Connect with us

Latest

Rai does it his way to win PGA, pointless Aronimink criticism, player grades and an important message

Published

on

The 2026 PGA Championship was a game of patience and precision. In an era where picking apart golf courses, even major championship ones, with a flavor of violence has become the expectation, there was a welcome shock factor seeing a someone like Aaron Rai emerge from the pack of certified killers to get his hands on the Wanamaker Trophy.

Rai was an unexpected winner. Even halfway through the final round at Aronimink Golf Club, when nobody else in the field was able to get a hand on the door to slam it shut, the Englishman stepped up and did so with authority. Classy, tasteful, and respectful authority, but authority nonetheless.

The golf course itself and the setup took criticism from both fans and players throughout the week, and while the debates back and forth are woven into the rhetoric of every major championship, it felt pointless at Aronimink. We’ll explain why down below.

With such a jam-packed leaderboard and so many big-name players in contention over the weekend, player grades are in order. Spoiler: Ludvig Aberg’s grade is putrid.

This is Par Talk, a weekly read to get you caught up on all the happenings that took place in professional golf that you need to know. You can follow Mark on X @itismarkharris and email him at [email protected]

The 2026 PGA Championship was expected to be a test that favored long hitters with the bomb and gauge strategy to be deployed by everyone who has it in their bag. While longer hitters, including the likes of Jon Rahm, Rory McIlroy, Ludvig Aberg, and Justin Thomas, were in the mix come late Sunday afternoon, Rai reminded the world that hitting fairways and greens, and letting a scorching-hot putter go to work, can still get the job done just about anywhere.

Rai entered the week ranked 160th on the PGA Tour in average driving distance and finished the week ranked 66th in driving distance among the 82 players who made the cut. He was forced to slowly carve up Aronimink instead of aggressively picking it apart, and he did so better than anyone else in the field.

The Englishman closed out the week ranked second in strokes gained: approach, fourth in driving accuracy, hit 74% of his greens in regulation, and led the entire field with 22 birdies or better.

While Rai’s 70-foot birdie putt on the 17th hole will understandably garner tons of attention for days to come, his birdie on the drivable par-4 13th hole was, up to this point, the defining moment of his career.

After driving it into a greenside bunker, Rai was left with a 40-yard shot that most players holding a one-shot lead would play with extreme caution. He chose to be aggressive, however, and fly his golf ball onto a shelf where disaster was lurking, yet walked off the green with a birdie and a two-shot advantage.

Rai played his final 10 holes in six-under par before signing for a final-round 65, his lowest score in a major championship by two strokes.

The 31-year-old is known as being among the nicest and most humble players in professional golf, but inside the ropes on Sunday, he was as mean as they come. With his victory, Rai became the first Englishman to hoist the Wanamaker Trophy since Jim Barnes won the original tournament back in 1919.

Maybe we see Rai back in contention at a major championship soon; maybe he never sees the first page of a major leaderboard again. Regardless of what the future holds, he seized the moment at Aronimink on a Sunday in May and entered golf’s history book.

The media — both those watching from home and those with boots on the ground — could not have been more wrong about expectations of how the golf course was going to play throughout the week than they were at Aronimink.

That is not an indictment of anyone, either. I think it’s more of a reflection of how our default setting has become “the long hitters will climb to the top, separate themselves, and scores will be shockingly low.”

I predicted the winning score to be 17-under myself, and thought that was on the more conservative side, so Rai’s 9-under total was a surprise, and a pleasant one at that.

With scores being on the high side and the leaderboard remaining extremely crowded at the top — there were 21 players within four of the lead heading into Sunday — the discourse began that the setup of the golf course was poor.

Shane Lowry, who was never in contention, said the course “has been set up pretty poorly” after the third round. Rory McIlroy explained that the lack of separation on the leaderboard is typically “a sign of not a great setup.” Scottie Scheffler said that he had never seen tougher pin locations in his entire career.

On the flip side of that coin, you have fans at home, enjoying seeing the best players in the world struggle to make birdies on a golf course that played just over 7,100 yards each of the final two rounds.

Without getting too into the weeds, I think the overall consensus of the situation is straightforward.

It’s not the responsibility of golf fans to worry about whether the players love or hate a golf course setup. Most fans seemed to enjoy Aronimink because it is entertaining to see the best players look confused on a golf course. In that same light, McIlroy, Lowry, or any other player is absolutely entitled to share their opinions of a setup, and outside of an egregious statement, shouldn’t take flak. They’re the ones playing the golf course with millions of dollars on the line.

This leads us to a PSA: It is totally acceptable to say you enjoyed this year’s PGA Championship. It was quirky and fun. It resembled a typical U.S. Open more than a typical PGA and it was enjoyable seeing an old Donald Ross track baffle players. And most importantly, it was a great test.

We’re constantly screaming for the best players to be tested more often, and just because it came at a PGA Championship that most expected to be a birdie fest doesn’t mean it should be disparaged.

Aaron Rai: He won the golf tournament…by three. A+

Jon Rahm: Nobody knew what version of Rahm we’d get at Aronimink entering the week. After a T-38 finish at the Masters and with his future in golf up in the air as the Saudis pull funding from LIV Golf, the Spaniard could have no-showed and pouted while doing so. Instead, he had a noticeably good attitude throughout the week and finished T-2 after a 67-68 weekend.

He did leave a couple of shots out there on Sunday, however, and still carries incredibly high expectations. B

JON RAHM APOLOGIZES AFTER HITTING VOLUNTEER WITH FLYING DIVOT AT PGA CHAMPIONSHIP: ‘INEXCUSABLE’

Ludvig Aberg: His final round 69 may as well have been a 79. After essentially going through the motions in his opening nine holes yet still being firmly in contention, a three-putt from 34-feet on the 10th hole ended his day while serving as a great representation for Aberg these days.

He has every physical tool to be in the conversation as the best player in the world, but it’s clear that between the ears, he’s battling and losing. It feels like he’s struggling to find the balance of caring too much and caring too little. He also needs to throw the blade putter into an inferno and start putting with a mallet. C-, even if he did finish T-4.

Alex Smalley: When you grab a two-shot lead after 54 holes at a major championship, you’re doing a lot of things right. His Sunday played out as expected with nervy shots early on and the dreaded double bogey coming at the sixth, but he hung in there a lot better than most predicted, myself included, to begin the day.

ALEX SMALLEY’S MOM GARNERS A TON OF ATTENTION AFTER HER SON GRABS SURPRISE LEAD AT THE PGA CHAMPIONSHIP

Shooting even par in the final round wasn’t enough to get it done, but he probably would have taken that score to begin the day. A- to go along with his T-2 finish.

Cameron Smith: He’s back (maybe, hopefully). Oh, how I missed watching Cam Smith stand over any putt on the property and thinking he’s going to drain it. After six consecutive missed cuts in majors, it was a ton of fun seeing the Aussie back in the mix and finishing T-7. If he gets the driver figured out, he could turn into a factor sooner rather than later again at majors. A-

Rory McIlroy: McIlroy could have packed it in after shooting four-over in the opening round, but instead answered back with rounds of 67-66-69. The one knock against McIlroy, and I believe a justified one, was that he brought exactly zero juice to the course on Sunday. It happens, but not too often on a major championship Sunday when beginning the round just three shots back of the lead. The game was good, nowhere close to great. Two birdies on Sunday, pars on both Par 5s, and a bogey on a 299-yard Par 4. A T-7 finish gets a C+ all things considered.

Scottie Scheffler: From tee to green, Scheffler played well enough to win the golf tournament, but when he stepped on the green, he looked nothing like the No. 1 player in the world. For the week, he finished 72nd out of 82 players who made the cut in strokes gained: putting. A very forgettable T-14. C

Continue Reading

Culture

Cracker Barrel Fans Outraged Again After NEW Major Change

Published

on

Cracker Barrel Fans Outraged Again  After NEW Major Change

Cracker Barrel built its reputation on comfort food, Southern tradition, and a menu customers could count on for decades.

That’s exactly why loyal diners are still fuming as the restaurant chain continues removing many of the classic dishes that helped make it a household name.

For years, customers have pleaded with the Tennessee-based chain to restore fan favorites that quietly disappeared from the menu, including black-eyed peas, fried haddock, red-eye gravy, fried chicken livers, and perhaps the most mourned item of all—the Sunrise Sampler.

For many longtime patrons, the Sunrise Sampler wasn’t just another breakfast. It was the breakfast.

The hearty platter came loaded with eggs, grits, fried apples, hash brown casserole, sausage, bacon, country ham, and biscuits with gravy—giving diners a taste of nearly everything Cracker Barrel had to offer without having to piece together a meal item by item.

“I noticed a while back that Cracker Barrel removed the GOAT of all breakfasts, the Sunrise Sampler, from the menu,” Josh Cooper, owner of Cooper’s Next Level BBQ in Tallahassee, Florida, told Fox News Digital. “You used to get a little bit of everything without breaking the bank.”

The meal hasn’t completely disappeared—but recreating it now comes with a catch.

Customers must order every component separately, turning what was once an affordable breakfast favorite into a considerably more expensive order.

“Now, in order to get that same teaser touch from the Sunrise Sampler, you have to order it all à la carte, which costs around $25 for the same great meal,” he said. “Blasphemy!”

Fox News Digital reached out to Cracker Barrel for comment.

The growing frustration over disappearing menu items comes after the company already faced a wave of backlash for attempting to modernize its image.

Last year, Cracker Barrel sparked outrage among longtime customers after unveiling a redesigned logo and updated restaurant interiors that many believed stripped away the rustic charm that had long defined the brand.

The changes were part of a sweeping $700 million overhaul across more than 660 locations, including menu revisions and a cleaner, less cluttered dining room design.

The company ultimately reversed course following widespread criticism, but many loyal customers say the damage had already been done.

The leadership shakeup continued last week when Cracker Barrel announced that CEO Julie Masino will step down on Aug. 10.

Former Bloomin’ Brands CEO David Deno is slated to take over.

For many customers, however, the issue extends far beyond a logo or a fresh coat of paint.

They believe corporate leadership has steadily chipped away at the very traditions that made Cracker Barrel stand apart from countless other restaurant chains.

Cooper said companies often underestimate the emotional attachment customers have to longtime menu favorites.

People are “asking for comfort and nostalgia.”

“The reality is that nostalgia matters. And when you remove popular items without controlling the narrative or managing customers’ expectations, you are bound to have upset patrons,” he said.

“Whether it’s due to rising food costs, kitchen timing or any other reason, it’s important to communicate with the people who put you on the map in the first place. Communication matters.”

Rachel Love, a self-described Cracker Barrel enthusiast from Tennessee, said one discontinued favorite remains at the top of her wish list.

“I absolutely loved the black-eyed peas, and I’m so glad they’re getting some attention,” Love told Fox News Digital. “They were one of my favorite sides and always felt like such a classic part of the Cracker Barrel experience.”

Love also hopes the restaurant revives its baked apple dumpling, describing it as “the perfect comfort dessert” for a brand built on old-fashioned hospitality.

To her, the debate is about much more than a handful of discontinued recipes.

“People aren’t just asking for old menu items — they’re asking for the comfort and nostalgia that came with them,” she said.

“Sometimes bringing back one classic dish means more to loyal customers than introducing several new ones.”

That may be the lesson Cracker Barrel continues to learn the hard way.

Customers aren’t asking the chain to reinvent itself.

They’re asking it to remember what made it successful.

They want the front porch.

They want the country store.

They want the breakfasts, the classic sides, and the timeless comfort food that turned Cracker Barrel into an American institution.

For many loyal diners, nostalgia isn’t a weakness.

It’s the brand.

Continue Reading

Latest

Mamdani Kicked Out — He’s Livid After Latest Announcement

Published

on

Mamdani Kicked Out — He’s Livid After Latest Announcement

Backlash against New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani continues to mount, with the Democratic Socialist facing another public rebuke after reportedly being denied the opportunity to speak at the funeral of a U.S. Army soldier killed during an Iranian missile attack.

According to multiple reports, Mamdani attended Friday’s funeral for Army Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad in Queens but remained silent throughout the service after the soldier’s family reportedly chose not to have him address mourners.

Rampersad was one of three American service members killed in Jordan during an Iranian attack on July 17.

The funeral was held at a church in Ozone Park, where elected officials, community leaders, family members and fellow mourners gathered to honor the 28-year-old soldier’s sacrifice.

According to the New York Post, Mamdani appeared to review prepared remarks on an iPad while other dignitaries spoke, but his name was never called.

A source familiar with the funeral told The Post the decision came directly from Rampersad’s family, which reportedly wanted to keep politics out of the ceremony.

The family chose not to have Mayor Zohran Mamdani speak in an effort to avoid what the source described as “political distractions.”

After the funeral concluded, the mayor’s office released the remarks Mamdani had planned to deliver.

“It is often said that our fallen ‘gave their tomorrows for our today,’” Mamdani planned to say.

“Sergeant Rampersad had tomorrows waiting for her: birthdays, ordinary mornings, evenings spent with her loved ones,” his remarks continued.

“But she gave every one of them up so that we could have ours — so that we could stand here today, safe and protected,” he was to say.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, however, did address those gathered and offered an emotional tribute to the fallen soldier.

“I feel after reading and admiring this woman from a distance, I feel like she could be one of my daughters,” Hochul said.

Other speakers included Ozone Park Residents Block Association President Sam Esposito, state Sen. Joseph Addabbo Jr., and Queens Borough President Donovan Richards.

According to the Department of War, Sgt. Angel Sarah Rampersad, 28, of Ozone Park, New York, was killed in action during an enemy attack at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.

U.S. Central Command said Rampersad and two fellow service members were killed while American and coalition forces defended against Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks.

The other fallen Americans were identified as 1st Lt. Tyler James Feehan, 25, of Ewa Beach, Hawaii, and Pvt. Isabella Gonzales, 19, of Carrollton, Texas.

All three were deployed to Jordan in support of Operation Inherent Resolve, the international mission to combat ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

Rampersad served with the 1st Battalion, 57th Air Defense Artillery Regiment, 52d Air Defense Artillery Brigade, 10th Army Air and Missile Defense Command in Ansbach, Germany.

She worked as a 25U Signal Operations Support Specialist, according to the Department of War.

One person who attended the funeral told the newspaper the mayor appeared visibly upset after realizing he would not be invited to speak.

“He looked over at his staff, frustrated and seemed angry that he didn’t speak,” the source told the Post.

The attendee said Mamdani eventually understood that his name would not be called, glanced toward members of his staff, and put away the tablet that reportedly contained his prepared remarks.

Another source cited by the newspaper said the decision reflected the wishes of Rampersad’s family, describing them as politically conservative and supportive of President Donald Trump.

“The family is more conservative and wanted to limit any political distractions,” the source told the Post.

Neither Mamdani’s office nor members of the Rampersad family have publicly confirmed the account explaining why the mayor was not invited to speak.

Although he never addressed the congregation during the service, the mayor’s office later publicly released the remarks he had prepared, bringing attention to a moment that underscored the growing political controversy surrounding New York City’s new mayor.

Continue Reading

Latest

GOP Just Passed It 232-288 — Pelosi And AOC Lose It On House Floor

Published

on

GOP Just Passed It 232-288 — Pelosi And AOC Lose It On House Floor

The House of Representatives delivered a major victory this week for Americans with disabilities who want the opportunity to work instead of being trapped by a broken federal bureaucracy.

In a bipartisan vote, lawmakers approved legislation aimed at dismantling long-standing barriers within the Social Security Disability Insurance program that critics say have discouraged work and punished self-sufficiency for decades.

H.R. 8884, the **Removing Barriers to Work for Disabled Americans Act**, sponsored by Rep. Austin Scott, R-Ga., passed the House by a vote of 232-188 and now heads to the Senate, where it has been referred to the Committee on Finance.

The legislation restores an important tool that the Social Security Administration lost when its demonstration authority expired in 2022.

Under the bill, the SSA would once again be authorized to test practical reforms under the Social Security Disability Insurance program through Dec. 31, 2030, with demonstration projects continuing through the end of 2031.

Rather than permanently rewriting federal law, the agency would be able to pilot innovative approaches designed to help beneficiaries who are able and willing return to the workforce.

The legislation includes significant safeguards. Participation would be entirely voluntary, and no participant could receive less total income as a result of joining one of the demonstration projects.

Supporters say those protections make the bill a common-sense effort to modernize a system that has too often discouraged Americans from pursuing employment.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., argued the current system is failing many of the very people it was designed to help.

“With over 60 percent of Social Security Disability Insurance recipients expressing an interest in returning to the workforce but less than one percent leaving the program because of a successful return to work each year, the Social Security Administration’s complex rules and regulations are clearly failing to deliver for too many Americans,” Smith said.

“Giving the SSA the authority to test innovative ways to better help disabled Americans pursue gainful employment is pure common sense, and this legislation goes a step further to ensure participation in any new system is both voluntary and will not reduce a beneficiary’s total income,” Smith added.

Smith pointed to what he described as a massive disconnect between Americans who want to work and those who are actually able to do so under the current system.

For years, disability recipients have warned that attempting to return to work can trigger a maze of complicated regulations, overpayment disputes, benefit cliffs, and uncertainty that ultimately makes taking a job financially risky.

Rather than encouraging independence, critics say the current structure often rewards staying on the sidelines.

Supporters argue H.R. 8884 takes a fundamentally different approach.

Instead of expanding government programs or imposing sweeping permanent reforms without evidence, the legislation gives the Social Security Administration the flexibility to test targeted solutions, evaluate the results, and determine what actually helps Americans reenter the workforce before making lasting policy changes.

Backers say the measure reflects a core conservative principle: government assistance should serve as a bridge to opportunity—not a permanent barrier to self-reliance.

The bill recognizes that having a disability does not automatically mean someone is unable to work and that federal policy should encourage those who are capable of seeking employment rather than penalizing them for trying.

The legislation also broadens the agency’s authority to include additional populations, including blind Americans, expanding the reach of future demonstration projects.

The proposal advanced through the House with bipartisan support after clearing the Ways and Means Committee, where lawmakers from both parties acknowledged that the current disability system leaves too many Americans behind.

Still, Republicans led the charge, arguing that practical reforms backed by measurable results are preferable to expanding entitlement programs or making permanent changes without first proving they work.

The bill now moves to the Senate, where lawmakers will decide whether to send it to President Donald Trump’s desk.

Supporters are urging swift action, arguing that restoring the SSA’s demonstration authority represents a fiscally responsible, low-cost reform that could help thousands of Americans regain the dignity, purpose, and financial independence that comes with meaningful work.

If enacted, the Social Security Administration would once again have the authority to launch carefully monitored pilot programs designed to improve employment outcomes, while reporting requirements would provide transparency and accountability as Congress evaluates which reforms deserve permanent consideration.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2026 Political Signal