Latest
Ellen Burstyn on the habits she gave up to stay thriving at 93 years old
Ellen Burstyn is sharing her secrets to longevity at 93.
During a recent appearance on the “Literally! With Rob Lowe” podcast,” the actress, who recently released her new book “Poetry Says It Better: Poems to Help You Wake Up,” revealed the habits that she gave up to adopt the healthy lifestyle that has kept her thriving into her ninth decade.
“I don’t drink alcohol. I don’t smoke cigarettes anymore. I don’t smoke marijuana anymore,” the Oscar winner said.
She continued, “I don’t eat meat. I have a plant-based diet. I exercise, walk my dog several mornings a week or almost every morning a week, and have a trainer, workout in the gym.”
DICK VAN DYKE, 99, CREDITS DITCHING TWO BAD HABITS FOR HIS NEAR-CENTURY LONGEVITY
“So I live a healthy life and it pays off,” Burstyn added.
While appearing on “Live With Kelly and Mark” last Tuesday, “The Exorcist” star said that she still exercises every day, noting that she particularly enjoys taking walks in New York City’s Central Park.
“That’s how you get to be 93 and still kicking,” Burstyn told co-hosts Kelly Ripa and Mark Consuelos.
JANE SEYMOUR’S KEY TO STAYING FIT AT 74 WITHOUT STRICT DIET
Burstyn previously opened up about her choice to embrace a healthy lifestyle during a 2023 conversation with her “Law and Order: Organized Crime” co-star Christopher Meloni for Interview magazine.
The “Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore” actress pointed to eating well, becoming a vegetarian and avoiding alcohol, smoking, and drugs as key decisions.
“That’s what I decided after doing all those bad things for a couple of decades,” she said.
Burstyn explained that she also keeps her mind active through reading, creative work and maintaining a social life.
At the time, Burstyn questioned if ageism in Hollywood is a myth and revealed that her career was busier than “ever” at the age of 90.
Burstyn expressed her surprise over being offered so many roles in her later years, telling Meloni, “This is so bizarre. I turn 91 in December and I’m busier than I can ever remember being at any point in my career.”
JANE SEYMOUR TELLS WOMEN TO ACT THEIR AGE AND NOT TO ‘PRETEND TO BE 20 WHEN YOU’RE 70’
“And I don’t understand it at all,” she continued. “I mean, what’s all this stuff about ageism in Hollywood? How did I get left out of it?”
When the 62-year-old actor asked Burstyn for her thoughts on the reason behind her continually robust career, the Michigan native offered one theory.
“I don’t know, except possibly that everybody else who could play those parts has already died, so I’m the only actress still standing who can play the great-grandmother or something,” she said.
After Meloni asked Burstyn asked what keeps her going and excited to work at her age, she shared that she begins every day with gratitude.
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
“I try to have the first words out of my mouth be, ‘Thank you,’” she said. “Thank you that I’m alive. Thank you that I’m safe. Thank you that I’m healthy. Thank you that I’m 90 and still going. Thank you for my doggies. I mean, I have a lot to live in a state of gratitude for.”
In “Law & Order: Organized Crime,” Burstyn played Bernadette “Bernie” Stabler, the troubled, bipolar mother of Meloni’s character Detective Elliot Stabler. Burstyn originated the role during the tenth season of “Law & Order: Special Victims Unit” when she appeared in the episode “Swing,” earning the Primetime Emmy Award for outstanding guest actress in a series for her performance.
She became a recurring guest star in the “Law & Orde: Organized Crime” starting in the “Law & Order” spinoff’s second season in 2021.
Last month, NBC announced that it had canceled “Law & Order: Organized Crime” after five seasons.
Burstyn will next be seen in the upcoming drama film “Place To Be,” which also stars Taika Waititi, Pamela Anderson, Édgar Ramírez, Lena Waithe, Murray Bartlett and Maika Monroe.
Latest
Rudy Giuliani hospitalized in critical but stable condition: ‘He’s fighting’
Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani has been hospitalized and is in critical but stable condition, according to a statement posted Sunday on X.
Ted Goodman, a political strategist who launched a livestream program with Giuliani, posted about the hospitalization on Sunday evening.
“Mayor Rudy Giuliani is currently in the hospital, where he remains in critical but stable condition,” Goodman wrote. “Mayor Giuliani is a fighter who has faced every challenge in his life with unwavering strength, and he’s fighting with that same level of strength as we speak.
“We do ask that you join us in prayer for America’s Mayor Rudy Giuliani,” he added.
After learning the news, President Donald Trump called Giuliani the “Best Mayor” in New York City’s history.
“Our fabulous Rudy Giuliani, a True Warrior, and the Best Mayor in the History of New York City, BY FAR, has been hospitalized, and is in critical condition. What a tragedy that he was treated so badly by the Radical Left Lunatics, Democrats ALL — AND HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “They cheated on the Elections, fabricated hundreds of stories, did anything possible to destroy our Nation, and now, look at Rudy. So sad!”
The hospitalization comes nearly eight months after Giuliani was seriously injured in a car crash in New Hampshire.
Fox News Digital learned at the time that Giuliani was flagged down by a woman fleeing a domestic-violence incident. The former mayor helped the woman and called 911, remaining at the scene until police arrived.
He later left the scene and was traveling on the highway when the vehicle he was riding in was struck from behind at a high speed. New Hampshire State Police said the crash happened just before 10 p.m. on Interstate 93 in Manchester.
Troopers and fire personnel were already on the southbound side handling the reported domestic-violence incident when they witnessed a two-vehicle collision on the northbound side. Both vehicles ended up in the median and were heavily damaged, according to police.
TRUMP TO AWARD RUDY GIULIANI THE PRESIDENTIAL MEDAL OF FREEDOM: ‘GREAT AMERICAN PATRIOT’
Giuliani’s head of security and spokesman, Michael Ragusa, told Fox News Digital at the time that he was in “good spirits and recovering tremendously.”
Giuliani was diagnosed with “a fractured thoracic vertebrae,” along with multiple lacerations and contusions and injuries to his left arm and lower leg, Ragusa said.
“This was not a targeted attack,” Ragusa added in a post on X.
“We ask everyone to respect Mayor Giuliani’s privacy and recovery, and refrain from spreading unfounded conspiracy theories.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Giuliani’s business partner and medical provider went to the hospital to oversee his care, according to Ragusa.
Fox News Digital’s Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report.
Latest
Liberal Icon And Former Congressman Warns Democrats From Deathbed Against Moving Too Far Left
Latest
Did the Biden administration purposefully ignore COVID vaccine side effects?
The effort to promote COVID vaccines to the general public took many forms. Experts like Anthony Fauci downplayed the extreme difference in risk between age groups, asserting that everyone should be vaccinated, regardless of youth or a lack of other health-related risk factors.
The former CDC director, Rochelle Walensky, made the completely unsupported claim that “vaccinated people don’t carry the virus” and “don’t get sick,” promises that were false at the time and proved humiliating later.
Former President Joe Biden said that unvaccinated people should prepare for a “winter of severe illness and death” in 2021-2022. He also tried to force all private businesses with more than 100 employees to enforce vaccine mandates. There were vaccine passports, university mandates, and of course, the pinnacle, or nadir, or COVID absurdity, Stephen Colbert’s “The Vax-scene.”
But the other side of the incessant push for more COVID vaccine uptake was the purposeful downplaying or denying of potential side effects and their impact on the risk-benefit calculation.
MAJOR STUDY REVEALS WHY COVID VACCINE CAN TRIGGER HEART ISSUES, ESPECIALLY IN ONE GROUP
One of the tools for measuring those side effects is the VAERS, or Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. And Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) has released a new report on how that system may have been purposefully ignored by a Biden administration desperate to promote uptake.
Johnson’s new report, released last week, contains some potential bombshell revelations about Biden administration health officials’ conduct regarding potential safety signals.
The report came from an investigation by the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which requested documents from the Department of Health and Human Services on the VAERS system at the height of the pandemic in early 2021.
Some of the submitted documents covered Dr. Ana Szarfman, described as a “senior medical officer and safety data mining developer at the Food and Drug Administration. Szarfman, Johnson says, “used an updated data analysis technique that identified dozens of statistically significant safety signals for adverse events associated with the COVID-19 vaccines.”
The report says she “immediately shared her findings with other FDA officials,” particularly those “responsible for COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance.”
Surely, there would be some interest at the FDA in further investigating safety signals, particularly knowing that recommendations from other experts would rely on their findings. Well, instead, the report says those officials “largely ignored her and eventually told her to stop her data analyses.”
SCIENTISTS FIND CLUES ON WHY COVID VACCINE CAUSES CHRONIC HEALTH PROBLEMS IN SOME
Not what you want to hear. But what did Szarfman actually find?
Well, Johnson’s report says that she found in her data analysis that there were nearly 50 examples of “extreme masking.” Essentially, masking means that one very common signal in data makes others harder to find. Szarfman and Dr. William DuMouchel, then chief statistician at Oracle and the inventor of the data mining algorithm in effect at the FDA, found that the “extreme masking” had covered up roughly 20-25 examples of “statistically significant” safety signals for adverse effects. Those adverse effects had not been “previously detected” by the FDA and included “sudden cardiac death, Bell’s palsy, and pulmonary infarction.”
Dr. Szarfman, Johnson says, continued sharing updated findings of similar safety signals several times throughout the early part of 2021 as vaccine policies and recommendations were rolling out.
WASHINGTON POST EDITORIAL CONNECTS MISINFORMATION BY BIDEN TO WHY PEOPLE BELIEVE CONSPIRACY THEORIES
Instead of taking these findings seriously and looking into them further, the Biden-FDA wanted her to stop looking. The report says that “one senior FDA official wrote to his colleagues, ‘[b]efore we potentially reach out to Ana, we should meet internally — many considerations not suited to email.’”
Another expert, Dr. Peter Marks, warned that the data mining “create erroneous conflicts that feed in to anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
By June 2021, Dr. Szarfman had emailed another FDA employee about conversations between the FDA and CDC about the potential “myocardial events” associated with COVID-19. She attached a data analysis showing “higher statistically significant safety signals for acute myocardial infarction,” and added that they’d “detected clear signals for other similar events.”
COVID VACCINE BOOSTERS CALLED INTO QUESTION BY FDA CHIEF: ‘VOID OF DATA’
What did the FDA do with this information? Well, basically nothing. Sounds about right.
VAERS has limitations, being a reporting system rather than controlled scientific study. It’s subject to bias and can be misleading. However, with an all-important question like this, and known limitations regarding masked data, it seems absurd that there was so little interest in further investigating.
ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!
It would be absurd, if it didn’t fit perfectly into the pattern of behavior from the FDA and other experts at the time. They downplayed the risk of myocarditis or other health-related side effects, particularly for young men, leading to unnecessary risks being taken by say, college students or others in that age group to whom COVID posed vanishingly small possibility of severe illness.
They ignored that it had become clear, almost immediately, that the vaccines had little-to-no efficacy against infection. Choosing instead to continue pushing for mandates and passports based on their false assumptions.
There was no interest in further examining safety signal data because it would have undermined their desire to push for universal uptake. Even if that investigation had found that the potentially elevated safety signals were overblown. It simply wasn’t a priority, because it could have fed into “anti-vax” sentiment. That’s what concerned them, not finding the truth.
You don’t need to be “anti-vax” to want to have all available information. And concerns about COVID vaccines in particular should not be conflated with skepticism or distrust of all vaccines. But the more stories and reports of this nature emerge in the post-pandemic period, showing just how disinterested many officials were, the more they encourage that type of thinking. It’s their own fault, and they refuse to acknowledge it.
-
Latest3 weeks agoVance Leaves Meeting, Looks Straight Into Camera, Announces Stunning Arrest
-
News2 weeks agoAdam Schiff Facing 30 Years In Prison After Bank Records Leak
-
Latest3 weeks agoSupreme Curt Sides With Trump — He Can Remove The All
-
News3 weeks agoAll Hell Breaks Loose On Fox When Jesse Watters Asks Fetterman One Question
-
News3 weeks agoNBC Stops LIVE Broadcast — Breaks Big Trump News
-
News3 weeks agoSwalwell Facing Jail Time After Sickening New Video Leaks
-
Latest2 weeks agoUT Judge Drops Bombshell In Charlie Kirk Killer Case
-
News3 weeks agoBiden Attorney Found Dead After It’s Revealed Who She Was Investigating
