smuggle these chips into their country,” Rounds added.
The senator warned that China’s continued efforts to obtain advanced American chips pose significant risks as artificial intelligence technologies become increasingly powerful.
As the use of artificial intelligence continues to expand across both civilian and military sectors, the importance of safeguarding advanced semiconductor technology has never been greater.
“Our legislation would strengthen BIS’s export control enforcement by rewarding whistleblowers with credible information on illegal actions to come forward,” said Sen. Rounds.
Under the bill, the government would establish a secure reporting platform for whistleblowers and create a dedicated fund to compensate individuals who provide credible information leading to successful enforcement actions.
According to the proposal, whistleblowers whose information results in penalties against violators could receive between 10 percent and 30 percent of the fines collected. The legislation also includes confidentiality protections and safeguards against retaliation.
The program would be funded entirely through fines assessed against export-control violators rather than taxpayer dollars.
The Senate’s action comes amid broader efforts by the Trump administration to strengthen America’s economic and technological position on the world stage.
Earlier this month, President Trump traveled to China for a high-profile summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping. The meeting focused on a range of issues, including trade, artificial intelligence, manufacturing, and economic cooperation.
Following the summit, Trump announced that China had agreed to purchase 200 Boeing aircraft, a deal that could provide a substantial boost to one of America’s most important manufacturing companies.
In an interview with Fox News host Sean Hannity, Trump described his discussions with Xi in positive terms and highlighted the significance of the agreement.
According to Trump, the conversations were “very good,” and the commitment exceeded expectations.
While specific details regarding aircraft models and delivery schedules have not yet been released, industry observers view the agreement as a major development for Boeing and American manufacturing.
Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg, who joined Trump’s delegation, previously described the trip as “a meaningful opportunity” for the company and expressed optimism regarding potential aircraft orders.
Together, the Senate’s action on semiconductor security and Trump’s efforts to expand American exports underscore a broader strategy aimed at protecting critical industries while strengthening U.S. economic leadership.
As China continues seeking access to advanced technologies, supporters of the legislation argue that safeguarding America’s semiconductor advantage is no longer merely an economic issue—it is a national security imperative.
Latest
Prayers Pour In After Fox Host Dies: ‘Senseless Murder’
The sports and podcasting world is mourning the loss of James “Uncle Jimmy” Dodds, the beloved media personality and longtime friend of commentator Jason Whitlock, after authorities confirmed his death in what Whitlock described as a “senseless murder.”
Dodds, a father of five, became well-known to audiences through his appearances alongside Whitlock on television and later through the popular “Fearless” platform, where his humor, honesty, and larger-than-life personality made him a fan favorite.
Authorities have confirmed that three suspects are currently in custody and facing charges in connection with the homicide. While investigators have not yet released full details surrounding the circumstances of the crime, news of Dodds’ death sent shockwaves through viewers and supporters who had followed his work for years.
Whitlock shared the heartbreaking news in a public statement that reflected both personal grief and deep frustration over the circumstances surrounding his friend’s death.
“Three young black men are in custody for the senseless murder of Uncle Jimmy Dodds, father of five, my former TV/podcast sidekick, my longtime friend. My resolve to speak against the demonic culture celebrated as “black culture” has deepened. RIP, Jimmy.”
The tribute quickly spread across social media, prompting an outpouring of condolences from fans, fellow media personalities, and members of the broader sports community.
For many viewers, Dodds was much more than a recurring guest. His chemistry with Whitlock helped create some of the most memorable moments on “Speak for Yourself” after he joined the program in 2018. His unfiltered commentary, quick wit, and willingness to speak his mind gave the show a unique dynamic that resonated with audiences.
When Whitlock later expanded his independent media efforts through podcasts and digital platforms, Dodds remained a familiar and welcome presence. Fans often viewed him as the everyman voice in conversations about sports, culture, family, and current events.
Unlike many media personalities who carefully craft a public image, Dodds built a reputation for authenticity. Whether discussing serious issues or sharing humorous stories, he connected with audiences because he came across as genuine and relatable.
His ability to inject humor into difficult conversations and his obvious friendship with Whitlock helped make him one of the most recognizable figures associated with the “Fearless” brand.
The tragedy has also reignited broader conversations about violent crime and the impact such losses have on families and communities. Dodds leaves behind five children, relatives, close friends, and countless supporters who now must cope with his sudden absence.
Whitlock’s remarks suggest that the loss has strengthened his commitment to speaking out on cultural issues he believes contribute to violence and the breakdown of family structures. While investigations into the homicide continue, Whitlock made clear that the death of his longtime friend has deeply affected him both personally and professionally.
For those who knew Dodds, either personally or through his media appearances, the focus remains on remembering the man behind the microphone.
He was a father, a friend, a trusted confidant, and a personality who brought laughter and authenticity to every conversation he joined.
As tributes continue to pour in from across the country, many are remembering “Uncle Jimmy” not simply for his media work, but for the relationships he built and the lives he touched along the way.
His passing leaves a void that will be difficult to fill, but his legacy as a devoted father, loyal friend, and unforgettable voice in sports and cultural commentary will not soon be forgotten.
-
Latest2 months agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News2 months agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Latest2 months agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News2 months agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News2 months agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
Latest2 months agoTrump Pulls Off Miracle Of A Lifetime — It’s Permanently Open
-
News2 months agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Latest1 month agoBarack Obama Just Made Insane Announcement About His Marriage
