Connect with us

Latest

Four of the most controversial television finales in honor of ‘The Boys’ despised ending

Published

on

For those of you who are unaware, the television series “The Boys” ended this week, with a finale that caused a ton of anger and consternation.

I won’t bore you with the details, but fans are basically feeling betrayed after spending so many years watching the show only to have the rug pulled out from under them in the final episode.

If that sounds familiar to you, then you’ve come to the right place, because today, in honor of “The Boys'” lackluster ending, I wanted to look at four more television series that ended on a sour note.

This doesn’t necessarily mean I think the endings to these shows are bad (though that’s true for a couple), but at the time of their release, these respective finales caused a massive amount of backlash.

VARIETY REPORT CLAIMS ‘THE BOYS’ AND ‘HANDMAID’S TALE’ IMAGINARY FASCIST WORLDS ARE BECOMING REALITY

Some have aged more gracefully than others, but all four were slammed by fans and critics alike upon immediate viewing.

Without much further ado, let’s talk some TV!

*Spoilers ahead*

4. How I Met Your Mother (2014)

Let’s start with one that still hasn’t recovered from the contemporary hate it received from its fanbase, as “How I Met Your Mother” and its controversial ending enraged a large portion of its loyal followers.

The problems stem from the fact that the show spends its entire run building up “The Mother” as well as Robin and Barney’s marriage, only to pull the old bait and switch by killing off “The Mother” and having Barney and Robin divorce in the final half hour of the show’s existence.

The final twist of the knife came in the form of Robin and main character Ted ending up together, whom the kids even refer to as “Aunt Robin.”

‘STRANGER THINGS’ FANS REVIEW-BOMB ‘WOKE’ COMING-OUT SCENE IN SHOW’S FINAL SEASON

Gross.

The fans of the show claimed this finale destroyed years of great character building in favor of just “ending up where they started,” since the very first episode opens with the now-iconic “and that, kids, is how I met your mother.”

This will be a theme for another show further down the list, but eschewing your character development to hastily achieve an ending might as well be the kiss of death for any TV show, and HIMYM is no different.

3. Seinfeld (1998)

Since “Seinfeld” is the greatest sitcom of all time (I said what I said), there are almost no flaws in its game, but the series finale is often cited as one of the few blemishes on an otherwise spotless resume.

Jerry, Elaine, George and Kramer nearly die in a plane crash then get arrested for for violating a “Good Samaritan law.”

They then spend the two-part finale on trial while past characters testify about how selfish they are.

On paper, it sounds like the perfect send-off for a “show about nothing” where the characters spent nine seasons never learning their lessons, but many fans felt the premise was too “mean-spirited.”

The finale also gets dinged for being too reliant on past episodes and guest stars, and, at the time, it felt like a lazy end to what many deem the king of all sitcoms.

Public opinion has softened on the matter, and show creator Larry David even came out years later and offered a mea culpa to the disgruntled fanbase.

That coupled with the quasi-Seinfeld reunion during season seven of David’s “Curb Your Enthusiasm” has quelled the angry mob somewhat, but in 1998, the show certainly had its fair share of haters for the way it all ended.

2. The Sopranos (2007)

If “Seinfeld” is considered the greatest sitcom of all time, then “The Sopranos” is likely considered the greatest drama series of all time, and in my opinion, it isn’t particularly close.

After six-ish seasons of batting near 1.000, though, the good times had to come to an end, and leave it to show creator David Chase to not exactly tie things up in a neat little bow for his audience.

‘MIND CHESS,’ NOT THREATS, CONVINCED REAL-LIFE SOPRANOS MOBSTER TO COOPERATE: RETIRED FBI AGENT

With the war between New Jersey and Shah of Iran impersonator Phil Leotardo ending in dramatic fashion, Tony can now breathe a brief sigh of relief, though his crew now looks like a shell of its former self and there are looming indictments hanging over our favorite mob boss’s head.

As we make our way through the final episode of the series, you get the uneasy feeling that something big is about to occur, so when the Soprano family sans Meadow all sit down at Holsteins for a plate of onion rings, viewers felt the tension escalate.

As the dulcet tones of Journey’s “Don’t Stop Believin'” echo through the jukebox, Meadow bursts into the diner as the screen fades to black.

That’s it. End of story. That’s all she wrote.

Viewers were so shocked by this cold ending that many called up HBO or their cable companies to see if maybe something happened to their TVs.

Chase was very intentional with every detail in the series, and the ending was no different, and although this one has aged gracefully a lot like “Seinfeld’s” ending, it was a shocking and ultimately unsatisfying ending for large swathes of the “Sopranos'” fanbase.

It just goes to show that people hate when you cut something off mid sentence and never res…

1. Game of Thrones (2019)

Anyone angered by the finale of “The Boys” must not have been around for the “Game of Thrones” ending, because everything else compared to this HBO fantasy adaptation seems like child’s play when stacked up side-by-side.

While shows like “The Sopranos” and “Seinfeld” angered their respective audiences in their final episodes, “Game of Thrones” spends an entire season pissing all over its fanbase.

NOAH WYLE FACES WOKE FANDOM MELTDOWN OVER PATIENT SAFETY IN ‘THE PITT’ FINALE

The whole premise of “Game of Thrones” centers around political intrigue by way of a real-life chess match taking place across an entire continent, and this was at its best when the writing was strong and the character development was established over multiple seasons.

By the time season eight has run its course, the show has completely trashed all of that character development in favor of subverting expectations and rushing to give the show a “proper ending.”

Characters like Jon Snow and Jaime Lannister, two fan favorites, are reduced to simping idiots, losing all the agency they once had.

The last episode in particular is universally hated by fans thanks to Bran Stark’s reveal as the king after he sat around and did absolutely nothing for the final season.

His powers could have been used in such creative ways but there was no payoff for him becoming the Three-Eyed Raven in the end.

ZERO BS. JUST DAKICH. TAKE THE DON’T @ ME PODCAST ON THE ROAD. DOWNLOAD NOW!

And don’t even get me started on Daenerys, whose turn to the dark side over the last handful of episodes makes Anakin Skywalker’s look subtle by comparison.

I could go on and on, but suffice to say, “Game of Thrones” went from being a cultural phenomenon to a reviled afterthought in the span of just a few short episodes.

It’s almost impressive how the show can take all the goodwill it cultivated over the first seven seasons and flush it down the toilet in just a few hours, and it sits at number one on this list for that very reason.

What is your least favorite series finale? Let me know in the comments down below.

Continue Reading

Latest

MIKE DAVIS: Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the Democrats’ patron saint of human traffick

Published

on

Kilmar Armando Ábrego García, a Salvadoran alleged criminal, blatantly disregarded our laws by entering the United States illegally. He continued to flaunt our laws by engaging in alien smuggling and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling, per an indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Nashville. On Friday, Obama-nominated District Judge Waverly Crenshaw stunningly dismissed the charges on the absurd basis of vindictive prosecution. This ruling is outrageous, and the Trump Justice Department must immediately appeal it to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.

Illegal immigration is always unacceptable. Some illegal immigrants, however, represent the worst of the worst. They do not come here to work, for example, in restaurants to make better lives for their families. Instead, they come here to continue their gang activity, engage in drug trafficking, and terrorize communities. Ábrego García, who laughably has been cast by leftists as a “Maryland father,” represents one of the worst of the worst. Evidence is strong that he is a member of MS-13, a terrorist gang based in Latin America that is responsible for countless acts of barbarity. His wife sought an order of protection against him in light of his alleged domestic abuse. He allegedly smuggled thousands of illegal immigrants into our nation over hundreds of trips. Now, he is free—thanks to another radical Obama judge.

Ábrego García gained notoriety when news emerged that the federal government mistakenly had deported him to El Salvador after an immigration judge had ruled him ineligible to return there due to alleged danger that he faced from gangs. It later came out that Ábrego García allegedly had murdered a rival gang member‘s mother and the gang that supposedly represented a threat to him is no longer viable in El Salvador—because hero President Nayib Bukele, unlike Obama judges, keeps violent gangbangers behind bars. After protracted litigation and negotiations, the government of El Salvador returned Ábrego García to the United States to face federal charges of alien smuggling and conspiracy to commit alien smuggling last year after the Nashville federal grand jury’s indictment.

The indictment alleged that Ábrego García was part of a large human smuggling ring that, among other horrors, was in charge of a tractor-trailer that overturned, killing approximately 50 illegal immigrants on their way to the United States. Coconspirators alleged, among other things, that Ábrego García was abusive to some women who were being smuggled and that he brought firearms and narcotics along with his human cargo. Ábrego García allegedly had no standards for smuggling. He allegedly would transport women and children with members of gangs like MS-13 and other violent groups, showing no regard for the safety of those women or children—or Americans, upon arrival—who became targets of these monsters.

This evidence, however, did not satisfy Obama Judge Crenshaw. He seemed willing to accept that there was sufficient evidence that Ábrego García had engaged in the illegal conduct; however, he waved a magic wand and decided that the prosecution was somehow vindictive. It is rich to see judges now concerned about vindictive prosecutions. Radical D.C. Chief U.S. District Judge Jeb Boasberg, another Obama judge, raised similar issues over the arrest of someone on charges of setting fire in a public park because that individual had burned a U.S. flag. Boasberg believed the Justice Department only might have prosecuted due to the flag burning, even though setting fires in public parks is a federal crime. No judge expressed concerns about vindictive prosecution when President Trump got indicted four times by Democrat prosecutors on novel (and bogus) legal theories, such as the ridiculous claim that a nondisclosure payment to settle a personal matter somehow must be reported for campaign-finance purposes. That case by Alvin Bragg, the hyper-partisan Democrat Manhattan DA, wound up turning into a 34-count felony indictment against something (Trump) who had never been prosecuted by any jurisdiction.

By contrast, the federal government prosecutes human smugglers and those who conspire to smuggle aliens all the time. It is true that, under the Biden administration, immigration enforcement became incredibly lax; indeed, millions of illegal immigrants poured across our then-porous border. Executing his electoral mandate from American voters, President Trump and his all-star administration put an end to that horror show, securing the border with remarkable speed and efficiency. Part of enforcing border security is prosecuting those who attempt to breach it by engaging in alien smuggling. This commonsense concept apparently is too complicated for Obama Judge Crenshaw to grasp. This radical judge has freed Ábrego García from conditions of pretrial release. No longer is this illegal thug in the custody of his brother, nor is he on electronic monitoring. He is free to roam the streets and do what he does best: terrorize innocent Americans.

Since President Trump reassumed office, rogue Democrat district judges—largely appointed by Obama and Biden–have done their level best to thwart his agenda and the will of American voters. The Supreme Court has intervened nearly three dozen times to stop this unconscionable and illegal judicial sabotage. Federal courts of appeals have reigned in these radical Democrat district judges in robes many more dozens of times. The Sixth Circuit must join the list and reverse another rogue ruling by another rogue Obama judge by reinstating the Ábrego García indictment. While the appellate process plays out, the appellate court should issue a stay of Obama Judge Crenshaw’s order so that the conditions of release, especially electronic monitoring, can resume. Despite the Democrats’ canonization efforts, Kilmar Armando Ábrego García is no saint. Ábrego García has proven to be a menace, and courts must treat him accordingly.

CLICK FOR MORE FROM MIKE DAVIS

Continue Reading

Latest

Trump announces highest civilian honor for 9/11 hero remembered as the ‘Man in the Red Bandana’

Published

on

President Donald Trump announced during a rally in New York that he was posthumously awarding the nation’s highest civilian honor to Welles Remy Crowther, the 9/11 hero remembered as the “Man in the Red Bandana” after he repeatedly led victims to safety from the burning South Tower before dying in the terrorist attacks.

Trump revealed the Presidential Medal of Freedom honor during a Rockland County stop on Friday with Rep. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., who had urged the president to recognize Crowther’s heroism ahead of the 25th anniversary of Sept. 11. Crowther, a 24-year-old equities trader who also worked as a volunteer firefighter, became a symbol of American courage after survivors recounted being guided through smoke and wreckage by a man wearing a red bandana over his face.

“At the request of Bruce, and Mike, and some of the political — great political people we have, and we are approaching the 25th anniversary of September 11th, 2001, a dark day that will live in infamy. We are posthumously awarding Welles the Presidential Medal of Freedom,” Trump told the Rockland County crowd, earning a resounding applause.

FOX NATION, TUNNELS TO TOWERS EXPLORES HOW AMERICA’S PASTIME HELPED A GRIEVING NEW YORK HEAL AFTER 9/11

“It’s the highest award outside of the Congressional Medal of Honor — those are the two biggies and Welles has one of them. I just want to congratulate his great mother in doing a phenomenal job in raising that young man. Boy, what bravery, saved those people and became a legend in a sense, nobody else would have done what he did. So he’s going to be getting the Presidential Medal of Freedom.”

The president subsequently brought up Welles’ mother, Alison Crowther, who addressed the pro-Trump crowd momentarily, describing the award bestowed on her son as a “huge honor.” 

“It’s such a beautiful thing that even 25 years later, Welles’ light still shines brightly,” she told the crowd, noting she has traveled the world telling her son’s story to places as far away as Jordan. Alison Crowther remarked that in these travels, when she tells children Welles’ story, “They’re tremendously moved and inspired … to be better people.”

NEW 9/11 MUSEUM EXHIBIT AIMS TO CONNECT YOUNGER AMERICANS TO THE ATTACKS THROUGH POWERFUL ARTIFACTS

Welles, an equities trader who worked on the 104th floor of the South Tower, was in his office when the first aircraft hit the North Tower that morning. He left his mother a voicemail shortly after the towers were struck, letting her know he was okay, but his body was later found amid the rubble.

According to the 9/11 Memorial & Museum, Welles “made three trips to the sky lobby, saving as many people as he could, until the burning building collapsed,” with some reports indicating he saved up to 18 lives that day. As he did so, Welles covered his nose and mouth with a red bandana he kept at his desk.

That red bandana is currently displayed at the 9/11 museum in New York City. The Tunnels to Towers Foundation, a nonprofit that supports first responders and their families, including those who became victims after 9/11, said Welles always kept a red bandana at his desk.

The foundation recounted how, when he was asked why he always carried the red bandana, Welles replied: “With this red bandana, I’m going to change the world.” His father, the foundation said, told Welles to always carry a red bandana on him for “messy jobs.”

“People can live 100 years and not have the compassion, the wherewithal to do what he did,” a survivor rescued by Crowther has said.

Continue Reading

Latest

Way harder than it should be: Why Congress may balk on $1.7B compensation fund

Published

on

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche had never appeared before a congressional panel asking for money to run his department until Tuesday morning.

And even though cabinet secretaries routinely make their budget requests to Congress, it appears that Blanche apparently didn’t even need to ask lawmakers for the most-controversial batch of federal funds in years. 

It was already approved. Somehow. 

Blanche’s Justice Department announced the creation of a billion compensation fund to pay people who Republicans say are victims of government weaponization. Who gets the money isn’t clear. And what’s murkier still is how the stash of cash came about.

APOLOGIES AND CASH HEADED TO ALLEGED ‘WEAPONIZATION’ VICTIMS IN BILLION-DOLLAR TRUMP SETTLEMENT

In short, President Donald Trump sued his own IRS for leaking his tax returns – along with the filings of several hundred other Americans. Then, Blanche’s own Department of Justice announced that the president essentially settled with himself. 

“Per the settlement, plaintiffs will receive a formal apology but no monetary payment or damages of any kind. They have agreed, in exchange for the creation of this fund, to drop their pending lawsuit with prejudice, and also withdraw two administrative claims, including for damages resulting from the unlawful raid of Mar-a-Lago and the Russia-collusion hoax,” read the DoJ statement.

The fund is worth $1.776 billion. Get it? 1776.

REPUBLICANS RECOIL AS TRUMP’S BILLION-DOLLAR DOJ ‘SLUSH FUND’ FOR ALLIES THREATENS ICE, BORDER PATROL PLAN

So while the president couldn’t receive money from this fund, his political allies and donors could.

All without congressional input. 

“I realize it’s a lot of money,” said Sen. John Kennedy, R-La. “I want to understand where the money comes from. Do we find it in the budget? Do we have to borrow it? There’s just a lot of unanswered questions.”

DAVID MARCUS: HE BARELY SURVIVED BIDEN LAWFARE, AND NOW HE DESERVES TO GET PAID

“What I want to know is how the fund is created and what its purpose is,” said Sen. Jerry Moran, R-Kan.

“And (I want to know) the legality of creating a fund that Congress hasn’t had anything to say about.” 

The government swept up the phone information of multiple Republican lawmakers after the January 6 riot as part of Operation Arctic Frost. That included the records of Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn. He defended the fund.

‘COMPLETE FAILURE’: GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN CRISIS THREATENS CAPITOL HILL AS TRUMP PLANS POLICY OVERHAUL 

“What we ought to be talking about is the reasons for the compensation. Weaponization of government that took place under former President Joe Biden was an absolute disgrace,” said Hagerty.

Blanche formerly served as President Trump’s personal legal counsel. Lawmakers argued that Blanche reverted to that role when he created the compensation fund out of the ether. 

“Mr. Attorney General, you are acting today like the president’s personal attorney. And that’s the whole problem,” said Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.

CONGRESSIONAL REPUBLICANS FACE BRUISING BATTLE TO AVOID GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN

“You’re a very gifted lawyer. But from my perspective, you have very little faith to the Constitution and the people of America. And you’re the president’s consigliere,” piled on Sen. Jack Reed D-R.I.

Lawmakers questioned who qualifies for compensation.

“Will individuals who assaulted Capitol Hill police officers be eligible for this fund?” asked Van Hollen.

DEMS DEMAND TRUMP RESUME CASH FLOW AS THEY FINALLY GET LEVERAGE IN RACE TO PREVENT SHUTDOWN

Anybody in this country is eligible to apply if they believe they are a victim of weaponization,” replied Blanche.

And that’s what concerned bipartisan lawmakers. The compensation conundrum instantly spilled over into a major bill, due to the hit the Senate floor. 

Congressional Republicans were trying to pass a bill to finally address funding for ICE and Border Patrol, once and for all. But they planned to bypass a Democratic filibuster using a special process called budget reconciliation.

SENATE GOP LAUNCHES ALL-NIGHT VOTE-A-RAMA TO FUND ICE, BORDER PATROL THROUGH END OF TRUMP’S TERM

The good thing about reconciliation is that you can pass a bill with 51 yeas and don’t need to clear the filibuster with 60 votes. The bad thing is that the reconciliation process entails what the Senate refers to as a “vote-a-rama.” This is where senators can offer practically any amendment on any subject in a drawn-out process which might consume an entire calendar day.

Republicans freaked out that Democrats would force them to take controversial votes on the compensation fund. And frankly, many Republicans intended to author their own amendments to curb the fund – simultaneously inoculating themselves from blowback. 

That political brew was too much for Senate Republicans.

DEMOCRATS’ LAST-MINUTE MOVE TO BLOCK GOP FUNDING PLAN SENDS LAWMAKERS HOME EARLY

They summoned Blanche to Capitol Hill Thursday morning to explain the fund. The meeting didn’t go well. Fox is told that Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Tom Cotton, R-Ark., were pointed in their comments to Blanche. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., popped into the Capitol’s Ohio Clock Corridor en route to the meeting. Tillis was in mid-conversation. All anyone could hear Tillis say was “And I’m not voting for it!” as he walked by.

By early afternoon, Republican leaders scrapped the bill to fund Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and sent everyone home for Memorial Day. It was the biggest legislative rebuke of President Trump’s second term.

 “I just don’t know how this puppy dog will work,” said Kennedy. “I think there were six or seven people who are going to vote no.”

SENATE REPUBLICANS RACE TO FUND ICE, CBP WITHOUT DEMOCRATS AS SHUTDOWN DRAGS

Yet Republicans were practically on the verge of finally ending the ICE and Border Patrol funding impasse.

“The sole reason we are here today is because Democrats refused to fund law enforcement at the Department of Homeland Security,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D.

The debate over funding for the president’s ballroom wasn’t exactly the foxtrot for Senate Republicans. But the compensation fund converted the reconciliation process into the samba.

CONGRESS MELTS DOWN: MEMBERS UNLEASH PERSONAL ATTACKS AFTER WEEKS OF SHUTDOWN DRAMA

No fancy footwork here. Republicans managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

“There are a lot of questions about it. I have Republican colleagues who have concerns about who can receive funding from that fund,” said Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind.

However Banks noted that “every single Republican who was on the ballot like I was in the ‘24 cycle talked about stopping the weaponization of government.”

HOUSE GOP TENSIONS ERUPT AS REPUBLICANS TURN ON EACH OTHER HEADING INTO YEAR’S END

Democrats watched as Republicans blanched at what Blanche told them. 

“I think my Republican colleagues have reached their limit,” said Sen. Peter Welch, D-Vt.

Thune said the compensation fund “makes everything way harder than it should be.” He declared that the White House should should have “consulted” with Congressional Republicans about the fund ahead of time. So deadlocked, Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., dismissed everyone until early June.

OUT OF POWER: DEMOCRATS DISORIENTED IN FIGHT AGAINST TRUMP AGENDA

“Republicans are so divided, so dysfunctional, so disorganized, that they are fleeing Washington. Their majority can’t melt down fast enough,” said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

However, some of the President’s allies defended the compensation fund

“I feel comfortable that whose who have been wronged by their government should have some sort of redress,” said Sen. Eric Schmidt, R-Mo.

And even though the president recently steamrolled some GOP foes politically, Republicans blocked him legislatively.

“We should have full review of what we’re funding,” said Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont. “Congress has our obligation.”

So President Trump may get the personnel he wants in Congress next year as Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., and Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., go by the wayside. But securing the policies may need to wait until the president’s preferred candidates are in place in 2027.

That’s why some lawmakers are questioning whether Congress can move any more meaningful legislation the rest of this year. Everything else from here on will be “way harder than it should be.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal