Latest
Chris Evert says Jannik Sinner ‘shouldn’t have been allowed’ to leave court during French Open controversy
Tennis legend Chris Evert made the case for special treatment for the sport’s top players. But then she explained why Jannik Sinner shouldn’t have gotten it the way that he did.
That’s the uncomfortable middle ground in tennis’ latest medical-timeout controversy.
Stars drive the sport. They carry television windows, ticket sales, sponsorships, interest and two-week Grand Slam marathons. It’s not naive or corrupt to acknowledge that Sinner, Carlos Alcaraz, Novak Djokovic, Aryna Sabalenka and Coco Gauff are not treated like anonymous qualifiers. They aren’t anonymous qualifiers.
CHRIS EVERT DEFENDS MARTINA NAVRATILOVA ON TRANS ATHLETES: ‘SCIENCE DOESN’T LIE’
Evert, the 18-time Grand Slam singles champion, told OutKick in a text message that “the top players still drive the game,” and that if tennis wants its biggest stars to have longevity, “there should be a little more consideration of their schedule in a two-week event.”
“They’ve earned that,” Evert said.
She’s right.
But there’s a difference between scheduling consideration and in-match rule interpretation. It’s one thing to give stars the best courts, the best windows and the best recovery opportunities over the course of a tournament. It’s another thing entirely to give those players a more generous interpretation of the rules when the rulebook clearly says muscle cramping does not qualify for a medical timeout.
That’s where Evert drew the line with Sinner.
“It was clearly a cramping and dehydration situation,” Evert told OutKick. “The rules state cramping is not an injury. He shouldn’t have been allowed to go off the court.”
Sinner, the world No. 1, was stunned by Juan Manuel Cerundolo, the world No. 56, in the second round of the French Open on Thursday after arguably the most dramatic collapse of his career. Sinner won the first two sets, led 5-1 in the third, then unraveled physically before losing the final three sets.
That’s what makes this controversy more interesting than a simple accusation of favoritism.
Sinner lost.
This is not a case of a superstar being saved by an official and riding that advantage to victory. It’s not a case of tennis handing one of its biggest names a win. Cerundolo still pulled off the upset.
But the controversy matters anyway because the bigger issue is not one match result. It’s whether the same rules are being applied the same way when the player asking for help is one of the faces of the sport.
TNT commentator Jim Courier stated that problem in real time.
“That’s not fair. That’s not right,” Courier said on the broadcast. “We love the top players, they drive the sport, but you’ve gotta apply the rules fairly. The rules are being bent for the top players.”
That’s a strong accusation. It also hit on something every sports fan understands.
The rulebook is only half the story. The other half is how it gets enforced when the athlete involved is a superstar.
To be clear, Sinner should not be treated as the villain here. Evert made that point, too.
“That was the umpire’s call, and he should not be faulted,” Evert said. “He was given that choice by the umpire, and chose it.”
That exchange appears to be exactly what happened.
According to The Times, Sinner told chair umpire Aurélie Tourte that he thought he might vomit and asked what would happen if he took too much time between points. Tourte reportedly explained that he could receive a time violation and then a code violation, or they could call the physio to determine the issue.
Sinner then said he did not know if it was dehydration, and Tourte told him it was up to him.
That is why Evert’s distinction matters. Sinner was not trying to game the system. He told the chair umpire what was wrong, she gave him a choice, and he made a decision.
What was Sinner supposed to do? Turn down medical attention and voluntarily make his own path harder in the middle of a Grand Slam match?
No serious athlete is doing that.
ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!
Patrick Mahomes isn’t going to tell an official to pick up a roughing-the-passer flag. Tom Brady wasn’t going to tell Jerome Boger that Grady Jarrett’s sack was actually clean. Carlos Alcaraz wasn’t going to wave off a medical timeout at the Australian Open once the physio granted it, despite protests by his opponent.
Stars accept favorable decisions. In fact, all athletes do. That’s sports.
The burden is on the officials, not the athlete benefiting from the call.
And that’s why tennis put itself in such an awkward position. The Grand Slam rulebook says players may receive treatment for muscle cramping only during normal changeovers or set breaks. It also says players may not receive a medical timeout for muscle cramping.
That sounds clear.
But tennis also leaves room for medical judgment. If there is doubt about whether a player is dealing with cramps, an acute medical condition or heat illness, the Sports Physiotherapist and Tournament Doctor have the final say. If cramps are considered part of a heat-illness situation, they can be treated as part of that broader condition.
That may be medically reasonable. It may even be necessary.
No one should want tennis players passing out on the court because officials are afraid of looking too lenient. If a player is dizzy, dehydrated, vomiting or in actual danger, the sport has an obligation to treat that seriously.
Evert acknowledged that possibility.
“I think, if there was dizziness or the feeling of passing out, then a doctor could’ve come out on the court and taken his pulse and blood pressure,” Evert said, “but that’s another situation.”
That feels like the right line.
Player safety? Absolutely.
A cramping timeout dressed up as something else? That’s where trust starts to erode.
Evert later told OutKick she rewatched the clip and believed the umpire “stopped the clock in his favor.” She also said Sinner “specifically said dehydration,” while again emphasizing that it was “no fault of his own.”
“It will be interesting to see how the umpire defends her position,” Evert said. “Jim Courier and all the commentators were very critical of this decision, and I would think the rules will have more boundaries now because it has happened in favor of the top players.”
There’s the real story.
Not that Sinner cheated. He didn’t.
Not that tennis is rigged. That’s a lazy conclusion.
The real issue is that tennis keeps finding itself in moments where the rulebook seems firm until a superstar enters the gray area. Then, suddenly, the sport looks like it has room to maneuver.
This isn’t the first time in 2026 that the sport has faced similar controversy.
At the Australian Open, Sinner struggled physically in the heat during a third-round match against American Eliot Spizzirri. Sinner started cramping. The match was paused when the roof was closed under the tournament’s heat policy. The Italian star did not receive treatment during the stoppage, so it was not the same situation as a medical timeout for cramps.
But the perception issue was similar.
Sinner admitted afterward that he “got lucky” with the timing of the heat rule and roof closure. Evert brought up that match, too, telling OutKick, “Do you remember that Australian Open that was basically the same thing? He was starting to cramp and then they close the roof, right?”
Again, the roof closure may have been completely within the rules. The Australian Open had a heat policy. Officials followed it. Sinner got a break within the structure of the tournament.
But it still looked familiar: a top player in physical trouble, a stoppage, a reset and a second life. In that case, Sinner looked like a new player after the break and defeated Spizzirri en route to a semifinal appearance.
Alcaraz was involved in another version of the same conversation at the Australian Open when Alexander Zverev complained about a medical timeout during their semifinal. Zverev believed Alcaraz was cramping and said afterward that players normally cannot take a medical timeout for cramps.
Alcaraz eventually defeated Zverev and followed with a win over Novak Djokovic to capture the Australian Open title and complete the career Grand Slam.
“What can I do?” Zverev said. “It’s not my decision. I didn’t like it, but it’s not my decision.”
That sounds a lot like Evert’s point about Sinner.
The player doesn’t make the ruling. The official makes the ruling.
This certainly isn’t unique to tennis. Football fans have been arguing about the same thing for years.
The NFL rulebook does not say Patrick Mahomes gets more protection than his backup. It did not say Brady deserved a softer landing than everyone else. But fans, players and commentators have long believed that star quarterbacks get the benefit of the doubt from officials.
Sometimes that perception is overblown. Sometimes it is fueled by frustration, gambling, team loyalty, social media outrage or a combination of all of them.
But then a call happens in a huge spot, and the perception comes roaring back. And sometimes, perception matters as much, if not more, than reality.
Mahomes benefited from controversial penalties in Kansas City’s 2025 playoff win over the Houston Texans. Troy Aikman criticized one of the calls in real time. Officiating expert Ben Austro of Football Zebras later wrote for SB Nation that two of the controversial penalties should not have been called, including one that he said “fans the flames of preferential treatment.”
Brady had his own version of this in 2022, when Grady Jarrett was flagged for roughing the passer after sacking him late in a Buccaneers-Falcons game. The call extended Tampa Bay’s drive and helped end Atlanta’s comeback attempt.
Brady’s response afterward was simple.
“I don’t throw the flags.”
Correct.
And Jannik Sinner doesn’t make the call on whether he gets a medical timeout.
Stars are always going to get advantages. They get the primetime window. They get center court. They get larger crowds. They get more media attention. They get more sponsor interest. They get more institutional attention because the sport is more valuable when they are healthy, present and advancing deep into tournaments.
Just like the NFL playoffs are better when Mahomes, Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, Joe Burrow and other marquee quarterbacks are healthy and competing.
There’s nothing inherently wrong with pointing out the obvious.
Evert is right that tennis should consider its top players’ schedules and longevity, especially during two-week Grand Slam events. The best players have earned that level of consideration because they’re the ones who consistently carry the sport. They have earned those advantages through their on-court performance.
But that consideration should happen before the match.
That’s what makes these medical-timeout controversies so damaging. Even when the decision is medically defensible, even when no one did anything malicious, even when the star loses anyway, fans are left wondering where legitimate discretion ends and star treatment begins.
The answer is not to deny medical care to players in real danger. The answer is transparency and consistency.
If a player is dizzy, close to fainting or dealing with heat illness, say that. Bring the doctor out. Check the player. Make the medical reason clear. If cramps are part of a broader heat-illness diagnosis, explain that. If it’s simply cramping and dehydration, enforce the rule.
Tennis does not need a perfectly level playing field. No sport has one.
But it needs a credible one.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE OUTKICK SPORTS COVERAGE
Sinner does not deserve blame for taking the option he was given. But he also did not deserve a different version of the rules because he’s Jannik Sinner.
Both can be true.
And if tennis wants to avoid this conversation the next time Sinner, Alcaraz or another star starts struggling physically in a major match, it has to make the boundary clearer now.
Because stars should get the big courts, the big crowds and the big moments.
They’ve earned that.
What they haven’t earned, and what no athlete should ever earn, is a different interpretation of the rulebook because of their star power.
Economy
Warren Buffett Makes Shocking Announcement
An extraordinary era in American business is coming to an end.
Warren Buffett is officially stepping away from the chairman’s seat at Berkshire Hathaway, closing another chapter in a remarkable run that stretched for more than half a century and turned the legendary investor into one of the most influential figures in modern business.
Berkshire announced Friday that Buffett, 96, will become chairman emeritus effective immediately. He isn’t cutting ties with the company entirely, however, and will remain on Berkshire’s board of directors.
Taking his place as chairman will be his son, Howard Buffett.
Howard has served as a Berkshire director since 1993 and has spent decades leading the Howard G. Buffett Foundation. His elevation to chairman represents another major piece of a succession plan Berkshire has been preparing for years.
For Warren Buffett, the announcement marks the latest — and one of the most significant — steps away from the company he spent decades building into a corporate powerhouse.
Buffett had served as Berkshire Hathaway’s chairman since 1970.
During that time, he oversaw an extraordinary transformation, taking what had once been a struggling textile business and building it into a massive conglomerate with operations spanning insurance, railroads, energy, manufacturing, retail and services.
His influence over the company’s day-to-day operations had already begun to diminish.
Buffett stepped down as Berkshire’s chief executive late last year, turning control of the company over to longtime lieutenant Greg Abel.
Now the chairman’s title is changing hands as well.
Friday’s announcement means Berkshire is entering a new era in which Abel runs the company’s operations while Howard Buffett oversees the board.
Warren Buffett, however, isn’t disappearing.
As chairman emeritus, he will remain a director and continue providing his judgment and perspective to the company’s leadership — preserving a connection between Berkshire’s future and the man who shaped its identity for generations.
Following the announcement, Abel paid tribute to the enormous impact Buffett has had on the company.
“Warren’s impact on Berkshire and its owners is without parallel in the history of American business,” Abel said in a statement. “The culture Warren built and the values he championed will remain at the heart of Berkshire, and Howard will be their guardian.”
That culture became almost as famous as Buffett himself.
Rather than chasing every new market trend, Buffett built his reputation around patience, long-term investing, disciplined acquisitions and a straightforward approach to evaluating businesses.
Under his leadership, Berkshire accumulated an enormous portfolio of operating companies while also becoming famous for taking major stock positions in some of America’s most recognizable corporations.
Along the way, Buffett became more than a corporate executive.
His annual shareholder letters, public appearances and Berkshire shareholder meetings turned the Omaha investor into one of the world’s most closely followed voices on investing, business and the American economy.
But the transition away from Buffett has been unfolding for some time.
Last year, Buffett announced that Abel would become Berkshire’s top executive. He later signaled that his own public presence would shrink, including fewer appearances at Berkshire’s annual meeting and an end to writing the company’s annual shareholder letter.
Howard Buffett’s move into the chairman’s position wasn’t unexpected either.
The younger Buffett had long been identified as an important part of Berkshire’s eventual succession structure, with his father previously describing the chairman’s role as a safeguard for the company’s distinctive culture and values once he was no longer overseeing daily operations.
That succession plan is now becoming reality.
Greg Abel is running Berkshire as CEO.
Howard Buffett is taking control of the board as chairman.
And Warren Buffett — after more than five decades at the center of one of the most remarkable corporate transformations in American history — is moving into an advisory role as chairman emeritus.
The legendary investor may still have a seat at the table.
But the company he built is officially moving into its post-Buffett leadership era.
Culture
Dolly Parton Delivers Stunning Video Message Weeks After Her Death
Dolly Parton had one final message for the music world — and it was delivered after her death.
The country music legend appeared on screen Wednesday night during the 2026 Americana Honors & Awards, where she was posthumously honored with the Americana Lifetime Achievement Award.
Parton died Aug. 25 at the age of 80 following what was described as a “brief battle with cancer.”
But before her death, Parton had recorded a video accepting the prestigious honor. When it played before the audience Wednesday night, fans were given one more chance to hear from the woman whose unmistakable voice, personality and songwriting helped define generations of American music.
And in classic Dolly fashion, she opened simply.
“Well, hey, it’s Dolly. I’m honored to be receiving a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Americana Music Association.”
Parton then looked back at where it all began — in Tennessee’s Smoky Mountains, surrounded by the roots music that would eventually help propel her from humble beginnings to worldwide fame.
“I mean, roots music, or what is now called Americana music, is what I grew up playing back in the Smoky Mountains,” Parton continued. “It’s that same music that drew me back to East Tennessee in 1997 to write and record my album, Hungry Again. And that project really opened the door to a series of bluegrass and acoustic albums that changed the course of my career in so many ways.”
Those projects brought Parton back to the acoustic sounds of her childhood while introducing her music to another generation of listeners.
Looking back, Parton recognized just how important that chapter had become.
“Now, new fans discovered these albums, new Americana music communities embraced them, and now looking back at it all, I see this era of my career as a musical renaissance of sorts,” Parton said. “I want to thank everyone at the AMA for recognizing me with this award. It’s a great honor truly, and just know that I will always love you.”
Those final words carried unmistakable weight.
“I will always love you” wasn’t merely a farewell. It was also a poignant reference to one of the most famous songs Parton ever wrote — turning the closing moments of her prerecorded acceptance into an especially emotional goodbye.
The tribute didn’t end there.
Dolly Parton posthumously accepts award in pre-recorded Lifetime Achievement speech 🤍 pic.twitter.com/dRzCHuzc0Q
— TMZ (@TMZ) September 17, 2026
Longtime friend and fellow country music icon Emmylou Harris took the stage to remember Parton’s extraordinary journey from a young Tennessee singer with enormous ambitions to one of the most recognizable entertainers in the world.
Harris recalled the pivotal moment in 1967 when Parton joined Porter Wagoner’s television program, an opportunity that helped introduce her to a national audience.
But Harris made clear that Parton was never destined to remain in someone else’s shadow.
“In 1967, Dolly got a good start on her big dream when she landed a gig as the girl singer with Porter Wagoner. Their duets were a hit on the show and on the charts, but Dolly was nobody’s sidekick. She wanted more and she deserved more, and she set out to get it always, always on her own terms,” Harris, 79, said. “And we all know what happened when Dolly set her sights on something.”
What happened was a career that exploded far beyond the boundaries of country music.
Parton became a crossover pop success, a movie star and an internationally recognized entertainer while maintaining the East Tennessee identity that remained central to her public image and music.
Her songwriting alone established an enormous legacy. But Harris reminded the audience that Parton’s talents went far beyond the songs she wrote.
“She was one of our all-time greatest songwriters, but she shined just as brightly on stage,” Harris shared. “She lit up the TV screen and then she, she lit up the movie screen.”
Then there was the personality.
Parton’s ability to move an audience with a song and, moments later, make that same audience laugh became one of the trademarks of her decades in the spotlight.
“Her stunningly beautiful, pure mountain voice could make us cry and then crack us up with a well-aimed, sometimes body joke,” Harris said. “There was nothing Dolly couldn’t do, and so she did it.”
The evening’s tribute ultimately returned to the music.
Brandi Carlile and I’m with Her performed Parton’s “Coat of Many Colors,” one of the songs most closely associated with her upbringing and remarkable journey from the Smoky Mountains to international superstardom.
Parton was honored alongside other recipients at Wednesday’s ceremony, including Led Zeppelin frontman Robert Plant.
But it was Parton’s own prerecorded words that provided one of the night’s most poignant moments.
A final appearance. A final thank-you.
And an ending that could hardly have been more fitting:
“Just know that I will always love you.”
Latest
Get Ready — Mike Pence Makes Stunning 2028 Announcement
Former Vice President Mike Pence is making his plans for 2028 clear — and another run for the White House apparently isn’t part of them.
After years of political upheaval, a failed 2024 presidential campaign and a dramatic break with President Donald Trump, Pence said this week that he currently has no plans to seek the presidency — or any other elected office — in 2028.
The former vice president addressed his political future during an appearance at the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., where chairman David Rubenstein pressed him about whether voters could see his name on another presidential ballot.
“What I can tell you is that we have no plans,” Pence replied.
Rather than gearing up for another campaign, Pence said his attention is centered on his family and Advancing American Freedom, the conservative policy organization he founded after leaving the White House.
Pence said he intends to use his public platform to continue advocating for the conservative principles that have defined much of his career, including lower taxes, limited government, reduced regulation, traditional values and opposition to abortion.
“The calling of my life right now is to be a champion for these principles,” Pence said.
The comments put considerable distance between Pence and the emerging 2028 presidential contest, even as Republicans begin looking ahead to the next battle for the White House.
Pence has been down that road before.
In 2023, he launched a Republican presidential campaign that put him directly against Trump, his former running mate and the president he served alongside for four years. But Pence struggled to gain traction and suspended his campaign in October 2023, months before Republican voters began casting primary ballots.
He later declined to endorse Trump in the 2024 election.
Trump ultimately secured the Republican nomination and returned to the White House.
But the political split between the two men goes back much further.
Pence served as Trump’s vice president from 2017 until 2021 after previously serving as Indiana governor and a member of Congress. Their once-close political alliance fractured following the 2020 presidential election and the events surrounding Jan. 6, 2021.
Trump urged Pence, who was presiding over the congressional certification of the Electoral College vote, to reject or delay certification of Joe Biden’s victory.
Pence refused, concluding that the Constitution gave him no authority to do so.
Years later, he remains unapologetic about that decision.
“It was the easiest decision I’ve ever made,” Pence said. “By God’s grace I did my duty that day.”
Since leaving office, Pence has remained active in Republican politics, but increasingly as a voice arguing for a more traditional strain of conservatism as parts of the GOP have embraced populist policies.
Through Advancing American Freedom and his public appearances, Pence has continued promoting free markets, limited government, a strong American role overseas and socially conservative policies.
Earlier this year, he argued that Republicans should determine what principles they want their party to stand for before becoming consumed with the question of who should carry the GOP banner in 2028.
Now Pence appears to be taking himself out of that conversation — at least for the time being.
Notably, he stopped short of declaring that he would never seek public office again. His wording was narrower: He has “no plans” to run in 2028.
For the foreseeable future, however, Pence says his focus is on advancing his political philosophy rather than launching another campaign.
And his willingness to publicly challenge Trump hasn’t disappeared.
Earlier this year, Pence broke with the president over the possibility that people involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot could receive taxpayer-funded compensation.
Speaking with Axios while discussing his book *What Conservatives Believe*, Pence described Jan. 6 as a “tragic day” and drew a firm line when it came to people who committed violence against law enforcement.
“I didn’t agree with the President when he pardoned people who engaged in violence against law enforcement officials,” Pence said.
Then he went further.
“And it would be my hope that anyone who engaged in violence against law enforcement or at the Capitol building would never be rewarded with taxpayers’ money.”
The comments underscored a political divide that has persisted years after Pence left the vice presidency.
For now, Pence appears prepared to remain part of the conservative debate — just not as a candidate in 2028.
-
Economy5 months agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
Economy5 months agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Economy5 months agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
Culture3 months agoMichelle Obama Drops Nasty Bomb About ‘Useless’ Daughter
-
Economy5 months agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
Economy3 months agoPrayers Pour In After Fox Host Dies: ‘Senseless Murder’
-
Latest3 months agoFox News Stuns With Announcement About 5 Fired Hosts
-
Economy5 months agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
