Connect with us

Latest

Olympians react to the IOC’s policy change to protect women’s sports

Published

on

It was a day of Olympic history

After the International Olympic Committee updated its policies to prevent biological males from competing in women’s sports, multiple Olympians have come forward to give their reactions to the change. 

Several Olympians, including gold medalists, have shared their thoughts on the new policy with Fox News Digital. 

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

“Today is a great day for women’s sports, and a big win in the Olympic world. By implementing the sex testing, it will allow for fair competition. It used to happen years ago, and by bringing it back it will protect the women’s category. I think it’s very fitting that LA28 will be the games to protect women’s sports, as it’s something that our president has advocated for,” Humphries told Fox News Digital. 

“With the election of Christie Coventry and Olympic Champion and her decision to appoint another woman to lead the medical commission. It was informative that the IOC decided to go outside to reach researchers to base this opinion on science and fairness. And it’s the right decision,” de Varona told Fox News Digital. 

“Really science and research is how this decision was based. I mean, I basically think everyone should have an opportunity in sport but in the Olympic arena, it’s a zero-sum game.” 

“The best news! About time!” Skinner told Fox News Digital.

“This is huge for women’s sport. For years, female athletes have asked for clarity, consistency, and fairness in competition. Not politics. Not ambiguity. Just clear standards that protect the integrity of the category we train our entire lives to compete in. Sport only works when rules are applied consistently and athletes can trust them,” Uhlaender told Fox News Digital. 

“Progress doesn’t come from avoiding hard conversations, it comes from addressing them with courage. Thank you to everyone who helped to make this happen, who protected women’s sport.”

“This is a long-overdue return to common sense, and the IOC deserves credit for taking a clear stand. At the elite level, fairness matters—and protecting the women’s category based on biological reality is essential to preserving it,” Clary told Fox News Digital. 

“As an Olympian, I didn’t dedicate my life to competing on a manipulated playing field—one tilted and disguised as inclusion. Women’s sport exists because biological differences matter—strength, power, and muscle developed through male puberty aren’t erased, and pretending otherwise erases us. Fairness isn’t controversial. Let little girls dream of gold — not allow those dreams to be lost or tarnished.”

“Better late than never. This decision by the IOC is a big step in the right direction. After all, it has long been known that one cannot change one’s sex, and if someone was born a man, then even if they start wearing women’s clothing, they will still remain a man. Besides, there are significant differences between the two sexes in terms of strength and speed, which puts female athletes at a disadvantage right from the start,”Czyzowicz told Fox News Digital. 

“So, it is absolutely clear that it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category. In addition, in some sports it would simply not be safe.I believe this decision protects women’s sports, specifically by preventing transgender athletes from competing against biological women.”

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CELEBRATES PROGRESS AFTER A YEAR OF TRUMP ADMIN’S FIGHT TO SAVE WOMEN’S SPORTS

“If men are allowed to compete in women’s sports, in time, women will be erased from ever having opportunities to even compete at the Olympic level.  You will have two categories in the Olympics. DSD/trans and the men’s category.  Sex testing worked very well and was non-intrusive.  A simple buccal cheek swab once in your lifetime,” Thompson told Fox News Digital. 

“Playing sport is a human right. Today’s IOC announcement affirms that principle of inclusion and diversity. All athletes are to compete in their category; their weight, age, ability category, and now, their sex category. On behalf of women in sport, thank you for your leadership, IOC,” Hogshead said in a statement. 

“Welcome news today from the IOC. People who adopt different gender identities, such as transgender, gender non-conforming, or others should be afforded the same human rights as other citizens and protected from discrimination, so long as no sex-based rights are compromised,” Navratilova said in a statement.

“It’s what the gay, lesbian, and bisexual community fought for over decades. Today’s IOC decision recognizes that in Olympic sports, sex matters, and women’s sex-based rights must take precedence over gender-based identities.”

“There really is little to be lauded over the IOC’s woefully slow decision. It should have always been a most simple and basic logical conclusion that is unequivocally founded in God’s design of male and female,” Massie told Fox News Digital. 

“Our female Olympic and Paralympic athletes work too hard to have their dreams of achievement under-minded by a man’s self deception of reality. Sadly, the battlegrounds remain extensive amongst the grassroots and recreational sporting arenas and those must continue to be contested for the sake of young ladies everywhere, now and into the future.”

“Finally, the International Olympic Committee showed some balls and chose fairness over fear. As an Olympian, I didn’t dedicate my life to competing on a manipulated playing field—one tilted and disguised as inclusion,” Zimmerman told Fox News Digital.

“Women’s sport exists because biological differences matter—strength, power, and muscle developed through male puberty aren’t erased, and pretending otherwise erases us. Fairness isn’t controversial. Let little girls dream of gold — not allow those dreams to be lost or tarnished.”

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Continue Reading

Latest

From courts, critics and his own party, Donald Trump runs smack into reality

Published

on

President Trump hasn’t had a great week. I don’t think anyone can argue with that.

The man who has so utterly dominated the Republican Party has been forced to backtrack or reverse himself, in part because of on-the-record outrage by GOP lawmakers.

That involved his plan to create a $1.8-billion “anti-weaponization” fund, with most of it going to Jan. 6 rioters, who he calls patriots. The idea of rewarding people who attacked police officers, took over members’ quarters and chanted “Hang Mike Pence!” touched a very deep nerve (among the public as well).

When leaders of his own party, who usually roll over and play dead, started denouncing what some of them called a slush fund, Trump knew he had a loser on his hands and yesterday tried to cut his losses: He has officially killed the funding scheme. 

This, of course, grew out of his suit against the IRS, where Trump was definitely wronged by the leaking of his tax returns, but as president was “negotiating” with his subordinates.

Then there are the courts, where even the Supreme Court has not escaped Trump’s wrath on decisions he dislikes, such as striking down his unilateral global tariffs. He called out justices by name, branding them “fools and lapdogs,” a “disgrace” and an “embarrassment.”

Which brings us to the Kennedy Center fiasco.

A federal judge ordered that Trump’s name be removed from the glittering marble portico overlooking the Potomac River that had just been the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. The judge temporarily blocked the two-year shutdown planned to begin this summer.

The president posted that unless he was in charge, he had “no interest in continuing what could only be a hopeless journey,” suggesting he would turn it over to Congress.

“Unfortunately, Judge Cooper and the Radical Left would rather see it DIE than have President Trump transform it into something that everyone could be proud of, much as I have done, in many cases, throughout my life,” he wrote.

Judge Christopher Cooper, setting a two-week deadline, said Trump’s renaming violated a 1964 law that made it “crystal clear” the institution was to be named for the assassinated president and that only Congress can change it.

I happen to think the center could remain open while partial refurbishing takes place, but of course no shows are booked at the moment.

The larger pattern is that many judges no longer trust the administration’s lawyers.

“Their missteps in court come as the department’s leadership takes an unusually combative tone with judges who rule against them,” The New York Times says.

A Trump Justice Department spokesperson said: “Any attack on the professionalism or integrity of DOJ attorneys is outrageous and unjustified.”

Finally, there is the court of public opinion for Trump, who turns 80 next month.

A lot of folks are upset about the design of the $250 bill featuring Trump’s visage. I don’t worry about that because I don’t plan on buying anything with a $250 note, but it hasn’t gone down well.

I don’t believe many people are wild about the surprise demolition of the East Wing, plans for a 250-foot arch, or the obsession with building a White House ballroom. That was originally going to be paid for by private donations, but now Congress wants to appropriate $1 billion in taxpayer dollars — kind of bait and switch.

The Iran War, whose settlement “talks” have been blown up by mutual attacks, is increasingly unpopular. A PBS/Marist poll last month found that 60 percent of those questioned disapprove of the war and overall are frustrated by soaring food and gas costs.

RELATED: TRUMP INSISTS IRAN TALKS ARE ON, SAYING DEAL IS ‘NOT A SIMPLE THING’

As for the July 4 celebration, so many musicians, including Milli Vanilli, Flo Rida and Young MC, dropped out that the president canceled the concert and will turn it into a MAGA rally featuring … him.

Look, Donald Trump has always been at the center of his own narrative. He’s a born performer, dating back to “The Apprentice” days.

RELATED: TRUMP REVEALS NEW WHCA DINNER VENUE AFTER SHOOTING CHAOS DERAILED GALA

I’ve interviewed Trump numerous times, and he can sit for an hour and rattle off answers on a vast array of subjects, including stuff from 40 years ago. So any talk that he’s on the verge of dementia is utter BS by uninformed critics. But he does seem less sure-footed right now.

Physically, the worst you can say about Trump is that he’s got swollen ankles and sometimes closes his eyes in meetings.

Trump is full speed ahead — that’s what he knows. Where he comes off as angry and overheated is in the barrage of late-night and early-morning Truth Social posts in which he rails against his opponents.

Hey, you don’t really expect an 80-year-old man to change, do you?

Continue Reading

Latest

Hilton, Becerra, in the lead with votes still being counted in battle for California governor

Published

on

HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA – Republican Steve Hilton and Democrat Xavier Becerra were leading in unofficial early returns Wednesday morning and appeared positioned to advance to the November California gubernatorial election in the race to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom in steering the nation’s most populous state and one of the world’s largest economies.

Hilton, a one-time British political strategist turned American conservative commentator and former Fox News Channel host who is backed by President Donald Trump, and Becerra, a former California attorney general who later served as a Cabinet secretary in former President Biden’s administration, were in the lead early Wednesday morning, with votes still being counted and results not yet certified.

“Change is coming to California, and it’s long overdue,” Hilton told supporters at his primary night watch party in Orange County.

Hilton, in an exclusive Fox News Digital interview following his speech, said speaking “honest, simple truths” to voters boosted his campaign. “Everything is too expensive in California. We’re going to cut people’s costs,” he pledged.

CLICK HERE FOR THE LATEST PRIMARY RESULTS FROM FOX NEWS 

Becerra, who, if elected in November, would make history as California’s first Latino governor since Romualdo Pacheco briefly served in 1875, told supporters that his campaign’s success is “more than a Hollywood ending. More than a milestone. That’s the everyday miracle of living in a state that makes the improbable seem inevitable. And I couldn’t have done it without you.”

Democrat-dominated California holds what’s known as a jungle primary in which all candidates, regardless of party affiliation, appear on the same ballot, with the top two finishers advancing to the general election.

Tom Steyer, a billionaire hedge fund founder turned environmental activist who unsuccessfully ran for his party’s 2020 presidential nomination and who has shelled out over $200 million of his own money in his bid for governor, was in third place as the results continued to be tabulated and as additional mail and provisional ballots remained to be counted.

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican, as well as Democratic candidates former Democratic Rep. Katie Porter, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan, former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond, were also among the whopping 61 candidates on the ballot.

Hilton is hoping to become the first California Republican to win a gubernatorial election since then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 2006 re-election.

In his speech, Hilton showed off the lining of his blazer, with American and California flags, that he said Schwarzenegger a few years ago urged him to wear. “Arnold, I did that for you,” Hilton said.

DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB

Former Vice President Kamala Harris and Sen. Alex Padilla mulled launching Democratic bids for governor, but both last year announced they would take a pass. That resulted in the lack of a clear Golden State gubernatorial frontrunner for the first time in more than a quarter-century.

And the race was overshadowed for much of last year, as the devastation from the Los Angeles-area wildfires and President Donald Trump’s immigration raids grabbed headlines in California.

But the showdown for governor entered the spotlight earlier this year when one of the leading candidates, Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell, dropped out of the race and then resigned from Congress after facing multiple allegations of sexual assault and misconduct that he continues to deny.

Swalwell’s exit from the race opened the door for first Steyer and then Becerra to rise in the polls.

Steyer, who unsuccessfully ran for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, spent more than $200 million of his own money to blanket the airwaves and the internet with ads. Meanwhile, more than $80 million in outside money has also been spent on the race.

Bianco, who launched his campaign for governor in April of last year, was among the top contenders in the race until Trump’s endorsement of Hilton in early April appeared to blunt his momentum.

Continue Reading

Latest

South Dakota governors race remains up in the air as GOP contest goes to runoff

Published

on

Gov. Larry Rhoden is projected to survive an upset attempt by popular Rep. Dusty Johnson in South Dakota’s crowded GOP gubernatorial primary Tuesday.
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal